Brent Hagany wrote:
> The issue of making shortcuts better (and decreasing the number of
> imports in views.py files) was brought up at DjangoCon
Another angle on the issue of reducing imports is that we can do it not
with shortcuts only but by packing some smaller modules into larger
ones. For
On Aug 2, 9:50 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Brent Hagany wrote:
> > But, just to be explicit, I don't want to
> > limit the discussion just to that patch, or to render_to_response or
> > any particular shortcut. First, we should discuss the larger issue of
> > w
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Brent Hagany wrote:
> But, just to be explicit, I don't want to
> limit the discussion just to that patch, or to render_to_response or
> any particular shortcut. First, we should discuss the larger issue of
> whether technically unnecessary code (which is what any
On Aug 2, 9:14 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick
wrote:
> Simon has not justified why his particular preference for imports
> necessarily meets even the common case and why he, or somebody else,
> cannot put their own choices for common imports into a single that they
> import (pretty normal "reduce repeti
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 18:53 -0700, chairface wrote:
> On Aug 2, 8:36 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 18:05 -0700, Brent Hagany wrote:
> >
> > Putting too much weight on more or less throwaway comments in a single
> > video isn't going to be particularly useful.
>
> They
On Aug 2, 8:36 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick
wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 18:05 -0700, Brent Hagany wrote:
>
> Putting too much weight on more or less throwaway comments in a single
> video isn't going to be particularly useful.
They didn't seem to be "throwaway" to me - Simon had his requests
prepar
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 18:05 -0700, Brent Hagany wrote:
[...]
> If you watch the video, there was some disagreement with the idea
> right from the start.
Putting too much weight on more or less throwaway comments in a single
video isn't going to be particularly useful.
> The ticket that grew ou
Thanks Alex, I should have explicitly mentioned that rather than
letting the video take care of it. I'm rather ambivalent on the
common import location myself, but I am in very in favor of his stated
reason for it: reducing the number of imports. I think good shortcuts
can get us a lot of the wa
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Brent Hagany wrote:
>
> Hello Django devs,
>
> The issue of making shortcuts better (and decreasing the number of
> imports in views.py files) was brought up at DjangoCon, and now that
> 1.1 is out the door, I would like to spark some discussion on what
> direction
Hello Django devs,
The issue of making shortcuts better (and decreasing the number of
imports in views.py files) was brought up at DjangoCon, and now that
1.1 is out the door, I would like to spark some discussion on what
direction (if any) Django should take on the subject. (Relevant video
here
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Fraser Nevett wrote:
[...]
> I won't spend any time on refactoring, but I have opened a ticket
> (#11623) and created a patch to ensure the table names get properly
> quoted in the SQL (which I think is a good idea, even if actually
> using the db cache isn't!).
I
> I don't research your idea deeply but for first look it seems very
> similar or same to django-multilingual.
> http://code.google.com/p/django-multilingual/
>From the database perspective it is similar, meaning it uses the same
database structure. What I tried to write down was mostly some usag
On Aug 2, 2:48 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Fraser Nevett wrote:
>
> > I was looking at the database cache backend and noticed a number of of
> > things that might be worth improving...
>
> > * The "createcachetable" management command manually constructs and
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Fraser Nevett wrote:
>
> I was looking at the database cache backend and noticed a number of of
> things that might be worth improving...
>
> * The "createcachetable" management command manually constructs and
> executes SQL to create the table. This is seems a bi
14 matches
Mail list logo
