On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 15:55:30 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
For now I say we continue as before, and work toward this new
approach.
Being relatively new to this community, what is the status quo
for including new modules / rewrites of old modules? At some
point in the next few days
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:23:21 +0200
John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
At some
point in the next few days will std.process just become the new
version?
In Git master, yes. And then it'll be part of the next official DMD
release (2.063) whenever that comes out.
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 18:55:06 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:23:21 +0200
John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
At some point in the next few days will std.process just
become the new version?
In Git master, yes. And then it'll be part of the next
05.04.2013 6:04, Stephen Jones пишет:
https://github.com/Ste3e/Guigle/ is the link. The wiki has been written.
If it is not viewable it will be that I have done something wrong, or
have not done something I should with GIT... it is new to me.
I was thinking there may be a problem getting Guigle
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:kk6llv$29sl$1...@digitalmars.com...
I'll stay at Aloft (http://goo.gl/CHmzw) and will drive a compact
rental. Will gladly pick up people to and fro that hotel.
Andrei
Hey Andrei, you still got room in your car? I'm thinking of staying at a
hotel
Hi,
Since macro is reserved perhaps D can introduce AST manipulating
macros.
Suminda
Well perhaps I am too hasty. I'll wait and see what is happening.
BTW: Thanks for the support. ;)
On 2013-04-21 09:57, Suminda Dharmasena wrote:
Hi,
Since macro is reserved perhaps D can introduce AST manipulating macros.
Suminda
The original idea with the macro keyword was to introduce AST macros.
Although nothing has happened yet. People have been talking about it
from time to time
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 07:57:51 UTC, Suminda Dharmasena
wrote:
Hi,
Since macro is reserved perhaps D can introduce AST
manipulating macros.
Suminda
Hi!
As far as I can remember, macros have been deferred to D3 because
it has mixins and templates, so one can easily manipulate code in
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 01:04:04 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 18:00:50 UTC, Namespace wrote:
The fact is, there's much more to any change than simply
implementing it. Changes break unexpected things. There are
always extra corner cases not considered. There are
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 02:50:02 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
If that is your concern then the DIP36 is a very bad answer to
it :
- It require extra anotation, which wont be added most of the
time.
Automatic annotations are indicators of broken language. If
someone will forget this one, he
Through Reddit I've seen this interesting report about C++14:
http://isocpp.org/blog/2013/04/trip-report-iso-c-spring-2013-meeting
Variable templates: sometimes in D I've felt a little desire for
a shorter syntax, a templated alias:
alias Foo(T) = Bar!(T, red);
But in the end I think this
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 12:08:54 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Arrays#parallelSort uses Fork/Join framework introduced in Java
7 to assign the sorting tasks to multiple threads available in
the thread pool. This is called eating your own dog food.
Fork/Join implements a work stealing algorithm
dsimcha:
I abandoned because I was disappointed at how poorly most of it
was scaling in practice, probably due to memory bandwidth.
Then do you know why the Java version seems to be advantageous
(with four cores)?
Bye,
bearophile
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 13:30:32 UTC, bearophile wrote:
dsimcha:
I abandoned because I was disappointed at how poorly most of
it was scaling in practice, probably due to memory bandwidth.
Then do you know why the Java version seems to be advantageous
(with four cores)?
Bye,
bearophile
Hi,
Since Digitalmars has expertise in C++ and D it can release the
compiler project such that:
- separate grammar definition
- parser
- compile to intermediate like LLVM but using the Digitalmars
infrastructure
This will help other language projects re use this technology.
Suminda
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 15:09:48 UTC, Suminda Dharmasena
wrote:
- separate grammar definition
This is being worked on:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/iabqtohohovkxjwtw...@forum.dlang.org
Digitalmars (i.e. Walter Bright) is a big part of D development
but it is primarily a community
Dynamic Arrays: they replace the variable-sized stack-allocated
arrays of C99. I'd like something like this in D2 (Issue 9832)
with a better integration with the type system.
With some more changes:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130415/078426.html
Bye,
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 02:50:02 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
If that is your concern then the DIP36 is a very bad answer to
it :
- It require extra anotation, which wont be added most of the
time.
It's possible to make it an error to pass a stack variable to a
non-'scope' ref parameter. Or to
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 10:55:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
The DIP for instance, consider that const scope ref is
semantically equivalent to pass by value, when it isn't (and
not only for performance reasons, but for aliasing reasons).
Nothing is considered about it.
At least some objections
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 16:08:55 UTC, Zach the Mystic wrote:
Would there be a difference between the type of o and o2, or of
o2 and o3? There is inconsistency, but it would be nice to find
use cases which make this inconsistency truly unworkable with
other things in the language.
('nice'
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 16:02:35 UTC, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 02:50:02 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
If that is your concern then the DIP36 is a very bad answer to
it :
- It require extra anotation, which wont be added most of the
time.
It's possible to make it an
On 04/21/2013 02:51 AM, Manu wrote:
On 21 April 2013 06:51, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 04/20/2013 05:56 PM, Dicebot wrote:
You miss quite an important point - DIP36 does not add new
feature. It
partially defines existing feature
On 04/21/2013 06:27 AM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
...
Yeah, that's kind of what I meant when I said it's a two-for-one deal.
You get to pass temps, and you get safety checking too.
I prefer to buy separate products separately.
test.d:
extern (C):
void foo(){}
alias foo bar;
$dmd -c test.d
$nm test.o
t
D _D11test12__ModuleInfoZ
w _d_dso_registry
U _Dmodule_ref
T foo
Surely the aliased symbol should appear in the object file, or am
On 4/21/13, John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely the aliased symbol should appear in the object file, or am
I missing something?
Aliases are a purely compile-time feature. Wherever they're used it's
as if the compiler rewrote the alias with the aliased symbol.
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 18:54:27 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
test.d:
extern (C):
void foo(){}
alias foo bar;
$dmd -c test.d
$nm test.o
t
D _D11test12__ModuleInfoZ
w _d_dso_registry
U _Dmodule_ref
T foo
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 18:54:27 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Surely the aliased symbol should appear in the object file, or
am I missing something?
What would you expect it to look like in the object file? A
duplicate of the foo function?
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 19:22:27 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 18:54:27 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Surely the aliased symbol should appear in the object file, or
am I missing something?
What would you expect it to look like in the object file? A
duplicate of the
Hi guys,
I've been following the forums for a while. I'm interested in
looking into D, but I understand that currently it changes often,
and is not very reliable.
I've also read that there's a new release model planned, where a
stable version of the language is released every year or two. Is
On 2013-04-21 12:36, Belzurix wrote:
Hi!
As far as I can remember, macros have been deferred to D3 because it has
mixins and templates, so one can easily manipulate code in D. However,
it's been long time since there was serious discussion about the
implementation details. I'm happy to see
On 22 April 2013 03:39, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 04/21/2013 02:51 AM, Manu wrote:
On 21 April 2013 06:51, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 04/20/2013 05:56 PM, Dicebot wrote:
You miss quite an important point - DIP36 does not add
On 22 April 2013 04:23, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 04/21/2013 06:27 AM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
...
Yeah, that's kind of what I meant when I said it's a two-for-one deal.
You get to pass temps, and you get safety checking too.
I prefer to buy separate products separately.
Apologies for another question so short after the previous one.
tempmix.d:
mixin template Foo()
{
extern(C) void foo() {}
}
mixin Foo!();
extern(C) void bar() {}
$dmd -c tempmix.d
$nm tempmix.o
t
T bar
D _D7tempmix12__ModuleInfoZ
On 04/21/2013 10:38 PM, Manu wrote:
...
That's not what scope does. Scope promises that the variables
will not
escape the scope.
That is the intention, but this formulation is awfully imprecise.
Hence nothing has been implemented.
void foo(scope ref int
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 19:58:14 UTC, Tourist wrote:
Hi guys,
I've been following the forums for a while. I'm interested in
looking into D, but I understand that currently it changes
often, and is not very reliable.
I've also read that there's a new release model planned, where
a stable
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 22:16:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
What does 'scope' bind to? How to make it bind to something
else (if at all)?
I agree this is an issue. We need to enumerate the use cases. Is
'scope' transitive or does it only apply to the first thing it
hits?
Passing an
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 15:22:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
There's a discussion that may be of interest to the larger
community:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1877
Andrei
I just want to say I'm pretty gung-ho about the idea of attribute
inference. If the
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 20:12:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/20/2013 2:27 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
If possible, could you file an enhancement request? It would
also be great if
you could add your improvement as a pull request on github!
bug submitted:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9969
Thanks for reporting.
By the way, I was compiling for Windows and had only compile time
errors.
On 2013-04-20 12:43, Diggory wrote:
Well the opengl module depends on the util module. The util module
declares a load of stuff duplicated by the windows module so importing
them both without aliasing is impossible. All I want is to import the
raw opengl and win32 functions.
Derelict is raw
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 15:49:47 UTC, Dementor561 wrote:
I have all the needed files to use Direlect3, and I have Mono-D
installed on Xamarin, I was wondering how I could put it all
together in a project.
1) Do you use windows or linux?
2) Have you built derelict3?
3) If you are using
OK, thanks I think I've got the hang of the way linking works now
- I was confused about how some things didn't seem to require
libs to work, but now I see it's because those things were
compiled into druntime.lib which was compiled into phobos.lib.
So is this correct, assuming I'm only
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 22:25:42 UTC, Roderick Gibson wrote:
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 15:49:47 UTC, Dementor561 wrote:
I have all the needed files to use Direlect3, and I have
Mono-D installed on Xamarin, I was wondering how I could put
it all together in a project.
If you want to
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 15:21:00 UTC, Dementor561 wrote:
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 22:25:42 UTC, Roderick Gibson
wrote:
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 15:49:47 UTC, Dementor561 wrote:
I have all the needed files to use Direlect3, and I have
Mono-D installed on Xamarin, I was wondering
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 15:21:00 UTC, Dementor561 wrote:
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 22:25:42 UTC, Roderick Gibson
wrote:
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 15:49:47 UTC, Dementor561 wrote:
I have all the needed files to use Direlect3, and I have
Mono-D installed on Xamarin, I was wondering
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 18:13:38 UTC, Roderick Gibson wrote:
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 15:21:00 UTC, Dementor561 wrote:
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 22:25:42 UTC, Roderick Gibson
wrote:
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 15:49:47 UTC, Dementor561 wrote:
I have all the needed files to use
Well, sorta. When I add import derelict.glfw3.glfw3; it says the
library could not be resolved... Do I need to add something to
the library somewhere?
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 19:49:14 UTC, Dementor561 wrote:
Well, sorta. When I add import derelict.glfw3.glfw3; it says
the library could not be resolved... Do I need to add something
to the library somewhere?
Any library you use you have to add to the project linker
settings. Derelict3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9971
--- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-04-20 23:10:56 PDT ---
I think this is a bug.
Inside template function, the name 'goo' should be resolved to the instantiated
function 1st, then rewritten to template 'goo' if needed.
For
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9971
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2013-04-20 23:41:27 PDT
---
Yes, you are both right.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9963
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9952
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-04-21 03:26:18 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9972
Summary: [asm] missing REX.B when addressing some byte
registers
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9972
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9965
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@dawg.eu
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9965
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-04-21 04:13:51 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9969
Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |critical
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9973
Summary: ICE for selective import in compiler generated try
finally body
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9974
Summary: immutable class constructor is broken
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9975
Summary: pointsTo asserts because of false pointer in union
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9974
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9449
John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9449
--- Comment #8 from John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com 2013-04-21
17:27:06 BST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
Seems to be related to bug 8518.
Thanks for founding. The root of
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9449
Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9449
--- Comment #10 from John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com 2013-04-21
19:56:15 BST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #7)
I'm pretty sure the use of void[] in _memset128ii is simply so as to have a
128bit data type.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9449
--- Comment #11 from John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com 2013-04-21
20:11:09 BST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
There is no D style array passing happening here, static or otherwise,
it's just pointers.
Sorry, mistake.
There is an
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9965
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-04-21 12:27:30 PDT ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9974
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-04-21 12:29:07 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9941
--- Comment #2 from Igor Stepanov wazar.leoll...@yahoo.com 2013-04-21
12:59:45 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is currently allowed:
class Foo {
int f;
this(int a) { f = a; }
}
const foo = new Foo(42);
void main() {}
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9965
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9974
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9952
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
73 matches
Mail list logo
