I actually don't feel final by default is a big deal at all. Of
all the factors that caused the poor performance that was
discussed in the original post, final is the least significant
one, only caused 5% to %7 of a speed penalty in a heavily
recursive and looping program. Because of this I thi
Am 01.06.2013 05:08, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Friday, May 31, 2013 23:59:45 Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
Making everything final by default would IMO kind of break
automated mock classes generation for unit testing,
automatic proxy class generation for DB entities, and
other OOP niceities.
Then
Oh cool, good to know this has been fixed. You are right, I just
verified with DMD 2.063 and the generated code was good! Sorry
about the noise.
On Saturday, 1 June 2013 at 06:28:45 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Are you sure that that still allocates? I thought that that had
been fixed. If
it h
On Saturday, June 01, 2013 08:16:47 finalpatch wrote:
> This form is nice:
>
> int[3] x = [1,2,3];
>
> But it is horribly inefficient because it
>
> 1. allocates a dynamic array from the GC
> 2. writes 1,2,3 to the dynamic array
> 3. copies the 1,2,3 back to the static array
Are you sure that t
I'm adding D-style ranges to my new C# collections library. In
case anyone would like to comment, please see here:
http://loyc-etc.blogspot.ca/2013/06/d-style-ranges-in-c-net.html
This form is nice:
int[3] x = [1,2,3];
But it is horribly inefficient because it
1. allocates a dynamic array from the GC
2. writes 1,2,3 to the dynamic array
3. copies the 1,2,3 back to the static array
Or one can write:
int[3] x;
x[0] = 1;
x[1] = 2;
x[2] = 3;
That is a lot of typing, but a
On Saturday, 1 June 2013 at 02:03:07 UTC, Manu wrote:
So let's talk about garbage collection, and practical
strategies to avoid
allocation.
Discuss... (or perhaps, "destroooy")
Here is my take:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/tftjtzmfuauxwcgco...@forum.dlang.org
Sorry, I didn't see your new disc
On Saturday, 1 June 2013 at 05:45:38 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
This would make D the truely universal language it was intended
to be.
This is a large undertaking, but I think there is no technical
hurdle preventing it to succeed. IBasically it's only a matter of
sweat. In fact I believe it has a m
In the "Rust based provocation thread", I think Adam Ruppe's work
went largely overlooked. He basically created a minimal D that
runs on bare metal, proving thus that D can be used fruitfully on
small embedded devices in place of C.
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 15:45:04 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
GCC has a non-standard extension to do this, I've used it to get great
performance wins writing emulators. I love this feature, love to see it in
D!
On 1 Jun 2013 15:30, "Alex Rønne Petersen" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure this has been brought up before, but I feel I need to bring it up
> again (beca
Hi,
I'm sure this has been brought up before, but I feel I need to bring it
up again (because I'm going to be writing a threaded-code interpreter):
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Labels-as-Values.html
This is an incredibly important extension. The final switch statement is
not a replaceme
On Saturday, 1 June 2013 at 04:16:44 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[snip]
The situation is even
worse with narrow strings (assuming that put works with them -
I'm not sure
that it does at the moment) given that even if you knew their
length (which
you wouldn't if you were going by hasLength), yo
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 19:17:05 UTC, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
On 5/31/2013 4:42 AM, Manu wrote:
People already have to type 'override' in every derived class,
and
they're happy to do that. Requiring to type 'virtual' in the
base is
hardly an inconvenience by contrast. Actually, it's quite
or
On Saturday, 1 June 2013 at 02:58:59 UTC, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
Well, the discussions at dconf convinced me. Certainly, at
this point, I think that the only semi-viable excuse for not
making functions non-virtual by default is the code breakage
that it would cause, and given how surprisingly
On Saturday, June 01, 2013 04:47:39 Brad Anderson wrote:
> I played around with adding an overload that accepted an output
> range to some of the std.string functions identified in my run of
> -vgc over phobos[1] (after Jonathan pointed out this is probably
> the best approach and is already what f
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 21:35:46 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Just to be clear (not sure if it came across or not), I was
[attempting to] make a joke about "Ahh, you love being
corrected? Well
then I'll be nice and correct you now! Enjoy, and you're
welcome!"
