Hi.
Out of curiosity, was looking to know -
Query#1: Does OpenMPI has any document related with OpenMPI Internals?
Query#2: Does any slides talks of OpenMPI internals, If yes, any links for
the same?
Query#3: Do any Static-Analysis open-source tools are available for
analyzing OpenMPI?
On May 8, 2008, at 5:06 AM, Mukesh K Srivastava wrote:
Hi.
Greetings! There probably isn't much need to CC both lists; this
question is probably more suited for the devel list. I'm following up
to both lists so that the answer is archived on the web properly, but
if there's any followu
FWIW:
- I think "none" is a slightly better word than "null" for this value;
"none" implies that you don't open anything, whereas "null" could be a
specific component (as it is/was in some frameworks).
- Whatever word we decide on will need to become a reserved component
name (i.e., no co
On May 8, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
FWIW:
- I think "none" is a slightly better word than "null" for this value;
"none" implies that you don't open anything, whereas "null" could be a
specific component (as it is/was in some frameworks).
Calling it 'none' sounds fine to me.
-
On May 8, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Josh Hursey wrote:
--> If not intended to be used by users (i.e., it's an internal
mechanism only), is there a reason why we're not using a zero-length
string (e.g., mpirun --mca foo "")?
I think a zero length string might get confusing with the empty
string. The em
On May 8, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On May 8, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Josh Hursey wrote:
--> If not intended to be used by users (i.e., it's an internal
mechanism only), is there a reason why we're not using a zero-length
string (e.g., mpirun --mca foo "")?
I think a zero length strin
On May 8, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Josh Hursey wrote:
I think 'all' would be a nice symmetric addition to complement 'none'
and then this would allow users to specify the "select best from all
available" option on the command line.
Ok, if you accept "all" and "none" as friendly ammendments to your
Sounds good.
I can probably try to finish the patch in the next couple weeks, but
if someone needs it before I get a chance to look at it let me know.
Once the implementation is complete, then the RFC will be updated with
a termination date for further input.
Cheers,
Josh
On May 8, 2008,
Hi.
The OMPI community should think to come with OpenMPI Internals document.
Probably having an Internal document will certainly help developers of
OpenMPI.
What one has to do - if one is thinking to come with OMPI Internals document
to start with? Is there any link or project repository within O
I think I have a problem but I am not sure. I used to be able to use the
circumflex (^) to switch between the gridengine launcher and the ssh
launchers by doing something like this, e.g. -mca plm ^gridengine, to
exclude some of the components plm (and also in ras). It doesn't seem
like the 'neg
Rainer --
What do the numeric arguments refer to in the attribute format stuff?
The wiki page has only one example, and it doesn't explain what these
numbers are:
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/CompilerAttributes
Thanks!
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
They refer to the parameters of the function. In the example linked, 2
means the fmt is the second argument of the function and 3 is the
first variadic arg related to the fmt string.
Aurelien
Le 8 mai 08 à 18:24, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
Rainer --
What do the numeric arguments refer to in t
Cool; I've updated the wiki.
Thanks!
On May 8, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Aurélien Bouteiller wrote:
They refer to the parameters of the function. In the example linked, 2
means the fmt is the second argument of the function and 3 is the
first variadic arg related to the fmt string.
Aurelien
Le 8 ma
Sorry about that. I didn't test that type of option. It should be
working in r18418. Let me know if you see any more issues.
-- Josh
On May 8, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Pak Lui wrote:
I think I have a problem but I am not sure. I used to be able to
use the
circumflex (^) to switch between the grid
Hi,
I'm finishing the implementation of a MTL module but something went wrong.
This module is using PML/cm and the Recv operations are hanging in the
ompi_request_wait_completion() call in pml_cm_recv.c:mca_pml_cm_recv(). I
think that I must set the variable recvreq->req_base.req_ompi.req_complete
Thanks very much Josh! Will try it out soon.
Josh Hursey wrote:
Sorry about that. I didn't test that type of option. It should be
working in r18418. Let me know if you see any more issues.
-- Josh
On May 8, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Pak Lui wrote:
I think I have a problem but I am not sure. I used
Caciano,
It's a little bit more complex than that. In fact you should never set
the req_complete flag to true yourself. Instead you should use
ompi_request_complete (defined in ompi/request/request.h) which will
set the flag and trigger a condition broadcast or signal for you. This
will a
17 matches
Mail list logo