-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Chris Wakelin wrote:
Another thought occurred to me. It needn't be a plugin as such, as it
just needs to run before the imap process proper - see
Three reasons why this is not enough:
1) Long-time IMAP connections,
2) New mail
On 5/7/07, Esther Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the key points that came up when I researched and wrote the
"Five Things CIOs Should Know about Fighting Spam" article (http://
www.cio.com/article/28830) was that they should know the basics of
how email works. Otherwise, said plenty
Hi Timo,
You were good enough to add the -n flag to the dovecot command to output
the current *changed* config parameters (changed as compared to the
defaults) of the running dovecot process. This makes it much easier to
troubleshoot issues - thanks!
Another flag that postfix has is the -d f
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 1:28 pm, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 8 at 08:02 AM, quoth Ray:
> >It seems like your right, as this command does work when I use port
> >143, but the following is a direct copy and paste from
> >http://wiki.dovecot.org/TestPop3Installation
> >
> ># telnet your.host
On Tuesday, May 8 at 08:02 AM, quoth Ray:
It seems like your right, as this command does work when I use port
143, but the following is a direct copy and paste from
http://wiki.dovecot.org/TestPop3Installation
# telnet your.host.org 110
1 login username password
Ummm... maybe it's changed si
The shared mailbox and all its files and subdirectories are owned by the
'dovecot' user and by the 'domain users' group that all users belong to.
The ACL restrictions cause a reduction (i.e. more fine-grained
constraint) in privileges. In other words, at the system-file level,
everyone can read
Saturday 05 of May 2007 16:13:47 Łukasz Mierzwa napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> I'm using dovecot-1.0.0 on gentoo box and I have problem with
> authentication using digest-md5 and passwords stored as plain text in ldap
> database, when I use cram-md5 it works, while digest-md5 give this error
> (squirrelmail
L. Scott Loftin wrote:
dovecot config file is "new". I guess I'm trying to see how to convert or
somehow migrate he actual contents of the old .imap* (user email) files to
the new dovcot.* files. Any ideas?
This unfortunately is an mbox thing, and I've never used anything except
Maildir; it
Thanks for the quick note Troy. I did the 1.0.0 upgrade while ago. Again,
I did a fresh install of FC6 over the weekend (not an upgrade), so the
dovecot config file is "new". I guess I'm trying to see how to convert or
somehow migrate he actual contents of the old .imap* (user email) files to
th
L. Scott Loftin wrote:
Dovecot version: 1.0.rc7
I have recently upgraded from Fedora Core 4 to Fedora Core 6 (the FC6 was a
...
Is there a way to either convert the .imap* files into the new dovecot.*
files or any way to recover the email that anyone knows about?
FC4 used the older 0.99 doveco
kamran arshad wrote:
/var/log/maillog:May 8 09:33:13 lhr dovecot: auth-worker(default): mysql: Connected to 127.0.0.1 (exim)
This looks a little strange - why would there be an (exim) in parens,
are you running dovecot as your exim userid?
Regardless, my first guess is that your MySQL ins
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 12:33 am, Joseba Torre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> El Martes, 8 de Mayo de 2007 05:13, Ray escribió:
> > however, when I try to use the login method
> > (that is what the command
> > 1 login username password
> > part is, isn't it?)
