ense-discussion] Benchmarks (was Re: Clients... ugh)
>
>
> Jim Thompson wrote:
> > Chris Buechler wrote:
> >
> >> Alex DiMarco wrote:
> >>
> >>> Does anyone have benchmarks on the WRAP running fpsense?
> >>>
> >>
> >> abou
Jim Thompson wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
Alex DiMarco wrote:
Does anyone have benchmarks on the WRAP running fpsense?
about 25 Mb is the most you can expect. I wouldn't use one if you
need constant throughput of over 15 Mb for extended periods.
I assume this is Ethernet<->Ethernet.
The web GUI is no longer pokey on anything newer than beta 1.
On 2/6/06, Jim Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Buechler wrote:
>
> > Alex DiMarco wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone have benchmarks on the WRAP running fpsense?
> >>
> >
> > about 25 Mb is the most you can expect. I wouldn't use
Chris Buechler wrote:
Alex DiMarco wrote:
Does anyone have benchmarks on the WRAP running fpsense?
about 25 Mb is the most you can expect. I wouldn't use one if you
need constant throughput of over 15 Mb for extended periods.
I assume this is Ethernet<->Ethernet.
About the only thing I
Alex DiMarco wrote:
Does anyone have benchmarks on the WRAP running fpsense?
about 25 Mb is the most you can expect. I wouldn't use one if you need
constant throughput of over 15 Mb for extended periods.
BH wrote:
DarkFoon wrote:
I talked to my client again today, and told him that pfSense would be
the
best bet. I did actually look at a commercial solution (more than one,
really), some thing from D-link, and I told him the price: $6999. He
proposed that he just buy 4 firewall/routers (like t
