Re: sha3-d

2021-11-05 Thread dd via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 07:00:06 UTC, bauss wrote: What was the reasoning? I can't imagine it being worse than some of the terrible modules like std.json? I have nothing against the decision, but you can read the comments here: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7713 I should still a

Re: sha3-d

2021-11-05 Thread bauss via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 29 October 2021 at 15:13:38 UTC, dd wrote: When I submitted my work to Phobos[1] earlier this year, it was rejected. (Understandably) What was the reasoning? I can't imagine it being worse than some of the terrible modules like std.json? In fact it looks very nice.

Re: sha3-d

2021-11-02 Thread starcanopy via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 29 October 2021 at 15:13:38 UTC, dd wrote: Hello all! When I submitted my work to Phobos[1] earlier this year, it was rejected. (Understandably) So I made a DUB package and forgot to announce it here! Package: https://code.dlang.org/packages/sha3-d Source: https://github.com

Re: sha3-d

2021-11-01 Thread dd via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 30 October 2021 at 09:59:38 UTC, Johan wrote: The readme mentions compilation with `-b release-nobounds`. 1. These are flags for DUB (?), can you add/replace it with the conversion to actual compiler flags? I can do a manual compilation section. Though, it is documentation online

Re: sha3-d

2021-11-01 Thread dd via Digitalmars-d-announce
here! Package: https://code.dlang.org/packages/sha3-d Source: https://github.com/dd86k/sha3-d [1] https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7713 Amazing work dd! Are you considering implementing it with SIMD instructions with something like intel-intrinsics? That would be interesting, especially

Re: sha3-d

2021-10-30 Thread Johan via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 29 October 2021 at 15:33:57 UTC, dd wrote: On Friday, 29 October 2021 at 15:18:39 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: Would be cool having benchmarks comparing this to other implementations if great performance is a goal, as you already mentioned in your README it's much faster than keccack-tin

Re: sha3-d

2021-10-29 Thread Luís Ferreira via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 15:13 +, dd via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > Hello all! > > When I submitted my work to Phobos[1] earlier this year, it was > rejected. (Understandably) > > So I made a DUB package and forgot to announce it here! > > Package: https://code.d

Re: sha3-d

2021-10-29 Thread dd via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 29 October 2021 at 15:18:39 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: Awesome! Haven't had the need to use SHA-3 yet myself, but given all the other growing ecosystems where this could be of use it's nice to have this high-performance implementation already. SHA-3 has been in use in SQLite and in Eu

Re: sha3-d

2021-10-29 Thread WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 29 October 2021 at 15:13:38 UTC, dd wrote: Hello all! When I submitted my work to Phobos[1] earlier this year, it was rejected. (Understandably) So I made a DUB package and forgot to announce it here! Package: https://code.dlang.org/packages/sha3-d Source: https://github.com

sha3-d

2021-10-29 Thread dd via Digitalmars-d-announce
Hello all! When I submitted my work to Phobos[1] earlier this year, it was rejected. (Understandably) So I made a DUB package and forgot to announce it here! Package: https://code.dlang.org/packages/sha3-d Source: https://github.com/dd86k/sha3-d [1] https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7713