Hey all,
I'm curious, has anyone been able to get outlook to do single sign on
with a linux IMAP/SMTP back end? I have it doing NTLM authentication
via the dovecot winbind module with Samba 3.2 just fine, but I have
yet to see it try to use the cached windows logon credentials.. It
appears to do
On Aug 13, 2008, at 10:32 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 14, 2008, at 1:26 AM, Sean Kamath wrote:
But the big killer is scaleability and handling multiple servers,
which is why some sort of front end like IMAPProxy are attractive.
I've heard that imapproxy isn't all that useful with
Hi All
My first post to the list, so hello world!
Having searched the list archives and the wiki for an answer to this, I
don't think it is possible. However, let me ask nonetheless...
Is it possible for a Dovecot proxy's login process (IMAP and POP3) to
include the destuser, i.e. the uid
On Aug 14, 2008, at 2:36 AM, Paul Gamble - MWEB wrote:
Is it possible for a Dovecot proxy's login process (IMAP and POP3) to
include the destuser, i.e. the uid used to authenticate to the
backend
IMAP/POP3 server, in its logging? %u gives me the uid provided by
the
client of course, but it
Pascal Gienger a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kbajwa a écrit :
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
I guess you've right but I can't post this answer at Cyrus mailing list.
I'm just trying to have my own opinion of imap server and I already have
sarcastic answer on the
Hi Timo
Thanks very much, hadn't finished my morning coffee and already a patch
:)
The patch does the trick:
- My dovecot.conf for the proxy:
...
login_log_format_elements = pid=%p user=%u method=%m rsock=%r:%b
lsock=%l:%a proto=%s %c
login_log_format = MYPROXY %s %$:
...
- gives me,
Ed W a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
kbajwa a écrit :
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
My personal experience.
Kirt
I guess you've right but I
* Mathieu Kretchner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ed W a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
kbajwa a écrit :
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
My
In any case I only have experience of dovecot and it's used in some
larger installs such as the old webmail.us, now 11 (I believe). I
think your installation is probably large enough that you might want to
do a trial migration of a couple of accounts and see if migration is a
problem.
Chris Wakelin wrote:
Another persistent IMAP Webmail app may be Web-Alpine from UW, but I
haven't tried it out yet. If it's expecting to be talking to UW-IMAP
it'll need to use persistent connections!
While it's not free, a really nice webmail that does a lot of smart
things (persistent
Hi Timo,
Thanks for your reply.
How exactly are you changing virtual users' groups? You said you're
using a single UID and GID, so from the OS point of view there's only
a single user.
Makes sense.
Either that or use a different UID for all users (or the staff users).
With ACLs you could
Hi Timo,
Thanks for your reply.
How exactly are you changing virtual users' groups? You said you're
using a single UID and GID, so from the OS point of view there's only
a single user.
Makes sense.
Either that or use a different UID for all users (or the staff users).
With ACLs you
But Timo walks through the valley of the shadow for us all.so maybe he's
entitled.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 13, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Chris Wakelin wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yea, ...
I've been meaning to tell you that should be Yeah for an informal
version of Yes, otherwise
On 8/13/2008, Mike Abbott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Post your dovecot -n output?
Here's some of it. Not very enlightening.
Why just some of it? Its not like its that much, and what you may
*think* is irrelevant, may in fact be *very* relevant...
--
Best regards,
Charles
I re-ran imaptest on an empty mail store, single client, multiple
users, using your dovecot-crlf input file, for a couple hours. Here's
the distribution of errors that imaptest reports:
100 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header DELIVERED-TO changed
167 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header CC changed
On Aug 14, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Mike Abbott wrote:
I re-ran imaptest on an empty mail store, single client, multiple
users, using your dovecot-crlf input file, for a couple hours.
Here's the distribution of errors that imaptest reports:
100 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header DELIVERED-TO changed
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:42:49 +0200, Mathieu Kretchner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed W a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
kbajwa a écrit :
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Is there a way to modify mail messages when they are downloaded using a
special login.
eg. my normal login for dovecot is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when I log in
using [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would like to download my mail
which are processed using a Perl script. The Perl script will modify the
content
You need to subscribe to the folders on the new server.