Really it's more contradiction tha
On Saturday, 1 June 2013 at 02:47:40 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
static
arrays would need some sort of wrapper to make them output
ranges I believe unless it was decided that put() should work
by replacing the front and calling popFront for them (which I
kind of doubt is the desired behavior).
On Friday, May 31, 2013 23:59:45 Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
> Making everything final by default would IMO kind of break
> automated mock classes generation for unit testing,
> automatic proxy class generation for DB entities, and
> other OOP niceities.
Then just mark them all as virtual if you don't
On 05/31/2013 10:27 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday, June 01, 2013 09:04:50 Manu wrote:
>> **applause**
>> Someone other than me said it, out loud!
>> This is a magnificent day! :)
>
> Well, the discussions at dconf convinced me. Certainly, at this point, I
> think
> that the only semi
On 05/31/2013 10:27 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday, June 01, 2013 09:04:50 Manu wrote:
>> **applause**
>> Someone other than me said it, out loud!
>> This is a magnificent day! :)
>
> Well, the discussions at dconf convinced me. Certainly, at this point, I
> think
> that the only semi
On Saturday, 1 June 2013 at 02:16:02 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
just to toss in my quick thoughts, I wrote a couple comments on
the recent reddit thread about using D with a minimal runtime
and some of the talk may be relevant here too:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1fc9jt/dmd_20
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 04:31:33AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> Another thought for a task: the build scripts. The manual labour
> needed to build and install DMD, druntime and Phobos is frustrating.
> Ideally it'd be nice to have a solution like LDC, where druntime and
> Phobos are git
Another thought for a task: the build scripts. The manual labour
needed to build and install DMD, druntime and Phobos is
frustrating. Ideally it'd be nice to have a solution like LDC,
where druntime and Phobos are git submodules and they get built
and installed via one simple script (for LDC yo
just to toss in my quick thoughts, I wrote a couple comments on
the recent reddit thread about using D with a minimal runtime and
some of the talk may be relevant here too:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1fc9jt/dmd_2063_the_d_programming_language_reference/ca94mek
Some little th
On 1 June 2013 12:02, bearophile wrote:
> Manu:
>
>
> Building DMD with MSVC results in a compiler that runs MUCH MUCH faster.
>> In the interest of making DMD releases as fast as possible, this should be
>> standardised.
>>
>
> How much faster?
> And how much time does it take to compile DMD it
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 23:32:36 UTC, Manu wrote:
Building DMD with MSVC results in a compiler that runs MUCH
MUCH faster.
... Numbers?
Purely out of academic curiosity, as I'm a GNU/Linux user :-)
Manu:
Building DMD with MSVC results in a compiler that runs MUCH
MUCH faster.
In the interest of making DMD releases as fast as possible,
this should be
standardised.
How much faster?
And how much time does it take to compile DMD itself? I compile
DMD almost every day, so I am interested i
So let's talk about garbage collection, and practical strategies to avoid
allocation.
GC related discussions come up basically every day, perhaps multiple times
a day on IRC, and the recent reddit 2.063 release thread is dominated by
C++ programmers who are keenly interested in D, but are scared b
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 07:18:38 UTC, SeanVn wrote:
I looked at the D programming language a few years ago and
though it was good. Then I ran into trouble. The language was
in a state of flux. I would write code and with the next
version of D it would no longer work. The same thing was
h
On 5/31/13 4:42 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/31/2013 10:47 AM, David Gileadi wrote:
On 5/31/13 10:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
... I'm a bit weary of ...
I keep seeing people use this phrase; shouldn't it be "wary"?
Not meaning to pick on you, Andrei; it's just that this time was the
t
On Saturday, June 01, 2013 09:04:50 Manu wrote:
> **applause**
> Someone other than me said it, out loud!
> This is a magnificent day! :)
Well, the discussions at dconf convinced me. Certainly, at this point, I think
that the only semi-viable excuse for not making functions non-virtual by
defaul
On 6/1/13, Manu wrote:
> Building DMD with MSVC results in a compiler that runs MUCH MUCH faster.
> In the interest of making DMD releases as fast as possible, this should be
> standardised.
