I wrote:
> IIRC, the main issue is the size of l10n.xml. Parsing this takes forever.
Correction: The slowness is not during parsing, rather it's during XSLT key
preparation. I've moved this thread to the docbook-apps list.
- Mike
___
At 01:31 17/05/2002 -0600, Mike Brown wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm attempting to use Simplified DocBook 1.0b2. I have a couple of questions
>about it. I've only dabbled in DocBook before, so please forgive my ignorance
>or point me to a FAQ or more appropriate forum if this isn't the place to ask.
Hi Mike.
Norman Walsh wrote:
> | ... :)
>
> No, that's not the same thing at all. The content model of listitem in
> DocBook is required to be block content. You can't not put the para in
> there.
> [...]
> I consider it a browser bug that
>
>
> para 1
> para 2
>
>
> does not render the way yo
/ Mike Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh wrote:
|> Yes. One of the factors that contributed to the design of Simplified
|> was the design of HTML which forbids blocks in paragraphs.
|
| Good. Although, by the same reasoning, you shouldn't be doing things like
| ... :)
No,
Norman Walsh wrote:
> Yes. One of the factors that contributed to the design of Simplified
> was the design of HTML which forbids blocks in paragraphs.
Good. Although, by the same reasoning, you shouldn't be doing things like
... :)
One thing I frequently need to do is something like this:
ยท n
/ Mike Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| 1. http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/para.html shows an example wherein a
| contains an . Simplified DocBook doesn't seem to allow
| this. I just want to make sure this was a deliberate change. Is the correct
| approach in Simplified DocBook t
Hi,
I'm attempting to use Simplified DocBook 1.0b2. I have a couple of questions
about it. I've only dabbled in DocBook before, so please forgive my ignorance
or point me to a FAQ or more appropriate forum if this isn't the place to ask.
1. http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/para.html shows an e