I find it just a few time after my mail but anyway thank you for your
answer !
begin:vcard
fn:Mathieu Kretchner
n:Kretchner;Mathieu
org:INRIA;Syslog
adr;dom:;;2007 route des lucioles - BP93;Sophia Antipolis;;06902 CEDEX
On Aug 14, 2008, at 11:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there a way to modify mail messages when they are downloaded
using a
special login.
In theory, yes.
eg. my normal login for dovecot is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when I
log in
using [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would like to
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 14, 2008, at 11:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to modify mail messages when they are downloaded using a
special login.
In theory, yes.
eg. my normal login for dovecot is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when I
log in
using [EMAIL
Hello All,
I've been studying dovecot for replacing my company's current system
and I got a little worried about an aspect of the dovecot's design.
I was surprised that dovecot doesn't use prefork for its mail
processes, forking a new processes for each new client connection.
Talking in the
Words by Giorgenes Gelatti [Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:38:50PM -0300]:
Hello All,
I've been studying dovecot for replacing my company's current system
and I got a little worried about an aspect of the dovecot's design.
I was surprised that dovecot doesn't use prefork for its mail
processes,
Woa!!
Do you have statistics of access/min for pop3?
Indeed it could be premature since I didn't measure any real
bottleneck. Just something that got my attention.
[]'s
giorgenes
2008/8/14 Jose Celestino [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Words by Giorgenes Gelatti [Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:38:50PM -0300]:
Sorry to bother everyone but I was wondering if it is possible for
Dovecot to handle mbox AND maildir at the same time?
Example:
I want to convert from UW Imap using mbox to Dovecot using maildir.
Do I need to convert ALL my users mbox mailboxes to maildir right away
or can I convert them
Words by Giorgenes Gelatti [Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 04:46:04PM -0300]:
Woa!!
Do you have statistics of access/min for pop3?
No, but I 'greped' 2300 logins/minute peak for a given day for *IMAP*.
Indeed it could be premature since I didn't measure any real
bottleneck. Just something that got
On Aug 14, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote:
I've been studying dovecot for replacing my company's current system
and I got a little worried about an aspect of the dovecot's design.
I was surprised that dovecot doesn't use prefork for its mail
processes, forking a new processes for
On Aug 14, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Mike Hobbs wrote:
Sorry to bother everyone but I was wondering if it is possible for
Dovecot to handle mbox AND maildir at the same time?
Sure.
I'd like to use maildir with all my new users, but I'd like to be
able to continue using mbox for my old users and
On Aug 14, 2008, at 4:42 AM, Paul Gamble - MWEB wrote:
Aug 14 10:14:03 withnail dovecot: imap-login: MYPROXY pid=6516,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], method=PLAIN, rsock=127.0.0.1:48157,
lsock=127.0.0.1:1143, proto=IMAP, secured proxy([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
started proxying to 127.0.0.1:143/pgamble*master:
2008/8/14 Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But there are even some theoretical problems with preforking. For example
the most secure way to set up your users is to use a different UNIX UID for
each user. So for preforking that means your preforked processes must run as
root until they receive
On Aug 14, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote:
2008/8/14 Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But there are even some theoretical problems with preforking. For
example
the most secure way to set up your users is to use a different UNIX
UID for
each user. So for preforking that means your
Hello all,
Today I had problems on one of the servers. Dovecot stopped working and
I got lots of Request queue is full on logs.
Aug 14 16:49:45 mailserver03 dovecot: auth(default):
ldap([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Request queue is full
Aug 14 16:49:45 mailserver03 dovecot: auth(default):
ldap([EMAIL
Hello,
I'm a developer on the Orbited project (http://www.orbited.org), which
provides a TCPSocket interface in javascript (emulated over HTTP using ajax
and comet.) This TCPSocket allows true bi-directional communication between
a web browser and an arbitrary tcp server. One of the other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:51:20 -0700, Michael Carter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a developer on the Orbited project (http://www.orbited.org), which
provides a TCPSocket interface in javascript (emulated over HTTP using
ajax
and comet.) This
On Thursday, August 14 at 07:01 AM, quoth Eric Toczek:
While it's not free, a really nice webmail that does a lot of smart
things (persistent imap connections, ldap connection pooling, and
one of the best interfaces I've seen) is Nitido's PIM
http://www.nitido.com/products/index.shtml?web_pim
35 matches
Mail list logo
