http://boxover.swazz.org/
Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007/3/16, Nate Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
http://boxover.swazz.org/
Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is.
I was curious and found this in their homepage:
- BoxOver is free and distributed under the GNU license
GNU Licence what? GPL, LGPL? Either way, I think that ca
Yeah I liked that one, and compressed got to 7K, but it is GPL.
musachy
On 3/16/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/3/16, Nate Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://boxover.swazz.org/
>
> Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is.
I was curious and found this
You could ask if they'd be willing/able to change the license...
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah I liked that one, and compressed got to 7K, but it is GPL.
musachy
On 3/16/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2007/3/16, Nate Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I will do that, on that same topic I have an old question , what licenses
can we use?
musachy
On 3/16/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could ask if they'd be willing/able to change the license...
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah I liked that one, an
2007/3/16, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I will do that, on that same topic I have an old question , what licenses
can we use?
http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
HTH
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo
plugin.
We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have any
recommendations?
Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a custom
pr
I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are the
imports on Tooltip.js:
dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
dojo.require("doj
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are the
imports on Tooltip.js:
dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
dojo.require("dojo.ur
The size is 234K, by the way I didn't know you could build a Dojo profile
online, quite cool:
http://build.dojotoolkit.org/0.4.2rc2/web/buildscripts/webbuild/
musachy
On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was looking
On 3/12/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Otherwise, I can put it down for the
17th, and we can call it a St Paddy's day celebration :)
I was looking at the wrong calendar when I said 17th. The time I have
aside is on Monday the 19th, so if there's anything people would like
to do over
Hi dudes,
I would like to join to struts2 development team.
How could I do that?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-join-to-the-dev-team--tf3416906.html#a9522720
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
On 3/16/07, Felipe Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi dudes,
I would like to join to struts2 development team.
How could I do that?
http://struts.apache.org/helping.html
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anyone is looking for something to do, a
> Zero-Configuration MailReader would make a world of
> difference right now.
I know I'm not a committer, but I have one more free
weekend before a new gig starts and I was all set to
volunteer...
But then
In my opinion, you should avoid using custom interceptor stacks
whenever possible. That way, you can simplify your configuration and
make your application more consistent. If the mailreader always used
the default stack, the zero configuration conversion would be trivial.
Of course, another equ
On 3/16/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my opinion, you should avoid using custom interceptor stacks
whenever possible. That way, you can simplify your configuration and
make your application more consistent. If the mailreader always used
the default stack, the zero configuration co
These too would be helpful.
* https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1560
* https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1539
Or, as to the MailReader, a whole 'nother way to go would be to work
it up from scratch as a zero-config, maybe with a HSQLDB backend using
iBATIS or Cayenne. (since Hi
After applying JSLinker, Dojo Compressor and JSMin to domTT, I got it down
to 21.7K, would that be acceptable?
musachy
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The size is 234K, by the way I didn't know you could build a Dojo profile
online, quite cool:
http://build.dojotoolkit.
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After applying JSLinker, Dojo Compressor and JSMin to domTT, I got it down
to 21.7K, would that be acceptable?
That's a pretty huge shrinkage, and seems reasonable to me. What do other
folks think?
--
Marin Cooper
musachy
On 3/16/07,
19 matches
Mail list logo
