JJZolx;321187 Wrote:
> No, I don't. It looks like the discussion in this bug report may be
> relevant:
>
> http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5637
Thanks Jim! Yes that seems to be something similar for sure.
Zevs
--
Zevs
---
Zevs;321182 Wrote:
> ..by the way Jim do you use MusicIP integration with SC ? When looking
> at the times reported for the scanning, it seems it is clearly the
> MusicIP database that takes 95 % of the scanning time.
No, I don't. It looks like the discussion in this bug report may be
relevant:
JJZolx;321179 Wrote:
>
> It may be the external drive that's killing you. Is it either USB or
> Firewire 400? If so, internal drives would probably make scanning a
> lot faster. Another option, though, is an external drive with an eSATA
> interface, which can be just as fast as an internal.
JJZolx;321179 Wrote:
> There are two scanning options (plus the playlist only scan):
>
> - Look for new and changed music
> - Clear library and rescan everything
>
> The first is the "new & changed" scan. The second one starts all over
> from scratch and takes a lot longer.
>
>
Yes and the
Zevs;321172 Wrote:
> What do you mean with the "new & changed" scanning ? I'm using
> SqueezeCenter 7.1 and have ~54 000 tracks on an external harddrive. A
> regular scanning update of this takes up to 2 hours (depending on what
> else I'm doing on the computer, Windows Vista), and this I have to
JJZolx;321170 Wrote:
> I find the new & changed scanning to be quite fast. On my old P4
> Windows server a full scan of 21,000 Flac files takes about 26 minutes.
> A new & changed scan takes only 2:20.
>
> Your idea has been suggested before and even accepted by many people as
> a good idea. S
I find the new & changed scanning to be quite fast. On my old P4
Windows server a full scan of 21,000 Flac files takes about 26 minutes.
A new & changed scan takes only 2:20.
Your idea has been suggested before and even accepted by many people as
a good idea. Something like: you browse through
Zevs;320969 Wrote:
> Thanks Michael for the response, so you won't get the mixer info even if
> you in MIP has set it to always write the music fingerprint directly
> into the tags ?
>
> Zevs
...and if you won't I guess I'm back to my original question and
proposal, i.e. that it would be great
mherger;320819 Wrote:
> > Hi, I was looking for the same thing.
>
> Isn't this the same as Browse Music Folder to the new album? It's then
>
> added to the library.
>
> Michael
Thanks, I didn't know about that..that is better :)
--
rmckay
--
mherger;320906 Wrote:
> > But do you really get the tags and the covers and the MusicIP info
> > embedded in the files read by doing that? I thought not, but perhaps
> > I'm wrong ?
>
> I'm sorry, no. Just the tags. MIP should be updated in regular
> intervals (as defined in SC's MIP settings).
Zevs;320892 Wrote:
> Hi Michael!
>
> But do you really get the tags and the covers and the MusicIP info
> embedded in the files read by doing that? I thought not, but perhaps
> I'm wrong ?
>
> Zevs
Yes, you do.
--
jeffmeh
-
> But do you really get the tags and the covers and the MusicIP info
> embedded in the files read by doing that? I thought not, but perhaps
> I'm wrong ?
I'm sorry, no. Just the tags. MIP should be updated in regular intervals (as
defined in SC's MIP settings).
--
Michael
_
mherger;320819 Wrote:
> > Hi, I was looking for the same thing.
>
> Isn't this the same as Browse Music Folder to the new album? It's then
>
> added to the library.
>
> Michael
Hi Michael!
But do you really get the tags and the covers and the MusicIP info
embedded in the files read by doing
> Hi, I was looking for the same thing.
Isn't this the same as Browse Music Folder to the new album? It's then
added to the library.
Michael
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
rmckay;320759 Wrote:
> Hi, I was looking for the same thing. I have the same problem with a
> huge library that takes forever to rescan just to add one new album.
> I'm running the server on a linux box and noticed another file in the
> same directory as the server:
> /usr/libexec/squeezecenter
Hi, I was looking for the same thing. I have the same problem with a
huge library that takes forever to rescan just to add one new album.
I'm running the server on a linux box and noticed another file in the
same directory as the server:
/usr/libexec/squeezecenter-scanner
After a quick look at t
Brilliant Idea.
--
ewreck
ewreck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18665
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49948
___
disc
Hi!
Why isn't it possible as an aoption to specify a directory to scan when
one one wants to update ones's music database. As it is now we have the
options of deleting all and rescan all or look for new or changed music
in the full database. Both these options take loads of time if you have
a lar
18 matches
Mail list logo
