Re: Native GTK bindings v2

2012-04-02 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:17:24 +0200 schrieb Andrej Mitrovic : > On 4/1/12, Artur Skawina wrote: > > PS. Are there any sane Cairo D binding out there? (What's "sane"? > > Well, if there's a "class" in there somewhere then it's not sane) > > $ htod cairo.h > > And the same goes for cairo_features.h

Re: UFCS for D

2012-04-02 Thread Steven Schveighoffer
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:25:10 -0400, Walter Bright wrote: On 3/30/2012 12:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote: On 3/30/2012 12:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:27:43 -0400, Walter Bright wrote: I would argue that: 3. An extension method for an argument of type template

Re: UFCS for D

2012-04-02 Thread Don Clugston
On 30/03/12 12:22, Walter Bright wrote: On 3/30/2012 2:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Andrei and I have talked about it, and we think it is because of difficulties in breaking a module up into submodules of a package. We think it's something we need to address. Eh? Other people have voiced conc

Re: video games (was Re: UFCS for D)

2012-04-02 Thread Steven Schveighoffer
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 05:37:49 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote: "Walter Bright" wrote in message news:jl6a6a$1gh$1...@digitalmars.com... Dudes, get an HD TV. It really is transformative. And yes, it kills me that my expensive old large screen standard def TV is just a POS in comparison, even thoug

Re: UFCS for D

2012-04-02 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2012-04-02 16:31, Don Clugston wrote: To be brutally honest, I don't think that's got much to do with the language. It's got to do with Phobos adopting the Big Ball Of Mud design pattern. There's no reason for the existing modules to be so huge. Eg, I created std.internal.math so that the mat

Re: video games (was Re: UFCS for D)

2012-04-02 Thread Nick Sabalausky
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message news:op.wb47llmueav7ka@localhost.localdomain... > > I currently have an HD tube tv which runs at 1080i. The nice thing about > tubes is that standard definition *does* look more normal in it. Yea. They don't make them anymore though :( > But the bad pa

Re: Russian TDPL is available for orders

2012-04-02 Thread Denis Shelomovskij
02.04.2012 21:21, Oleg Kuporosov пишет: There is good news for Russian D Developers, translated Andrey's TDPL is available for pre-orders at some online stores http://www.books.ru/books/yazyk-programmirovaniya-d-827252/ Hope it will definetelly increase Russian speaking community, so far we don

Re: Oracle Database - ocilib

2012-04-02 Thread dnewbie
It also works on Linux (I've just tested it on Debian Squeeze with Oracle Express) Rock'n'roll!

Re: Russian TDPL is available for orders

2012-04-02 Thread Dmitry Olshansky
On 02.04.2012 21:21, Oleg Kuporosov wrote: There is good news for Russian D Developers, translated Andrey's TDPL is available for pre-orders at some online stores http://www.books.ru/books/yazyk-programmirovaniya-d-827252/ Hope it will definetelly increase Russian speaking community, so far we

Nested functions should be exempt from sequential visibility rules

2012-04-02 Thread Nick Sabalausky
Regarding this: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=790 I submit that nested functions should be exempt from the usual sequential visibility rules. (Therefore, mutually recursive nested functions would become possible.) Or at the very *least*, this horrific C-like workaround should b

Re: Nested functions should be exempt from sequential visibility rules

2012-04-02 Thread Nick Sabalausky
Sorry, I didn't mean this to go into "D.announce". Reposting in the proper place... Can this one be deleted?

Re: Russian TDPL is available for orders

2012-04-02 Thread Oleg K.
"Denis Shelomovskij" wrote in message news:jldf2t$1p3s$1...@digitalmars.com... I was afraid of it and it has finally happened. Sorry, but there is only *bad* news for us. Denis, I see, haven't seen it yet, please be a little bit more positive, it anyway will inrease interest to D. We d

Re: UFCS for D

2012-04-02 Thread deadalnix
Le 02/04/2012 18:00, Jacob Carlborg a écrit : On 2012-04-02 16:31, Don Clugston wrote: To be brutally honest, I don't think that's got much to do with the language. It's got to do with Phobos adopting the Big Ball Of Mud design pattern. There's no reason for the existing modules to be so huge.