Re: Intent to orphan: perl-Mail-DKIM and python-beaker

* Miro Hrončok [04/07/2018 23:12] : > > Anybody who wants perl-Mail-DKIM (needed by amavisd-new, spamassassin) > before I orphan it? I'll take it (fas: eseyman). Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Intent to orphan: perl-Mail-DKIM and python-beaker

* Miro Hrončok [04/07/2018 23:12] : > > Anybody who wants perl-Mail-DKIM (needed by amavisd-new, spamassassin) > before I orphan it? I'll take it (fas: eseyman). Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-07-05 - 88% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/07/05/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.11-20180704gitea7e989.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1598259] New: perl-Config-Perl-V-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598259 Bug ID: 1598259 Summary: perl-Config-Perl-V-0.30 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Config-Perl-V Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Fedora Rawhide-20180702.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180701.n.0): ID: 254386 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/254386 ID: 254396

Intent to orphan: perl-Mail-DKIM and python-beaker

Anybody who wants perl-Mail-DKIM (needed by amavisd-new, spamassassin) before I orphan it? Anybody who wants python-beaker (needed by TurboGears2, python-pylons, previously also python-mako) before I orphan it? This one FTBFS on Python 3.7. Let me know. I'll orphan the packages in a week.

Re: Your package requires Python 3.6, rebuild it!

On 4.7.2018 21:51, Sérgio Basto wrote: since 2018-07-02 14:28 [1] we don't have compose this mean build root on copr aren't update , and we can't test it Try adding http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/x86_64/ as a repo to copr. there should be no more problems like iwth

Re: Your package requires Python 3.6, rebuild it!

since 2018-07-02 14:28 [1] we don't have compose this mean build root on copr aren't update , and we can't test it https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/latest-Fedora-Rawhid e/ On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 21:44 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi again, > > this as a reminder that you

[Bug 1529797] fusioninventory-agent-2.4.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529797 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: Packages which needlessly use %defattr

On Wednesday, July 04 2018, Jonny Heggheim wrote: > On 07/04/2018 03:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> Yeah, but since it's many thousands of packages, I think maybe you >> didn't have to send the whole list? > I like that he sent the whole list, then I can search for my username > and check if

Re: koji build error

Thanks, it worked. I've used spectool to download the archive file and then used fedpkg new-sources as you suggested. Il giorno mar 3 lug 2018 alle 7:33, Vascom ha scritto: You need to add source file via command fedpkg new-sources extractpdfmark-1.0.2.tar.gz And push changes to git repo.

Re: Packages which needlessly use %defattr

Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:18:00 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> What about just doing a mass specfile update now? I think asking >> individual maintainers to fix their packages isn't worth their >> time. It's a safe change, > > Is it? I haven't found whether this

Re: Packages which needlessly use %defattr

On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:18:00 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > What about just doing a mass specfile update now? I think asking > individual maintainers to fix their packages isn't worth their > time. It's a safe change, Is it? I haven't found whether this change is compatible with

Merging Perl 5.28 to Fedora 29

Hello, Perl SIG completed Perl 5.28 upgrade in f29-perl side tag that involved rebuildnig about 3000 packags. Once relengs merge the tag back to f29 , the new Perl becomes available. If you encounter any

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Modules for Everyone

On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 14:17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > - pkcon ? > - Gnome Software ? I've been talking internally about this. The idea is for pkcon and GNOME Software to have a superficial view of what modules are, but not to actually expose all the nitty-gritty detail. It's on my

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Modules for Everyone

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:50:32AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:38 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > It also carries with it the implication that the supported package > > > managers > >

Re: [F29 only] Dropping requirements for initscripts package from specfiles

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:16 AM Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:56 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] >> wrote: >> > Hello people, >> > >> > I'm working on making Fedora being able to function completely without the >> >

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Modules for Everyone

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:38 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > It also carries with it the implication that the supported package managers > > must handle module updates correctly. (It does *not* require that they all >

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-07-05 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-07-05 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2018-06-28 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2018-06-28 12:00

[Bug 1597929] perl-Mojolicious-7.87 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597929 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mojolicious-7.86 is|perl-Mojolicious-7.87 is

Re: [F29 only] Dropping requirements for initscripts package from specfiles

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:16 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:56 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] > wrote: > > Hello people, > > > > I'm working on making Fedora being able to function completely without the > > 'initscripts' package (hopefully) some day in the future. I have done

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 04:25:16PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 02:54:07PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > > > IMHO deprecate != remove, but rather mark for removal in some next > > > release. > > > Should the change be called differently? > > Especially since Yum has been

Re: [F29 only] Dropping requirements for initscripts package from specfiles

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:56 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > Hello people, > > I'm working on making Fedora being able to function completely without the > 'initscripts' package (hopefully) some day in the future. I have done some > cleanup in initscripts recently, and I would like to ask

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Modules for Everyone

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > It also carries with it the implication that the supported package managers > must handle module updates correctly. (It does *not* require that they all > be able to handle selecting/switching module streams, but it must honor >

glibc license updates

I updated the License tag in the RPM file to match reality more closely: # In general, GPLv2+ is used by programs, LGPLv2+ is used for # libraries. # # LGPLv2+ with exceptions is used for things that are linked directly # into dynamically linked programs and shared libraries (e.g. crt # files,

Heads up: /usr/bin/python moved to a separate package

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_usr_bin_python_into_separate_package It has been done. If you hit problems with automatic bytecompilation, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_usr_bin_python_into_separate_package#Effect_on_automatic_bytecompilation If you hit problems

Heads up: /usr/bin/python moved to a separate package

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_usr_bin_python_into_separate_package It has been done. If you hit problems with automatic bytecompilation, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_usr_bin_python_into_separate_package#Effect_on_automatic_bytecompilation If you hit problems

Re: Packages which needlessly use %defattr

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 02:02:16PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I ran the find-needless-defattr command from > https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities to find specfiles which > include a non-default-changing %defattr as the first line of a %files > section. This found 2513

Re: What is the criterion for Python 3.7 side tag merge?

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:33:37PM -0600, William Moreno wrote: > > > > > > OK. I'll ask releng to merge on Monday. > > > > > Was it merged? Yep. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Perl 5.28 upgrade

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:47:59AM +0200, Jitka Plesnikova wrote: > Perl 5.28 change was discussed on FESCO meeting and was accepted. > Perl 5.28 was released on June 23 2018 and mass rebuild can start. > > I have required `f29-perl' build-root for this purpose and it was created. > > I will

Re: Packages which needlessly use %defattr

Hi Nico. On 07/04/2018 03:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Yeah, but since it's many thousands of packages, I think maybe you > didn't have to send the whole list? I like that he sent the whole list, then I can search for my username and check if I am on the list. > It's been useful for