Re: [VOTE][SIP-111] Proposal for improved database, schema, and table selection UI in SQL Lab sidebar

+1 binding On Fri, Sep 27, 2024, at 2:17 PM, robe...@dealmeida.net.invalid wrote: > +1, binding > > On 2024-09-24 09:31, Justin Park wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Following up from the corresponding DISCUSS email I sent on January > > 2nd, I > > was hoping to call a vote on [SIP-111] Proposal for impr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 4.1.0 based on Superset 4.1.0rc2

Also -1 binding for the same issues. On Tue, Sep 24, 2024, at 8:24 AM, Michael S. Molina wrote: > -1 (binding) due to blocking issues reported on > https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions/2 > > Best regards, > Michael S. Molina > > > On 22 Aug 2024, at 19:44, Joe Li wrote: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] [SIP-143] Global Async Task Framework

+1 binding On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, at 1:13 PM, Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Hi all, > > I am calling for a vote for SIP-143 [1], following the prior discussion > thread [2]. The SIP intends to introduce a new framework for more efficient > and user friendly execution of asynchronous tasks. > > The vo

Re: [VOTE][SIP-130] Migrating from Mapbox to MapLibre

+1 binding - the rationale in the GitHub discussion is sound and it seems like there's adequate support pledged. On Thu, Jul 25, 2024, at 5:49 PM, Evan Rusackas wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am calling for a vote for SIP-130 [1], which moves to replace MapBox with > MapLibre. This was previously

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 4.1.0 based on Superset 4.1.0rc1

-1 binding for the same reason as Michael On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, at 8:32 AM, Michael S. Molina wrote: > -1 (binding) due to the issues raised in the RC discussion > https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions/29705 > > > On Jul 29, 2024, at 9:18 AM, Phil Dumbreck > > wrote: > > > > 0 > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 4.0.2 based on Superset 4.0.2rc2

+1 binding The regressions I observed in RC1 have been addressed, thank you Michael and Justin and anyone else who worked on those! Note that the sort order will reverse for horizontal bar charts as a result of the fix in #29345. I agree that this is an overall improvement, and it's a single c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 4.0.2 based on Superset 4.0.2rc1

he fixes are all ready so I will > generate RC2 right away. > > Michael > > > On Jun 24, 2024, at 9:34 AM, Sam Firke wrote: > > > > I am part way through testing and have found a couple of regressions from > > 4.0.0: > > https://github.com/apache/superse

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 4.0.2 based on Superset 4.0.2rc1

I am part way through testing and have found a couple of regressions from 4.0.0: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/29342 - folks have been posting this one in Slack https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/29331 - this is trivial on its surface but as I've only just found it, don't know

Re: Deployment

Correct. You can set up WSL2 on the Windows PC, at which point you're running Linux. Then deploy with Linux. Does that count as running Superset on Windows? It's a philosophical question at that point 😁 My org runs almost entirely Windows and looked into the above approach. We decided it was si

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 4.0.1 based on Superset 4.0.1rc1

+1 binding I deployed rc1 to my test environment. Authentication, alerts and reports, chart creation, existing dashboards all look good. I tried out some of the bug fixes and they look good too, e.g., enabling drill-by on a time series chart where there is no dimension (#27941). On Thu, May 2

Re: [VOTE][SIP-123] Proposal replacement of data table components with ag-grid

This sounded dull because I was unfamiliar with the terms. Then I opened the SIP and it looks awesome! That's a nicely done SIP, thanks for the write-up. +1 binding On Tue, Apr 16, 2024, at 8:51 PM, Michael S. Molina wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Best regards, > Michael S. Molina > > > On 16 Apr 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 4.0.0 based on Superset 4.0.0rc1

This RC was very nice. I tested thoroughly and found things looking good overall. Drill-to-detail seemed broken for a second, but then I haven't been able to replicate it so it was probably only user error. I opened and then closed an issue on it: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/27424

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 3.0.3 based on Superset 3.0.3rc3

+1 I tested this with many of my production dashboards and verified that alerts & reports works with docker compose deployment and the -dev container image. The fix of #26034 introduced a new bug #26254. Both cannot currently be fixed simultaneously due to a limitation of ECharts. See the dis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 3.0.3 based on Superset 3.0.3rc1

-1 as this has cherries that break bar charts with a numeric x-axis. See discussion on the RC thread for 3.1.0rc2 for details as my understanding is that those cherries affect 3.0.3rc1: https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions/26240 On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, at 11:23 AM, Michael S. Molina wro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 3.1.0 based on Superset 3.1.0rc2

-1 due to the regressions associated with bar charts having a numeric x-axis. See discussion on the RC thread for details: https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions/26240 On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, at 2:57 PM, Michael S. Molina wrote: > Hello Superset Community, > > This is a call for the vote

Re: [VOTE][SIP-108] Superset Release Process

+1 vote and ditto what Evan said. On Mon, Dec 4, 2023, at 5:12 PM, Evan Rusackas wrote: > +1 (binding) > > This discussion and document have been shaping up nicely for quite some time, > and I’m glad that we’re at the point where so many of us are in alignment. As > always, we can continue to a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 3.1.0 based on Superset 3.1.0rc1

-1 due to the issues documented in the thread John linked. I encourage folks to test rc1 as long as the vote is open so that as many issues as possible are identified and we keep the number of release candidates to a minimum. Thanks to Michael for leading this release process! On Fri, Dec 1, 20

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 3.0.2 based on Superset 3.0.2rc2

