Hi,
anyone up for review swaps? I'm updating clojure and
it requires two new dependencies, here are the review requests:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821025
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821026
Best wishes,
Markku
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/51010
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/04/06/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.5-20200405git52e2894.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 4:45 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 22:23, Christopher wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 12:55:40PM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> ATM the Tab "Automated Test Results" shows just is message:
>
> Failed to talk to Greenwave.
There was a greenwave outage around the time you posted this.
It should have long since cleared up, but if you are still
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 03:37:29PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 9:52 AM Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
> > OK so swig3 seems to just be in CentOS extras and not in RHEL extras.
> >
>
> Is this the way it should be? All the EPEL test instances are CentOS,
> right? If I
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 09:59:24AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> RHEL 8.2 will have a newer qt5 (qt5-5.12.5).
> They have also cleaned up their qt5-srpm-macros, to remove a macro for
> a package they do not support, nor plan on supporting. I have
> verified this was their intention and they do not
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200404.0):
ID: 567430 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/567430
Old failures (same test failed in
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related
> to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 5:31:38 PM
> Subject: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change Proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose V3
>
> I sent out the
Hello,
Would anyone like to swap a review please? I'd like to get "STEPS"
reviewed for inclusion in NeuroFedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone:
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 22:23, Christopher wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > >
> > > Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
> >
> > Yes, they are:
> >
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 12:13 PM stan via devel
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:56:08 -0400
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tried packaging v4l2loopback into Fedora? I'd really like
> > to set up a screen capture device for video conferencing stuff, but I
> > keep running into problems
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
> >
> > Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
>
> Yes, they are:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820788
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.817-1.fc30.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43046241
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820788
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1676421
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1676421=edit
[patch] Update to 0.817 (#1820788)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820788
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.816
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
Yes, they are:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/what-can-be-packaged/#_no_external_kernel_modules
--
Iñaki Úcar
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 9:03 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
My recollection (from some time ago) was there was
a process to request a (short term) exception to
allow one to ship a kernel module if the kernel
module developer (not the
OLD: Fedora-32-20200404.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200405.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 42
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 49.80 MiB
Size of dropped packages:52.37 KiB
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200404.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200405.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 287.87 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 02:56:08 -0400
Christopher wrote:
> Has anyone tried packaging v4l2loopback into Fedora? I'd really like
> to set up a screen capture device for video conferencing stuff, but I
> keep running into problems with SecureBoot. I don't really know what
> I'm doing with mokutil or
On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote:
> On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
>> on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages:
>>
> [:snip:]
>
>
> Thanks a lot for updating PETSc, I
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 8:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
...
> >> For the stated reasons I am *-1 for this change in its current form*.
> >
> > That is your privilege as a member of FESCo. As I've said, however, I
> > think you've misunderstood the situation.
>
> Do you want to leave it at "this is
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 21:37:05 -, Artem Tim wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754807
That does look like it. I'll go through the comments and see if I can
help with more info.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 15:33:57 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 3:13 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've had my system hang up a few times when running mock this evening.
> > I've got to power it off and restart it using the switch. Is anyone else
> > seeing this?
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820924
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 09:43:35AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:36:58AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 4/1/20 8:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > >This is _only_ going into Rawhide / F33? It looks like the change to
> > >the new OCaml dependency
Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820127
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817204
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Search-Elasticsearch-6 |perl-Search-Elasticsearch-6
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
Has anyone tried packaging v4l2loopback into Fedora? I'd really like
to set up a screen capture device for video conferencing stuff, but I
keep running into problems with SecureBoot. I don't really know what
I'm doing with mokutil or DKMS and I'm generally uncomfortable
building kernel
33 matches
Mail list logo
