I looked at this again this morning and it appears that unit tests
within a test class do run in alphabetical order after all. This is
handled by the sortTestMethodsUsing property of the TestLoader class
of the unittest lib itself. Maybe this has changed in a newer version,
but in mine (2.4.4) thi
Apparently I can't see very far... Unit tests do not run in reversed
order. It appears to be alphabetically ordered.
I'm still wondering how to abort the test runner without losing my
stack traces though.
Regards,
Simon
On May 18, 11:26 am, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I ha
On 5/18/07, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have unit tests for a particular app that take about 2 minutes to
> complete. Needless to say, adding new unit tests to this app and
> running them is a time consuming process. I know that the old unit
> tests will succeed and am ba
Ah, should have refreshed before replying...I had placed a test_a,
test_z, test_zz in a particular test class and they ran
alphabetically, but that was probably a coincidence apparently.
Too bad this can't be done (yet). Thanks for the info anyway.
regards,
Simon
On May 18, 12:49 pm, "Russell K
Hi all,
I have unit tests for a particular app that take about 2 minutes to
complete. Needless to say, adding new unit tests to this app and
running them is a time consuming process. I know that the old unit
tests will succeed and am basically only interested in the results for
the new unit test.
5 matches
Mail list logo