Hi Steve
In the DMARC FAQ, Section "Receiver Questions" they say: "If emails from
mailing lists are important to your users, you may therefore consider to
apply specific rules for emails coming from mailing lists." [1] This is
the situation right now with the DNG list: It's up to the people who do
[Redirecting back onto the mailing list for a moment, from Adrian's
sudden digression into private mail.]
Quoting Adrian Zaugg (a...@ente.limmat.ch):
> I think this DKIM issue or non-issue is just noise for others.
Concur.
But: I participate on public mailing lists in order to have
a public
Quoting Adrian Zaugg (devuan@mailgurgler.com):
> In the DMARC FAQ, Section "Receiver Questions" they say: "If emails from
> mailing lists are important to your users, you may therefore consider to
> apply specific rules for emails coming from mailing lists." [1] This is
> the situation right n
Hi Steve
In the DMARC FAQ, Section "Receiver Questions" they say: "If emails from
mailing lists are important to your users, you may therefore consider to
apply specific rules for emails coming from mailing lists." [1] This is
the situation right now with the DNG list: It's up to the people who do
On 2019-12-26 20:30, Steve Litt wrote:
Seriously, this DMARC thing, or at least the way it's implemented on
DNG, is downright dangerous. I accidentally replied onlist to yet
another, as I was researching this.
Here is one bit of advice that I use (at least metaphorically) almost
every day:
Seriously, this DMARC thing, or at least the way it's implemented on
DNG, is downright dangerous. I accidentally replied onlist to yet
another, as I was researching this.
Did you know that for some but not all DNG email, "reply to sender"
sends it to the list? That's just plain dangerous and shoul