+1 The Azure SSO problem from rc1 is fixed (thanks Michael and Daniel!). I clicked around, did some light testing, everything looked good. Sam On Mon, Nov 20, 2023, at 3:41 PM, Michael S. Molina wrote: > Hello Superset Community, > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Superset vers

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 3.0.2 based on Superset 3.0.2rc1

-1 My existing Azure SSO broke when I tried out 3.0.2rc1. I'm unable to log in. When I revert the image to 3.0.1 it works again. Perhaps related to a bump in the Flask App builder version? I've created a GitHub issue for this, #26007. On Thu, Nov 16, 2023, at 12:57 PM, Ville Brofeldt wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 3.0.0 based on Superset 3.0.0rc3

I tested reports and my existing dashboards, all of that looked good. I commented in the #apache-releases channel re: some aesthetic changes that I think should be noted in the release notes. I'll vote -1 though because of bugs noted in the link John supplied below. On Tue, Aug 29, 2023, at 2:5

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.1 based on Superset 2.1.1rc3

+1 On Tue, Aug 22, 2023, at 10:43 AM, Michael S. Molina wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Best regards, > Michael S. Molina > > > On 22 Aug 2023, at 11:38, Daniel Gaspar wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Cheers, > > Daniel Gaspar / Superset PMC > > > > > >> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 01:49, Elizabet

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sam Firke

MC) for Apache Superset has invited Sam > Firke to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has > accepted. > > While I botched the templated part, the personalized part of the message is > still 100% sincere :) Again, welcome aboard, Sam! We’re lucky to have

Proposal: Tag docker images of official Apache releases as "official"

There's been a little discussion about this on Github (https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions/22244) and in the #operational-model-release-strategy channel on Slack. I propose that the release process for an official Apache release include tagging the associated docker images with a new

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.1 based on Superset 2.1.1rc1

; > I think that a path forward would be to revert that PR on 2.1.1 and fixing > Alert & Reports auth issue on master and inclusion on 3.0.0 > > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 at 15:26, Sam Firke wrote: > > > The addition of strong session protection by default < > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.1 based on Superset 2.1.1rc1

The addition of strong session protection by default meant that I could not log into Superset when I switched the image to 2.1.1rc1 – I was stuck in a redirect loop from the welcome screen to the login screen. I changed my config to SESSION_PROTE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.0 based on Superset 2.1.0rc2

sn't work. > How about 2.1.0-dev I believe 2.1.0 and 2.1.0-dev are same. Ideally > shouldn’t the fix present in 2.1.0 itself. > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > > From: Sam Firke > Sent: Friday, May

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.0 based on Superset 2.1.0rc2

> > > >> > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/superset/blob/ > > > da > > > 3791ad3daa209631a588394600d1__;!!LpKI!j4vMZKp0bgaggE6smVZkHUAuixG90p > > > 9x z0Kpz_9RjgQsmyMq_TmVaf5Y0ZM0tZx08OF9YD4rmT63XwZHw3E$ > > > [github[.]c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.0 based on Superset 2.1.0rc3

+1 non binding Report emails are working for me with the dev image. Looks good all around. Thank you everyone who worked on this release! On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, at 6:38 PM, Elizabeth Thompson wrote: > Hello Superset Community, > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Superset version 2.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.0 based on Superset 2.1.0rc2

gt; https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/superset/blob/da > > > 3791ad3daa209631a588394600d1__;!!LpKI!j4vMZKp0bgaggE6smVZkHUAuixG90p9x > > > z0Kpz_9RjgQsmyMq_TmVaf5Y0ZM0tZx08OF9YD4rmT63XwZHw3E$ [github[.]com] > > > >> a8b635e814/superset/config.py#L13

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.0 based on Superset 2.1.0rc2

gt; https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/superset/blob/da > > > 3791ad3daa209631a588394600d1__;!!LpKI!j4vMZKp0bgaggE6smVZkHUAuixG90p9x > > > z0Kpz_9RjgQsmyMq_TmVaf5Y0ZM0tZx08OF9YD4rmT63XwZHw3E$ [github[.]com] > > > >> a8b635e814/superset/config.py#L13

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.0 based on Superset 2.1.0rc2

I'm also seeing errors with Alerts and Reports in rc2. Looking at the logs it appears to be this issue: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/22326 On Wed, Mar 15, 2023, 5:27 AM Pankaj soni wrote: > Not able to send alerts, screenshot as alerts and reports as well. > > On Wed, 15 Mar, 2023,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.0 based on Superset 2.1.0rc2

I've put my testing notes here: https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions/23357#discussioncomment-5314068 Would love to hear from others who are testing. Looking good, my thanks to those who worked on rc2 and patched bugs since rc1 ! On Mon, Mar 13, 2023, 9:36 PM Elizabeth Thompson wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.1.0 based on Superset 2.1.0rc1

Same here, dashboards with filters out of scope fail to load. I've noted that on the discussion thread https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions/23164. I'll keep testing the release and will post my findings in that thread but IMO this is the biggest bug in Superset 2.0.1 and I would vote -1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.0.1 based on Superset 2.0.1rc6

+1 I looked at some of the new features/bug fixes and they looked good. I tried out some of my major existing dashboards and found no problems. On Tue, Dec 20, 2022, 11:18 AM Daniel Gaspar wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Daniel Gaspar / Superset PMC > > On 2022/12/16 01:48:07 Elizabeth Thompson wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset 2.0.1 based on Superset 2.0.1rc5

Would it be possible to push docker images for 2.01rc5 and 2.01rc5-dev to Docker Hub, as was done with 2.0.1rc4? That would make it easier for me to test out this release candidate next week. Thanks, Sam On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 5:11 PM Arash Afghahi wrote: > Hello Superset Community, > > This