https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165302
Bug ID: 2165302
Summary: F38FailsToInstall: perl-Clownfish-CFC
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Clownfish-CFC
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:23:49AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:03 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 01:49:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 09:03:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
>
The python-qt5 package in RHEL 8 does not ship the webkit package. I'm
assuming that this is unlikely to be changed since qt5-qtwebkit isn't in
RHEL but is in EPEL.
I think I'm close to producing a python-qt5-epel package here [1] that
produces python3-qt5-webkit and would love to hear from
Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Sat, 2023-01-21 at 10:06 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > This is only supposed to happen if (a) upgrading from systemd <
> > 246.1-1, which you're not doing, or (b) installing systemd for the
> > first time, which you're not doing. Must be a bug in the package
I can pick this package up if you're stepping back. The lizards devs are
planning on a new release sometime this year, but there's still a few
things they're trying to finish up first before releasing v3.13. Last I
heard they wanted it to be out before summer.
JT
On January 28, 2023 10:14:14
On 2023-01-28 15:23, Fabio Valentini wrote:
If I understand things correctly, this is not entirely true. RPM
generates a dependency for the soname / soversion, and some projects
include not only X, but all of X.Y.Z in that, which RPM will happily
generate Provides / Requires for
$ ls -l
On 2023-01-28 13:03, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
...or "(libfoo.so.2()(64bit) with foo-libs >= x.y.z)", where x.y.z is the
version of the package that provides libfoo.so.2 in the build root, which is
an idea that's growing on me.
This is indeed a shortcoming in the rpm symbol dependency
On 1/28/23 18:43, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 1/28/23 18:06, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 8:31 PM Reon Beon via devel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are there still some outstanding bugs preventing this from happening?
>>
>> Is there any one critical feature that justifies the
On 1/28/23 18:06, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 8:31 PM Reon Beon via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> Are there still some outstanding bugs preventing this from happening?
>
> Is there any one critical feature that justifies the update? Avoiding
> the requirement of python is... OK,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:03 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 01:49:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 09:03:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >
> > > This is indeed a shortcoming in the rpm symbol dependency generation
>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 8:31 PM Reon Beon via devel
wrote:
>
> Are there still some outstanding bugs preventing this from happening?
Is there any one critical feature that justifies the update? Avoiding
the requirement of python is... OK, maybe understandable, but I don't
see it as a "must-have"
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 01:49:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 09:03:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > This is indeed a shortcoming in the rpm symbol dependency generation scheme.
>
> Is it though? I'm probibly reading this too quickly and missing
>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 1:23 PM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 2023-01-28 00:14, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > If there is a problem with not uodating dependencies when you do an
> > install or an update on selected packages, the packages dependencies
> > are not properly defined.
>
>
> By definition,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 09:03:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> This is indeed a shortcoming in the rpm symbol dependency generation scheme.
Is it though? I'm probibly reading this too quickly and missing
something, but isn't the underlying problem here that nghttp2 changed
abi
Polymake 4.9 is out and includes an soname bump. In a week, I will
build it in Rawhide, along with the sole consumer of its library
interface, python-jupymake.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list --
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 12:12:40PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2023-01-28 10:22, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > In order for rpm to do this, you'd probably have to throw out the
> > current implementation of dependency resolution that provides
> > "libfoo.so.2()(64bit)" and instead provide a
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 23:31:21 -
Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> It seems to be this bug:
> https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/fedy/issues/110
Strictly speaking, it is not a bug. The fedora mesa rpm was
deliberately changed to remove some va-api and vdpau support because of
patent issues. When
On 2023-01-28 10:22, Gordon Messmer wrote:
In order for rpm to do this, you'd probably have to throw out the
current implementation of dependency resolution that provides
"libfoo.so.2()(64bit)" and instead provide a dependency like "(foo-libs
>= 2.4 with foo-libs < 3)", at least for the
On 2023-01-28 00:14, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
If there is a problem with not uodating dependencies when you do an
install or an update on selected packages, the packages dependencies
are not properly defined.
By definition, yes. But rpm auto-detects dependencies, and rpm doesn't
do
libsoup3 depends on libnghttp2.so.14
Apparantly, either libsoup3 should depend on the minor version (in addition to
the major version), or libnghhttp2 should have bumped major, depending on the
"history" of that symbol. Probably the former (API addition in a minor bump to
the same major).
I've just orphaned lizardfs. Lizardfs is a clustered network
filesystem that has very efficient small file / metadata performance,
but hasn't seen any upstream point releases since the end of 2017 and
now FTBFS in the latest mass rebuild.
Jonathan
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165210
Bug ID: 2165210
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.087 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230127.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230128.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.47 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 18:43:56 -0800,
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Second, I'd like to suggest that in the future, at least in Fedora,
for any "install" or "update" operation that dnf performs, dnf's
default behavior should be checking all of the direct and indirect
dependencies of the packages
24 matches
Mail list logo