Just one thing: Before attempting to build git-head, the following
pull is required:
https://github.com/D-
Wow! That's so very cool! We can make it even nicer with
template Unroll(alias CODE, alias N, alias SEP="")
{
enum t = replace(CODE, "%", "%1$d");
enum Unroll = iota(N).map!(i => format(t, i)).join(SEP);
}
And use % as the placeholder instead of the ugly %1$d:
mixin(Unroll!("v1[%]*v2[%]
On 31/05/13 23:58, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 00:48:47 -0400, Peter Williams
That makes programming much easier, doesn't it. I'll just avoid it by
using:
a = a ~ b;
instead of:
a ~= b;
If you care nothing for performance, this certainly is a way to go.
where I think
On 5/31/13 5:35 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 17:24:38 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/31/13 4:50 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:43:51 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/31/13 1:47 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
Not meaning to pick on you, Andrei;
On 5/31/13 6:53 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I love self-contradictory / self-referential jokes...
People say I'm indecisive, but I'm not sure about that.
-- YHL, CONLANG
People tell me that I'm skeptical, but I don't believe it.
Not to mention Obama's one: "My job is to be P
Building DMD with MSVC results in a compiler that runs MUCH MUCH faster.
In the interest of making DMD releases as fast as possible, this should be
standardised.
On 5/31/13 3:55 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, June 01, 2013 00:29:48 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/31/13, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
how about we create a table of big tasks on dwiki
Thinking about this more, what we'd really need is software that does
this. Editing wiki tables is too m
On 1 June 2013 09:15, bearophile wrote:
> Manu:
>
> On 1 June 2013 01:12, bearophile wrote:
>>
>> Manu:
>>>
>>>
>>> Frankly, this is a textbook example of why STL is the spawn of satan.
>>> For
>>>
some reason people are TAUGHT that it's reasonable to write code like
this.
Manu:
On 1 June 2013 01:12, bearophile
wrote:
Manu:
Frankly, this is a textbook example of why STL is the spawn
of satan. For
some reason people are TAUGHT that it's reasonable to write
code like
this.
There are many kinds of D code, not everything is a high
performance
ray-tracer
On 1 June 2013 02:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Friday, May 31, 2013 19:42:55 Manu wrote:
> > On 31 May 2013 14:06, deadalnix wrote:
> > > On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 02:56:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > >> On 5/30/13 9:26 PM, finalpatch wrote:
> > >>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.**co
On 1 June 2013 01:12, bearophile wrote:
> Manu:
>
>
> Frankly, this is a textbook example of why STL is the spawn of satan. For
>> some reason people are TAUGHT that it's reasonable to write code like
>> this.
>>
>
> There are many kinds of D code, not everything is a high performance
> ray-trac
On Saturday, June 01, 2013 00:29:48 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 5/31/13, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> > how about we create a table of big tasks on dwiki
>
> Thinking about this more, what we'd really need is software that does
> this. Editing wiki tables is too much work, and it's hard to keep
> tra
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:35:43PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2013 17:24:38 -0400
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
> > On 5/31/13 4:50 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > > On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:43:51 -0400
> > > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
> > >> On the contrary I love being
On 5/31/13, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> how about we create a table of big tasks on dwiki
Thinking about this more, what we'd really need is software that does
this. Editing wiki tables is too much work, and it's hard to keep
track of certain things (e.g. how much time has passed since someone
appli
On 05/31/2013 02:54 PM, Byron Heads wrote:
...
The question is which is more optimal for the MRV style of programming
// here the compiler can decide the best way to return the two ints,
// probably in two registers, maybe even better for inlining
(int, int) positionMRV() { return 1, 2; }
// h
I don't think it works that way.
Yaa, I did exaggerate it a little, and didn't say it properly.