>
> That seems like an imap command, and I suppose t
Adrian Barker wrote:
>
> That's right: we cannot change the way that we deliver email, at least
> in the short to medium term, so need to maintain compatibility with the
> UW IMAP server. If we do decide to write a plugin that copies new email
> from the mail spool to the IMAP inbox, is there any
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Return-Path missing, rejection reason: Not enough disk space
May 8 09:49:53 ux-2s11-9 sendmail[29618]: l487nclf029596: to="|
/etc/mail/runde", ctladdr=dvtest (31045/102), delay=00:00:15,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=prog, pri=120033, dsn=2.0.0, stat
Dovecot version: 1.0.rc7
OS: Red Hat Fedora Core 6
CPU: x86
Filesystem: Linux
I have recently upgraded from Fedora Core 4 to Fedora Core 6 (the FC6 was a
clean install, not an upgrade). Prior to the upgrade, I used Dovecot to
handle IMAP email that talked to Outlook clients. After the FC6
Hi,
I have installed Dovecot 1.0.0 on a FreeBSD6.0 machine with Exim 4.66 and
Vexim 1.5. When I restart the machine, dovecot does not load properly. The logs
of /var/log/maillog are as:
May 8 00:10:32 lhr dovecot: pop3-login: No authentication sockets found
May 8 00:10:32 lhr dovecot: child
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:58 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Usually dspam is able to either pick out the user from the signature
> > > (uid in signature setting for dspam) or from the user it's running
> > > under. I guess you're running some virtual user setup?
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, with
Jordi Moles wrote:
*Hi, I've been getting the following error from time to time since i
started to use dovecot more than one year ago:
dovecot: May 07 19:57:24 Error: auth(default): Master request
88729.43523 not found
I haven't stopped upgrading dovecot with the hope that this would be a
b
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:48 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 03:39 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote:
>
> > @@ -152,9 +153,9 @@
> > close(fd);
> >
>
> > +execl (DSPAM, DSPAM, "--user", user, "--source=error", "--stdout",
> > class_arg, sign_arg, NULL);
>
> So wi
Hello,
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
> transaction. Alternatively, enh_error can be set != 0 if call_dspam
> returns an error which can happen when dspam returns an error code or
> isn't present.
>
Yes, I found this. Which is where my patch came from.
> Not sure
Please, find the patch below. The first change is spam, sorry. The rest
is what it takes to make it work on my system. I have no tested it and
it works beautifully. If anyone is using domain stuff successfully, then
please help make this patch work. I have patched my dspam.c (in dspam)
in accordanc
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 10:36 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I understand. I have a few questions about your code. You do a case -3:
> > on enh_error, yet there is NO such entry anywhere in the code.
>
> Heh. Cruft, I guess. The code has changed a lot over time.
>
Ok, good enough.
> > A
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 18:43 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi Trever,
>
> Please copy the mailing list too.
>
I am sorry about that.
> the cron job would have to iterate through all these files and call
> dspam depending on the contents of the file.
>
> And then it all has to be atomic.
>
> I
Hi,
> > Usually dspam is able to either pick out the user from the signature
> > (uid in signature setting for dspam) or from the user it's running
> > under. I guess you're running some virtual user setup?
> >
>
> Hmm, with my dspam patched or unpatched (to ignore the domain in the
> case of pa
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 03:39 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> @@ -152,9 +153,9 @@
> close(fd);
>
> +execl (DSPAM, DSPAM, "--user", user, "--source=error", "--stdout",
> class_arg, sign_arg, NULL);
So with what configuration is that actually necessary? I know that my
configurati
Hi,
> > > Additionally, you check for 0 for a good condition, yet there is no
> > > possibility of a changed enh_error value for 0 in call_dspam nor in the
> > > function that calls it.
> >
> > Cruft too then, or just defensive coding maybe...
> >
>
> Actually, if you consider that cruft, then
*Hi, I've been getting the following error from time to time since i
started to use dovecot more than one year ago:
dovecot: May 07 19:57:24 Error: auth(default): Master request
88729.43523 not found
I haven't stopped upgrading dovecot with the hope that this would be a
bug and would be fixe
Hi,
> I understand. I have a few questions about your code. You do a case -3:
> on enh_error, yet there is NO such entry anywhere in the code.
Heh. Cruft, I guess. The code has changed a lot over time.
> Additionally, you check for 0 for a good condition, yet there is no
> possibility of a chang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Dovecot deliver used with filesystem quota, sendmail v8.13 via
.forward-mechanism causes mail loess:
May 8 09:49:53 ux-2s11-9 deliver(dvtest):
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
save failed to INBOX
May 8 09:49:53 ux-2s11-9 deliver(dvtest):
ms
29 matches
Mail list logo