Are there plans for including a double linked list in phobos? Maybe
one backed by an array like .NET's List or Java's ArrayList.
If so, when?
Thanks
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 15:34:05 %u wrote:
> Are there plans for including a double linked list in phobos? Maybe
> one backed by an array like .NET's List or Java's ArrayList.
>
> If so, when?
Array is the equivalent of Java's ArrayList. It's Java's LinkedList which is a
doubly-linked lis
On 1/26/11 6:20 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 15:34:05 %u wrote:
Are there plans for including a double linked list in phobos? Maybe
one backed by an array like .NET's List or Java's ArrayList.
If so, when?
Array is the equivalent of Java's ArrayList. It's Java's
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:34:05 -0500, %u wrote:
Are there plans for including a double linked list in phobos? Maybe
one backed by an array like .NET's List or Java's ArrayList.
If so, when?
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcollections
LinkList there is doubly-linked.
Sorry, I don't have onli
Andrei:
> I'm also undecided on what to do about sealing, and again language
> improvements (preventing escapes of references) could lead to improved
> designs.
Language improvements need to be understood, desired, designed, and then
implemented and debugged, so what kind of syntax and semanti
On 1/27/11 3:25 AM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei:
I'm also undecided on what to do about sealing, and again language
improvements (preventing escapes of references) could lead to improved
designs.
Language improvements need to be understood, desired, designed, and then
implemented and debugged,
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
> ref returns should be guaranteed to never escape.
Should meaning they're not guaranteed now? I'm curious in what scenarios they
escape.
--
Tomek
On 1/27/11 4:48 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
ref returns should be guaranteed to never escape.
Should meaning they're not guaranteed now? I'm curious in what scenarios they
escape.
Any function can take the address of a reference (either a ref parameter
or the re
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
> On 1/27/11 4:48 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
> > Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
> >
> >> ref returns should be guaranteed to never escape.
> >
> > Should meaning they're not guaranteed now? I'm curious in what scenarios
> > they escape.
>
> Any function can take the add
On 2011-01-27 17:52:27 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
said:
On 1/27/11 4:48 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
ref returns should be guaranteed to never escape.
Should meaning they're not guaranteed now? I'm curious in what
scenarios they escape.
Any function can take t
10 matches
Mail list logo