> I'm going to use the same trick used by USE_L10N and explained by Anssi: set
> USE_TZ to False in global_settings.py and to True in the template of
> settings.py. This preserves backwards compatibility but the new code is the
> default for new projects.
This isn't gonna work because your new
Thanks Paul, Anssi, Mikhail and Daniel for reviewing the proposal!
Here are some answers to your remarks.
On 3 sept. 2011, at 20:19, Paul McMillan wrote:
> My main concern with your proposal is that it may require two
> different code paths for a lot of code.
Currently, my best guess is:
i think this will help:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/csrf/#how-to-use-it
allink.creative
Die interdisziplinäre und
marktnahe Designagentur.
Please ask questions about using Django on the django-users mailing list.
The topic of this list is the development of Django itself.
Karen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
wassup people, am learning django by doing a small app but my form
gives this error "CSRF verification failed. Request aborted." when i
click the submit button. i've to read about CSRF but i dont it get
quite clearly. please help
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Am 25.08.2011 06:19, schrieb h3:
But this would have side effects on the non-admin templates too.. so
it's not ideal.
Maybe something like this:
TEMPLATE_STRING_IF_INVALID = {'default: '!! Invalid var !!',
'django.contrib.admin': ''}
I do a hack in my admin.py:
On 6 Sep., 09:17, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> Ole, can you please set up a a branch at github or bitbucket?
Eh, is that not overkill?
I don't think discussing this is worth anyone's time. No need to
promise anything or elevate this to a Big Decision as long as it's
about trivial
I think I might have found an issue related
to https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14849. The last comment says to
please email the django-dev group if there are any questions about the
ticket, so here I am. I've done my best to provide a complete test case.
I have an Event model with
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Guettler wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.09.2011 16:13, schrieb Luke Plant:
>> On 25/08/11 00:39, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>
>>> On principle, I have no objection to the idea of making the admin
>>> templates more robust in the presence of