On Friday, 13 January 2023 08:06:23 PST Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
wrote:
> That's not what `inline` is for. Did you try doing a static build, and
> enable a sufficiently aggressive LTO?
Please note that C inline works differently from C++ inline.
In C, if the compiler decides not to
Sorry, I just realized this idea breaks binary compatibility. Just ignore
it.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
On 13/01/2023 02:38, samuel ammonius wrote:
Hello,
About a year ago, I emailed here asking if C bindings could be added to
Qt's official repo, and since then I've written a pretty large python
script that generates the wrappers by reading Qt's header files. I
originally thought that "inline
Hello,
About a year ago, I emailed here asking if C bindings could be added to
Qt's official repo, and since then I've written a pretty large python
script that generates the wrappers by reading Qt's header files. I
originally thought that "inline extern" function declarations would make
the