[DNSOP] reverse-mapping-considerations issue 15

2007-01-16 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Dear colleagues, In http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg00066.html Brett Carr suggested that some additional text noting that some RIRs have policies encouraging reverse mapping should be added to the reverse-mapping-considerations draft. I propose the following, which I thin

[DNSOP] reverse-mapping-considerations issue 14

2007-01-16 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Dear colleagues, In http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg00062.html Dean Anderson pointed out that draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations-01.txt talks about "accurate reverse mapping data" without defining the term. He moreover pointed out that the term "accurate" is

[DNSOP] reverse-mapping-considerations: ambiguity?

2007-01-16 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Dear colleagues, In http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg00062.html Dean Anderson argued that a proposed text change he offered be included instead of some language that is already in draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations-01.txt. His argument is that his proposed te

[DNSOP] reverse-mapping-considerations: issues

2007-01-16 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Dear colleagues, This is the first of four mails about issues in the draft draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations, currently at version 01. We are attempting to clear the issues as quickly as possible to the satisfaction of the working group. I believe that with the -01 draft, all the p

Re: [DNSOP] (fwd) I-D ACTION:draft-larson-dnsop-trust-anchor-00.txt

2007-01-16 Thread Edward Lewis
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-larson-dnsop-trust-anchor-00.txt What is a trust anchor? Is it a domain name or is it a specific key at a domain name? The question comes up when you mention that it should be a DR RR. Or should that be an RR set? This line is out of context: "D