Re: [Development] Proposal to include QtGamepad as an add-on module

2016-01-25 Thread Mike Krus
+1, will be useful for the tvOS remote! Mike On 25/01/2016 15:37, Agocs Laszlo wrote: Hello, The Qt Gamepad module has been living in a qt-labs repo (*) for some time. I’d like to propose to upgrade it to an add-on module and include it as a Tech Preview in Qt 5.7. This would also benefit

Re: [Development] tvOS port

2016-01-25 Thread Hausmann Simon
Awesome work :) Simon From: Development on behalf of Mike Krus Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 21:06 To: Qt Development Group Subject: [Development] tvOS port Hi during the xmas break, I took

Re: [Development] Proposal to include QtGamepad as an add-on module

2016-01-25 Thread Knoll Lars
And another +1 from me. Cheers, Lars On 26/01/16 08:42, "Development on behalf of Mike Krus" wrote: >+1, will be useful for the tvOS remote! > > >Mike > >On 25/01/2016 15:37, Agocs Laszlo wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The Qt

Re: [Development] Proposal to include qtscxml as Qt add-on module

2016-01-25 Thread Knoll Lars
+1 for making it a TP in 5.7 and another +1 for Erik becoming the maintainer. Cheers, Lars On 25/01/16 19:49, "Development on behalf of Turunen Tuukka" wrote: > >+1 > >State machine framework has been part of

Re: [Development] Proposal to include qtscxml as Qt add-on module

2016-01-25 Thread Helio Chissini de Castro
Hello I'm just curious, is Qt project aiming for be a umbrella of libraries tied to Qt release or this libraries like QtGamePad on other thread should be more suitable to something like inqlude.org ( or similar ). Just to clarify, as a distro packager too. []'s On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:47

Re: [Development] What kind of airplane we want to build?

2016-01-25 Thread Jędrzej Nowacki
On Friday 22 of January 2016 08:50:52 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday 22 January 2016 11:26:55 Bogdan Vatra wrote: > > AFAIK C++11/14 compilers have zero-cost exception, so, is there any reason > > why not start using them in Qt 6.0 ? > > Yes. There's a couple of man-decades worth of work to

[Development] Proposal to include qtscxml as Qt add-on module

2016-01-25 Thread Blasche Alexander
Hi, As part of the renewed publishing process following the new KDE Free Qt foundation agreement, we'd like to publish the source of the new Qt SCXML module. I'd like to propose the module to be accepted as part of the Qt add-on modules. The module itself is brand new as well (target is a

Re: [Development] Stepping down as Windows Embedded Compact port maintainer

2016-01-25 Thread Knoll Lars
On 25/01/16 14:54, "Development on behalf of Giuseppe D'Angelo" wrote: >Il 23/10/2015 22:19, Hausmann Simon ha scritto: >> +1x2 > >Howdy, > >was this nomination somehow lost in the process? Looks like it. Sorry for

Re: [Development] Proposal to include qtscxml as Qt add-on module

2016-01-25 Thread Turunen Tuukka
+1 State machine framework has been part of Qt for many years and there was also some work earlier for scxml compatibility, which was never completed. SCXML is an industry standard format, which can be exported from multiple different tools. Yours, Tuukka > Blasche Alexander

[Development] tvOS port

2016-01-25 Thread Mike Krus
Hi during the xmas break, I took "advantage" of the dreadful weather to investigate porting Qt5 (dev branch) to Apple's tvOS. Due to tvOS being mostly built upon iOS, the initial work was quite straight forward, adding a new mkspec, a new configure option, a CONFIG variable (tvos), enabling

Re: [Development] Proposal to include QtGamepad as an add-on module

2016-01-25 Thread Bogdan Vatra
+1 BogDan. On Monday 25 January 2016 15:37:45 Agocs Laszlo wrote: > Hello, > > The Qt Gamepad module has been living in a qt-labs repo (*) for some time. > I'd like to propose to upgrade it to an add-on module and include it as a > Tech Preview in Qt 5.7. This would also benefit other modules,

Re: [Development] Proposal to include QtGamepad as an add-on module

2016-01-25 Thread Sean Harmer
On 25/01/2016 15:37, Agocs Laszlo wrote: Hello, The Qt Gamepad module has been living in a qt-labs repo (*) for some time. I’d like to propose to upgrade it to an add-on module and include it as a Tech Preview in Qt 5.7. This would also benefit other modules, for instance Qt 3D has

Re: [Development] Proposal to include qtscxml as Qt add-on module

2016-01-25 Thread Kevin Funk
On Monday, January 25, 2016 02:55:27 PM Blasche Alexander wrote: > Hi, > > As part of the renewed publishing process following the new KDE Free Qt > foundation agreement, we'd like to publish the source of the new Qt SCXML > module. > > I'd like to propose the module to be accepted as part of

Re: [Development] Doc: Making it easier for devs to know if a class is supported on a given platform

2016-01-25 Thread Smith Martin
I suppose the default should be that a class is fully supported on all Qt platforms, so the qdoc command should be \notsupported with the list of not supported platforms. \notsupported ...could appear in a \class or a \fn or in a \qmltype or \qmlmethod. martin

Re: [Development] What kind of airplane we want to build?

2016-01-25 Thread Ziller Eike
> On Jan 23, 2016, at 1:12 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Ziller Eike wrote: >>> I would like that trend to continue. The likely next candidates are >>> threads, futures and locks. >> >> +1 > > I wonder why everyone so far agreed on that. So let me dissent: I think >

Re: [Development] Charts and DataVis Questions

2016-01-25 Thread Alexis Jeandet
Le samedi 23 janvier 2016 à 12:45 +, Uwe Rathmann a écrit : > Hi, > > > The OpenGL acceleration in Charts module is really impressive ... > > Unfortunately part of the truth is, that the performance of the > software  > renderer does not necessarily be that far behind. The test I did with

Re: [Development] What kind of airplane we want to build?

2016-01-25 Thread Ziller Eike
> On Jan 23, 2016, at 1:47 AM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > On Saturday 23 January 2016 01:23:30 Kevin Kofler wrote: >> I feel it's actually TOO rapidly changing. C++11 even threw out C >> compatibility, not only by not adopting all C99 improvements (e.g. VLAs), >>

Re: [Development] Charts and DataVis Questions

2016-01-25 Thread Rutledge Shawn
On 23 Jan 2016, at 19:52, Sean Harmer > wrote: On 23/01/2016 12:45, Uwe Rathmann wrote: Hi, The OpenGL acceleration in Charts module is really impressive ... Unfortunately part of the truth is, that the performance of the software renderer

[Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.6.0 branching ongoing

2016-01-25 Thread Heikkinen Jani
‘5.6.0’ branch is now available, please start using it for the changes targeted to Qt5.6.0 release. We will merge ‘5.6’ branch to ‘5.6.0’ Monday 1st February so there should be enough time to finalize ongoing changes in ‘5.6’ and start using '5.6.0'. All new changes for Qt5.6.0 should be done

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.6.0 branching ongoing

2016-01-25 Thread mark diener
Jani: I see the 5.6.0 RC blocker list. But what about bugs like? Using 5.6.0 Beta: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-50374 What is the criterion for entry into the blocker list? Only core code, not tools? Thank you, md On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Heikkinen Jani