What I meant is that if that assignment operator is implemented,
I would port my engineering/math libraries I use at my work to D,
and try to convince my colleagues to use D with my libraries. All
On Fri, 31 May 2013 17:24:38 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 5/31/13 4:50 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:43:51 -0400
> > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/31/13 1:47 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
> >>
> >>> Not meaning to pick on you, Andrei; it's just that this ti
On 5/31/13 4:50 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:43:51 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/31/13 1:47 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
Not meaning to pick on you, Andrei; it's just that this time was the
tipping point for the editor in me to kick in :)
On the contrary I love bei
On Fri, 31 May 2013 23:05:20 +0200
"Aleksandar Ruzicic" wrote:
> On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 21:00:05 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 May 2013 19:50:06 +0200
> > "Adam D. Ruppe" wrote:
> >>
> >> BTW I suck at apache config and hate doing it
> >
> > Me, too. I run Nginx on my server the
On 05/31/2013 04:13 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
Given the release of 2.063, it would be good to upgrade. Clearly I could
download the deb and rpm files and put them in my local repository.
However, there is the D APT repository and it seems good to use this
instead for Debian.
I wonder if it would
Concerning dstep,
I compiled it recently (Ubuntu 12.04 32 bits system) and it wasn't as
straightforward as it was described in the README file, nor was it that
complicated to have it work. I'll outline my experience below for those
interested.
first step that needed some care was the compila
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 21:00:05 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 19:50:06 +0200
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote:
BTW I suck at apache config and hate doing it
Me, too. I run Nginx on my server these days. One of the things
I like
about it is that its configuration is so much easier
On Fri, 31 May 2013 19:50:06 +0200
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote:
>
> BTW I suck at apache config and hate doing it
Me, too. I run Nginx on my server these days. One of the things I like
about it is that its configuration is so much easier to deal with. It
still isn't trivial, and I still have to think
On 05/31/2013 10:42 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Some big features that come to mind, just off the top of my head (and
> these are language-oriented):
Redefine random number generators as reference types (monarch_dodra already did
a bunch of work in this direction). This needs to be worked out an
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:43:51 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 5/31/13 1:47 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
>
> > Not meaning to pick on you, Andrei; it's just that this time was the
> > tipping point for the editor in me to kick in :)
>
> On the contrary I love being corrected.
>
No you don't.
On 5/31/2013 10:47 AM, David Gileadi wrote:
On 5/31/13 10:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
... I'm a bit weary of ...
I keep seeing people use this phrase; shouldn't it be "wary"?
Not meaning to pick on you, Andrei; it's just that this time was the tipping
point for the editor in me to kick
The 2.063 release got me thinking, all of those features that were
implemented and mentioned in the changelog were basically features
which contributors picked to contribute to at a random point in time.
While Phobos has a proposal/review/voting process for new modules,
other features or changes a
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 19:51:29 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Tried, broke the directory. I recall our admin has disabled
.htaccess.
Andrei
Which hosting company do you guys use? Disabling .htaccess seems
too unprofessional..
Anyway, I was under impression that dlang.org is hosted
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 16:38:48 UTC, Rob T wrote:
The := syntax looks just like the += *= ~= syntax, which has
completely different meanings, so for some people it will only
serve to confuse them more than they already are.
BTW D does have instances of multiple ways of doing the same
thing
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 19:17:05 UTC, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
On 5/31/2013 4:42 AM, Manu wrote:
People already have to type 'override' in every derived class,
and
they're happy to do that. Requiring to type 'virtual' in the
base is
hardly an inconvenience by contrast. Actually, it's quite
or
On 5/31/13 1:50 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I'd just upload a file.html.gz (gzip file.html on your own computer) and
then try to go to dlang.org/file.html
It downloaded the file with name file.html. When opened with an editor,
it showed the garbled compressed content.
It might just work. If th
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:43:51 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/31/13 1:47 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
On 5/31/13 10:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
... I'm a bit weary of ...
I keep seeing people use this phrase; shouldn't it be "wary"?
500K hits:
https://www.google.com/#safe=off&o
On Fri, 31 May 2013 19:30:10 +0200
"Peter Alexander" wrote:
>
>
> mixin(iota(3).map!(i => format("v[%1$d]+=rhs.v[%1$d];",
> i)).join());
Dayamn! I knew CTFE had improved considerably over the last year or
so, but even I didn't expect something like that to be working already.
That's crazy! :)
On 5/31/13 1:47 PM, David Gileadi wrote:
On 5/31/13 10:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
... I'm a bit weary of ...
I keep seeing people use this phrase; shouldn't it be "wary"?
