On 11/22/11 2:23 PM, "ext Richard Moore" wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Peter Hartmann
> wrote:
>> Within 15 working days, we have received mails from 10 people who second
>> this nomination, and we have not received an objection.
>>
>>
>> So Rich Moore is hereby solemnly declared an a
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Peter Hartmann
wrote:
> Within 15 working days, we have received mails from 10 people who second
> this nomination, and we have not received an objection.
>
>
> So Rich Moore is hereby solemnly declared an approver for the Qt project.
> Congratulations!
Thanks Gu
Within 15 working days, we have received mails from 10 people who second
this nomination, and we have not received an objection.
So Rich Moore is hereby solemnly declared an approver for the Qt project.
Congratulations!
Peter
On 11/01/2011 04:00 PM, ext Peter Hartmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> he
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:08:56PM +, ext Richard Moore wrote:
> What has actually been more annoying is the lack of the ability to
> mark bugs as closed in JIRA, and otherwise change the state of bugs.
>
this is currently being worked on.
___
Develo
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:49 PM, wrote:
> On 11/16/11 6:07 PM, "ext Sven Anderson" wrote:
>>Am 02.11.2011 11:14, schrieb Olivier Goffart:
>>> But am I alone to think that 3 weeks of waiting time is a lot?
>>> 15 work day is a lot, how about reducing it to something between 7 and
>>>10
>>> work
On 11/16/11 6:07 PM, "ext Sven Anderson" wrote:
>Am 02.11.2011 11:14, schrieb Olivier Goffart:
>> But am I alone to think that 3 weeks of waiting time is a lot?
>> 15 work day is a lot, how about reducing it to something between 7 and
>>10
>> work days?
>
>OTOH, is this really a time-critical pro
Am 02.11.2011 11:14, schrieb Olivier Goffart:
> But am I alone to think that 3 weeks of waiting time is a lot?
> 15 work day is a lot, how about reducing it to something between 7 and 10
> work days?
OTOH, is this really a time-critical process? In doubt I would choose
the longer option, not t
I'll chime in with a +1 from me as well.
Looks good.
--
.marius
On 11/2/11 5:55 AM, "ext lars.kn...@nokia.com"
wrote:
>+1 from me :)
>
>Cheers,
>Lars
>
>On 11/1/11 5:00 PM, "Peter Hartmann" wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt
>>project.
>
On Nov 2, 2011, at 11:52 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 de November de 2011 11:14:47 Olivier Goffart wrote:
>> On Tuesday 01 November 2011 16:00:30 Peter Hartmann wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt
>>> project.
>>>
>>>
2011/11/2 Thiago Macieira :
>> But am I alone to think that 3 weeks of waiting time is a lot?
>> 15 work day is a lot, how about reducing it to something between 7 and 10
>> work days?
>
> I think the number was chosen so that people who might be on vacations have
> the time to react. But I agree
Nope, I also think it is a bit too much. I think it is around a week in
the WebKit project
Kenneth
On 02/11/11 11.14, "ext Olivier Goffart" wrote:
>On Tuesday 01 November 2011 16:00:30 Peter Hartmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt
>>p
On Wednesday, 2 de November de 2011 11:14:47 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 November 2011 16:00:30 Peter Hartmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt
> > project.
> >
> > Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code
On Tuesday 01 November 2011 16:00:30 Peter Hartmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt project.
>
> Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and knows
> Qt very well, being a KDE contributor since the very beginning.
>
>
+1 from me :)
Cheers,
Lars
On 11/1/11 5:00 PM, "Peter Hartmann" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt
>project.
>
>Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and knows
>Qt very well, being a KDE contributor since the very begin
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Peter Hartmann
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt project.
>
> Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and knows
> Qt very well, being a KDE contributor since the very beginning.
>
> Shane
Second :-)
On 02/11/11 10.08, "ext Simon Hausmann" wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 04:00:30 PM ext Peter Hartmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt
>>project.
>>
>> Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and
On 02.11.11 10:08, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 04:00:30 PM ext Peter Hartmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt project.
>>
>> Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and knows
>> Qt very well,
On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 04:00:30 PM ext Peter Hartmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt project.
>
> Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and knows
> Qt very well, being a KDE contributor since the very beginni
lf Of Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 16:08
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] proposing Richard Moore as approver
>
> On Tuesday, 1 de November de 2011 16:00:30 Peter Hartmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > hereby I would like
On Tuesday, 1 de November de 2011 16:00:30 Peter Hartmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt project.
>
> Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and knows
> Qt very well, being a KDE contributor since the very beginning.
>
Hello,
hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt project.
Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and knows
Qt very well, being a KDE contributor since the very beginning.
Shane Kearns and Martin Petersson second this proposal.
Please raise any
21 matches
Mail list logo
