On miércoles, 7 de diciembre de 2016 08:02:20 ART Thiago Macieira wrote:
[snip]
> But the extra versioning is a further safety check: if something was missed
> in the update, like for example some code compiled by the user (regardless
> of use of package management), it will necessarily stop workin
Hello guys!QtSDK maintenance now based on 2.0.4 framework, but what about 2.0.4 tag and binaries for QtIFW?
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Hi,
(I'll try to answer some comments made in the gerrit review here. IMO gerrit
works great for editorial stuff, but not for more substantial things).
> [Tobias Hunger]
> I would make the homepage mandatory in the attribution file. That information
> is critical IMHO when you want to find out m
Morten Sorvig supplied:
> For some background, here’s what typical application startup looks
> like on macOS, NaCl, and Emscripten:
I've updated [0] to illustrate these.
[0] https://wiki.qt.io/Application_Start-up_Patterns
> macOS: Define the application delegate, create instance of it in main()
Hi,
I'd like to put down the rules on how we handle code in Qt that we as Qt
contributors do not have copyright over ourselves in a QUIP:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/177201/6/quip-0004.txt
I suggest that
- Every third party component must be documented by a qt_attribution.json file
-
Apologies, I should've expanded a little more on what I said. For example if we
expose a QObject class to Qt instead of a function, then we could dispatch a
static meta-call to a static initialization function that is called before the
constructor, if present. Introspection makes that quite eas
Hi,
I don't think it does handle those cases. But we're not talking about
eliminating main(), we're talking about a second supported "launch" method.
That said, it's still possible to run code before the constructor, although
it's not pretty.
Simon
From: La
Hi,
How does this handle the cases that need code before the QGuiApplication
construction? AFAICS it does not.
Laszlo
From: Development
[mailto:development-bounces+laszlo.agocs=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
Simon Hausmann
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 10:37 AM
To: Mathias Hasselmann ;
Hi,
The joke of the bikeshedding aside I for one do like the idea of exporting a
QObject sub-class instead of a function. That makes it easier to extend in the
future with more entry-points as slots for example.
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Mathia