500K hits:
https://www.google.com/#safe=off&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22i%27ve+been+weary+of%22&oq=%22i%27v
On 5/31/2013 4:42 AM, Manu wrote:
People already have to type 'override' in every derived class, and
they're happy to do that. Requiring to type 'virtual' in the base is
hardly an inconvenience by contrast. Actually, it's quite orthogonal.
D tends to prefer being explicit. Why bend the rules in
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 18:14:57 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Interestingly, on Lambda the Ultimate[0] today I found an
article[1] that
discusses some of this - the Three Laws of Programming:
- What you get right, nobody mentions it.
- What you get wrong, people bitch about.
- What is difficu
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:26:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/31/13 1:17 PM, w0rp wrote:
I recommend YUI Compressor.
http://yui.github.io/yuicompressor/ I use it
for compressing JavaScript and CSS at my job, and it works
very well.
(It's also part of a Maven build script at my job, wh
So, I've been thinking about a few of the current problems with D:
- No allocators on containers
- Standard library functions doing too much GC allocation
- Escaping pointers to memory not allocated using the GC
- Implicit allocation with "~", "~=" and array literals
And I came up with something
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:12:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
I've been looking through the logs and it looks like the top
files in bytes transferred yesterday (even with the deluge of
downloads) were a number of Javascript, HTML, and CSS files.
There are programs to reduce the
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:26:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Thanks. I'm a bit weary of adding Java as a requirement for
building. Is that a legitimate concern?
I would add it as a separate make target, which is not needed for
building the website, but is ran before uploading it to
dlan
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:47:18 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
On 5/31/13 10:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
... I'm a bit weary of ...
I keep seeing people use this phrase; shouldn't it be "wary"?
Not meaning to pick on you, Andrei; it's just that this time
was the tipping point for the edi
Interestingly, on Lambda the Ultimate[0] today I found an article[1] that
discusses some of this - the Three Laws of Programming:
- What you get right, nobody mentions it.
- What you get wrong, people bitch about.
- What is difficult to understand you have to explain to people over and
over ag
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 07:43:08PM +0200, Wyatt wrote:
> On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:12:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
> >I've been looking through the logs and it looks like the top files
> >in bytes transferred yesterday (even with the deluge of downloads)
> >were a number of Javascrip
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:42:32 UTC, Steven Schveigho
I can't at the moment think of a reason why anyone would ever
use the full syntax, but I would expect it to be accessible,
and for the compiler to treat foo as a template first, function
call second.
-Steve
I do believe that the idea
On 2013-05-31, 19:47, David Gileadi wrote:
On 5/31/13 10:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
... I'm a bit weary of ...
I keep seeing people use this phrase; shouldn't it be "wary"?
Not meaning to pick on you, Andrei; it's just that this time was the
tipping point for the editor in me to kic
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:23:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't know if the server is configured to serve them gzipped.
How do I figure that out?
I'd just upload a file.html.gz (gzip file.html on your own
computer) and then try to go to dlang.org/file.html
It might just work. If t
On 5/31/13 10:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
... I'm a bit weary of ...
I keep seeing people use this phrase; shouldn't it be "wary"?
Not meaning to pick on you, Andrei; it's just that this time was the
tipping point for the editor in me to kick in :)
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:43:09 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
I may be in the minority in this, but I would prefer if some of
that were just removed entirely.
In particular, the code-running doohickey that doesn't even
work needs to die for the pathological behaviour it gives on
Firefox. For example
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:12:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
I've been looking through the logs and it looks like the top
files in bytes transferred yesterday (even with the deluge of
downloads) were a number of Javascript, HTML, and CSS files.
There are programs to reduce the
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:33:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/31/13 1:28 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
Ran it on http://dlang.org/
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130531_FM_d41bcc90232a08ecab128ed395047e63/
Got similar results. Quite dramatic. So what should I tell our
admin?
Andre
Am Fri, 31 May 2013 13:14:48 -0400
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu :
> On 5/31/13 12:48 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> > On 05/31/2013 06:34 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
> >> On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:56:17 UTC, khurshid wrote:
> >>> Why copyright 2012 not a 2013?
> >>
> >> Fixed in git.
