Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-28 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG) https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Sep/0001.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or o

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread Ms2ger
On 29/09/16 03:02, L. David Baron wrote: > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: > > Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG) > https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Sep/0001.html

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread Tantek Çelik
Note the major changes summary: https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html#changes-from-wp1 This is my first pass review (already found problems). I may try to review in more depth to see what (if any) specific wording changes there are in the charter (is there a paragraph by par

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 9/29/16 10:46 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote: New deliverables: Microdata This should be dropped from the charter (FO). Ironic to see this since Firefox (release!) just dropped support for Microdata Are they talking about the HTML microdata API (what we dropped) or just specifying the HTML mi

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 9/29/16 11:21 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote: All of what was previously abandoned. The charter http://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html#deliverables links to the 2013 Microdata Note. I did see that it linked to the note. It wasn't clear whether that means "revive everything in th

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 9/29/16 10:46 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote: >>> >>> New deliverables: >>>Microdata >> >> >> This should be dropped from the charter (FO). >> >> Ironic to see this since Firefox (release!) just dropped support for >> Microdata > > > Are they

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread L. David Baron
On Thursday 2016-09-29 10:42 +0200, Ms2ger wrote: > On 29/09/16 03:02, L. David Baron wrote: > > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: > > > > Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG) > > https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html > > https://

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread L. David Baron
On Thursday 2016-09-29 07:46 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: > > Marked as deliverables to be taken up if incubation suggests likely success: > > Background Synchronisation; Filesystem API; FindText API; HTML Import; > > Input Methods; Packaging; Quota API > > This section is confusing and weakly wor

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:51 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Thursday 2016-09-29 07:46 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: >> > Marked as deliverables to be taken up if incubation suggests likely >> > success: >> > Background Synchronisation; Filesystem API; FindText API; HTML Import; >> > Input Methods

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2016-09-30 14:02 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: > Also, just found this in the charter: > announcement > Not really acceptable. I think it should link to the same URL as the other "(announcement)" link. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozi