On Wednesday 21 May 2008 12:56, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-21 11:46:57]:
>
> > On Wednesday 21 May 2008 06:42, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 21:58:02]:
> > >
> > > > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 12:56, Florent Daignière wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-21 11:46:57]:
>
> > On Wednesday 21 May 2008 06:42, Florent Daignière wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 21:58:02]:
> > >
> > > > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, inclu
* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-21 11:46:57]:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2008 06:42, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 21:58:02]:
> >
> > > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
> support
> > > for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this m
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 06:42, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 21:58:02]:
>
> > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
support
> > for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
> > longer any reason to stick to
* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 21:58:02]:
> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support
> for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
> longer any reason to stick to java 1.4.
>
> Comments?
Last time I was the one who strongly obje
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-21 11:46:57]:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2008 06:42, Florent Daignière wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 21:58:02]:
> >
> > > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
> support
> > > for all the
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 06:42, Florent Daignière wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 21:58:02]:
>
> > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
support
> > for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
> > longer any
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 21:58:02]:
> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support
> for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
> longer any reason to stick to java 1.4.
>
> Comments?
Last time I was the on
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Sunday 18 May 2008 11:51, Daniel Cheng wrote:
>> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
> support
>> > for all the new 1.5 language feature
On Monday 19 May 2008 13:00, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 19 May 2008 11:48, Sven-Ola Tuecke wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > yes - works. Java memory usage is a bit higher as with the sun-vm. Reason
> > may be: loading native*.so grabs java mem under gcj while the sun-vm grabs
> > system memory.
On Monday 19 May 2008 11:48, Sven-Ola Tuecke wrote:
> Hey,
>
> yes - works. Java memory usage is a bit higher as with the sun-vm. Reason
> may be: loading native*.so grabs java mem under gcj while the sun-vm grabs
> system memory. "top" shows ~equal usage. GC is active and runs also under
> GCJ
Hey,
yes - works. Java memory usage is a bit higher as with the sun-vm. Reason
may be: loading native*.so grabs java mem under gcj while the sun-vm grabs
system memory. "top" shows ~equal usage. GC is active and runs also under
GCJ. While poking around, I noticed a high number of hash entries (
On Sunday 18 May 2008 11:51, Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
support
> > for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
> > longer any reason to stic
On Sunday 18 May 2008 06:56, Sven-Ola T?cke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while ./freenet/ compiles with 1.4, you already need 1.5 for ./contrib/bdb
> (yes I know, nobody else want to recompile freenet-ext).
:(
So it works?
>
> // Sven-Ola
>
> Am Samstag 17 Mai 2008 22:58:02 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> >
On Sunday 18 May 2008 04:14, Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Juiceman wrote:
> > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Matthew Toseland
> > wrote:
> >> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
support
> >> for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO
On Monday 19 May 2008 13:00, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 19 May 2008 11:48, Sven-Ola Tuecke wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > yes - works. Java memory usage is a bit higher as with the sun-vm. Reason
> > may be: loading native*.so grabs java mem under gcj while the sun-vm grabs
> > system memory.
On Monday 19 May 2008 11:48, Sven-Ola Tuecke wrote:
> Hey,
>
> yes - works. Java memory usage is a bit higher as with the sun-vm. Reason
> may be: loading native*.so grabs java mem under gcj while the sun-vm grabs
> system memory. "top" shows ~equal usage. GC is active and runs also under
> GCJ
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Matthew Toseland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 18 May 2008 11:51, Daniel Cheng wrote:
>> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
> support
>>
Hey,
yes - works. Java memory usage is a bit higher as with the sun-vm. Reason
may be: loading native*.so grabs java mem under gcj while the sun-vm grabs
system memory. "top" shows ~equal usage. GC is active and runs also under
GCJ. While poking around, I noticed a high number of hash entries (
On Sunday 18 May 2008 11:51, Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Matthew Toseland
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
support
> > for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
> > longer
On Sunday 18 May 2008 06:56, Sven-Ola Tücke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while ./freenet/ compiles with 1.4, you already need 1.5 for ./contrib/bdb
> (yes I know, nobody else want to recompile freenet-ext).
:(
So it works?
>
> // Sven-Ola
>
> Am Samstag 17 Mai 2008 22:58:02 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> >
On Sunday 18 May 2008 04:14, Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Matthew Toseland
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
support
> >> for a
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support
> for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
> longer any reason to stick to java 1.4.
>
> Comments?
>
ECJ is quite stable.
Now, we
Hi,
while ./freenet/ compiles with 1.4, you already need 1.5 for ./contrib/bdb
(yes I know, nobody else want to recompile freenet-ext).
// Sven-Ola
Am Samstag 17 Mai 2008 22:58:02 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
> support for al
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Matthew Toseland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support
> for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
> longer any reason to stick to java 1.4.
>
> Comments?
>
ECJ is qu
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Juiceman wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support
>> for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
>> longer any reason to stick
Hi,
while ./freenet/ compiles with 1.4, you already need 1.5 for ./contrib/bdb
(yes I know, nobody else want to recompile freenet-ext).
// Sven-Ola
Am Samstag 17 Mai 2008 22:58:02 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full
> support for al
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support
> for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
> longer any reason to stick to java 1.4.
>
Are the opensource jvm's up to 1.5? If so
GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support
for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
longer any reason to stick to java 1.4.
Comments?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not availabl
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Matthew Toseland
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support
>> for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that ther
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Matthew Toseland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support
> for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
> longer any reason to stick to java 1.4.
>
Are the opensource jvm'
GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support
for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no
longer any reason to stick to java 1.4.
Comments?
pgpE1QU7ZKe6r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
D
32 matches
Mail list logo