> >
> >
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:06:19 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
Just want to share a new way I just discovered to do loop
unrolling.
template Unroll(alias CODE, alias N)
{
static if (N == 1)
enum Unroll = format(CODE, 0);
else
enum Unroll = Unroll!(CODE, N-1)~format(CODE, N-1)
On 5/31/13 1:28 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:20:14 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
There are programs to reduce the size of such files called
"minifiers". Should we use some? If so, what would the experts
recommend? We'd need ideally some command line utili
On 5/31/13 1:33 PM, Mr. Anonymous wrote:
It would be also great if you could remove that flashing after the page
is loaded.
I believe it's caused by the bodyLoad() function. Why is it even needed?
Hyphenation.
Andrei
On Fri, 31 May 2013 13:18:13 -0400, Simen Kjaeraas
wrote:
On 2013-05-31, 16:42, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
While doing some testing, I came across this behavior:
template foo(T) {
void foo() {}
}
void main()
{
foo!(int).foo();
//foo!(int)(); // this works
}
I'm not certa
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:12:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
I've been looking through the logs and it looks like the top
files in bytes transferred yesterday (even with the deluge of
downloads) were a number of Javascript, HTML, and CSS files.
There are programs to reduce the
On 5/31/13 1:17 PM, w0rp wrote:
I recommend YUI Compressor. http://yui.github.io/yuicompressor/ I use it
for compressing JavaScript and CSS at my job, and it works very well.
(It's also part of a Maven build script at my job, which is also cool.)
If you use it, I recommend --nomunge --preserve-se
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:20:14 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
There are programs to reduce the size of such files called
"minifiers". Should we use some? If so, what would the experts
recommend? We'd need ideally some command line utility that we
can deploy easily and integra
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:23:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Can we count on all modern browsers to ask for gzipped content?
Andrei
Browsers send Accept-Encoding headers to let the webserver know
if gzip is viable, and webservers send gzip if they can,
supposing they are configured to
Also, unless I'm mistaken, the dlang.org files don't appear to be
gzipped. (Content-Encoding: gzip) Using gzip should massively
reduce network IO. gzip works very well on HTML, JavaScript,
JSON, and CSS, as there are a lot of redundant words used.
Am Fri, 31 May 2013 17:58:11 +0200
schrieb "Craig Dillabaugh" :
> Do you really think that is such a big issue? I can't remember
> the last time I looked at the size of an executable I generated.
> When I am trying to learn a new language it is really not
> something I think of as a major issue.
On 5/31/13 1:19 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:12:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There are programs to reduce the size of such files called "minifiers".
Are these files gzipped? gzipping them will almost certainly give a much
bigger effect than any minifier and is tr
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 16:52:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, May 31, 2013 18:05:16 Rob T wrote:
I've seen this happen with 2.062, if you take out
-noboundscheck
it may reduce the size significantly and compile a lot faster.
Makes no sense.
My first guess would be that more ends
Andrei Alexandrescu:
There are programs to reduce the size of such files called
"minifiers". Should we use some? If so, what would the experts
recommend? We'd need ideally some command line utility that we
can deploy easily and integrate with the build process.
Alternatively, an online servic
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 16:31:42 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 16:58:11 +0100, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
Under 40 kilobytes! If you do the bare minimum you can get
down to about 1 KB, but at that point, you're actually
writing in mostly (inline) assembly rather than D. The co
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:12:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There are programs to reduce the size of such files called
"minifiers".
Are these files gzipped? gzipping them will almost certainly give
a much bigger effect than any minifier and is trivially easy (in
fact, it might be as si
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:12:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
I've been looking through the logs and it looks like the top
files in bytes transferred yesterday (even with the deluge of
downloads) were a number of Javascript, HTML, and CSS files.
There are programs to reduce the
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 17:12:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
I've been looking through the logs and it looks like the top
files in bytes transferred yesterday (even with the deluge of
downloads) were a number of Javascript, HTML, and CSS files.
There are programs to reduce the
On 2013-05-31, 16:42, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
While doing some testing, I came across this behavior:
template foo(T) {
void foo() {}
}
void main()
{
foo!(int).foo();
//foo!(int)(); // this works
}
I'm not certain, but it could be ambiguity:
template foo(T) {
struct fo
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
