> On May 6, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> So who is the BDFL on this decision? It seems we need someone to stop the
> bikeshedding on the field name and what file is going to house this
> configuration data. And do we need someone to write a PEP for this proposal
> to have someth
On Fri, 6 May 2016 at 09:40 Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> So who is the BDFL on this decision? It seems we need someone to stop the
> bikeshedding on the field name and what file is going to house this
> configuration data. And do we need someone t
On 6 May 2016 at 19:14, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2016 at 09:40 Donald Stufft wrote:
>>
>>
>> On May 6, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>
>> So who is the BDFL on this decision? It seems we need someone to stop the
>> bikeshedding on the field name and what file is going to hou
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 6 May 2016 at 09:40 Donald Stufft wrote:
>>
>>
>> On May 6, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>
>> So who is the BDFL on this decision? It seems we need someone to stop the
>> bikeshedding on the field name and what file is
On Fri, 6 May 2016 at 16:58 Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 6 May 2016 at 09:40 Donald Stufft wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On May 6, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >>
> >> So who is the BDFL on this decision? It seems we need
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> What fields there will be and their semantics ...
>
>1. Format version (so just deciding on a name -- which also includes
> whether it should be top-level or in a subsection -- and initial value)
> 2. The actual bootstrap fiel
On Sat, May 7, 2016, 12:16 Chris Barker wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> What fields there will be and their semantics ...
>>
>>1. Format version (so just deciding on a name -- which also includes
>> whether it should be top-level or in a subsection --
On 8 May 2016 at 09:23, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2016, 12:16 Chris Barker wrote:
>> how is this about "bootstrapping" -- to me, bootstrapping is when you need
>> X to build X. Isn't this just regular old configuration: you need x,y to
>> build z?
>
> Sure, if you don't like the term "
On 7 May 2016 at 08:21, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 19:14, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> OK, assuming the Nick will be pronouncing, who wants to write the PEP?
>
> ... and if Nick doesn't want to pronounce, I'm willing to offer to be
> BDFL for this one. But a PEP is the first thing. (And IMO t
On Mon, 9 May 2016 at 06:42 Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 7 May 2016 at 08:21, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On 6 May 2016 at 19:14, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >> OK, assuming the Nick will be pronouncing, who wants to write the PEP?
> >
> > ... and if Nick doesn't want to pronounce, I'm willing to offer to be
>
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> The reason I think "bootstrap" is a better name at this point
I *really* don't want to add to the bike-shedding of the name at this point
-- I really don't care.
I was just trying to see if I was misunderstanding something, as it didn't
see
11 matches
Mail list logo