On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:44:21AM +0200, Fredrik Grönqvist wrote:
Yes, I agree that it should be in UTF-8. My specific problem is that about
80% (a rough estimate) of our users are on either Windows or webmail. Those
having passwords containing umlauts etc can log on, using their current
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 01:54:48PM +0200, Fredrik Grönqvist wrote:
Thanks for the info, a setup like this is what I opted for eventually. I
added a note to that wiki page that the query also needs to return the
nopassword -field for Dovecot 1.1+ to accept the NULL password:
Ok, good catch (I
19.11.2008 14:33, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
In case someone else is looking for info about this, this workaround
works for DB backed accounts, as you mention, but will probably not work
with an LDAP (or other) backend.
Right, it's just a hack that fits your particular setup. :-)
For a
19.11.2008 10:27, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:44:21AM +0200, Fredrik Grönqvist wrote:
Yes, I agree that it should be in UTF-8. My specific problem is that about
80% (a rough estimate) of our users are on either Windows or webmail. Those
having passwords containing
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 20:44 -0500, Neil wrote:
I've noticed that when I go to Account Info in Mail.app, and then to
the Subscription List tab, Mail.app will spin for a bit, and then
give up, without showing any folders and all the buttons are grayed out.
Does anyone know if this a
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 16:38 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
just wanted to notify you about a bug i found in 1.1.4 ACL handling:
Global ACLs are ignored, when there is no line break (i.e. owner lr
is ignored while owner lr\n works). I didn't track this down to see
if the same happens
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 13:03 +0100, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
As you can see, the non-existing foo.foo isn't returned because its
child foo.foo.foo also matches the pattern and is returned. But the
non-existing foo.bar is returned because its children don't match the
pattern. It took me
Hello,
Running dovecot 1.1.6 on centOS 5 and RHEL 5.
With the settings:
pop3_lock_session = yes
mail_privileged_group = mail
mail_location = mbox:~/:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u
mbox_read_locks = fcntl
mbox_write_locks = dotlock fcntl
and /var/spool/mail permissions:
drwxrwx--x 2 root mail
Just wanted to mention that 1.1.6 seems fine so far in our testing, and
I think the lack of reported problems on the mailing list is probably a
very good sign!
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.6.tar.gz.sig
All of this is now implemented. I think shared mailboxes/ACLs are now
fully working. The only thing left is to avoid calling
acl_lookup_dict_rebuild() after each ACL change, but rather just update
the dict directly with the changes.
Hmm. Wonder how quota behaves with shared mailboxes.. That's
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 15:57 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Nov 13, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Hi,
we're trying to solve CVE-2008-4870 = rhbz#436287 = dovecot.conf is
world readable - possible password exposure.
This problem seems to be little more complicated than we
When using proxy_maybe CRAM-MD5 authentication fails when the connection
is proxied. Is this expected behavior? Is proxy_maybe too simplified for
this case?
We're using SQL so I could rewrite the query with IFs to fake
proxy_maybe and return the password as NULL and nologin as Y, but if it
works
Hi all,
I've got an isolated test environment set up now, and am trying to figure
out how to get the index files to populate. So far, I cannot seem to get
them to appear in the /usr/local/dovecot/indexes directory as referenced
below. Here is the sql string:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/etc]#
Hi
What is the best option to notify a user that a message has arrived? The
intention is to write a script that connects to a jabber server and checks
if the user is online, so then a message is sent to user notifying him that
he has received a new message. The solution should be compatible with
On Nov 19 2008, Adam McDougall wrote:
Just wanted to mention that 1.1.6 seems fine so far in our testing, and
I think the lack of reported problems on the mailing list is probably a
very good sign!
We're running 1.1.4 in production on one machine, and have tried 1.1.5. and
1.1.6 in our test
Juan Asensio Sánchez schreef:
Hi
What is the best option to notify a user that a message has arrived? The
intention is to write a script that connects to a jabber server and checks
if the user is online, so then a message is sent to user notifying him that
he has received a new message. The
On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Brian Hayden wrote:
On Nov 19 2008, Adam McDougall wrote:
Just wanted to mention that 1.1.6 seems fine so far in our testing,
and I think the lack of reported problems on the mailing list is
probably a very good sign!
We're running 1.1.4 in production on one
On Nov 19 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
3. Don't use mbox. :)
Heh! We're on that route, but there are a lot of complicating factors
(including lots of users who have to be handled very delicately through a
conversion).
--
Brian Hayden
UMN OIT Internet Services
On Nov 19, 2008, at 9:01 PM, Rod Treweek wrote:
password_query = SELECT username as user, password,
concat('/NFS1MAILDIR/mailSysV2/',
maildir) as userdb_home, concat('maildir:/NFS1MAILDIR/
mailSysV2/',maildir,
':INDEX=/usr/local/dovecot/indexes/',maildir) as userdb_mail, 143 AS
userdb_uid,
On Nov 19, 2008, at 8:14 PM, David Jonas wrote:
When using proxy_maybe CRAM-MD5 authentication fails when the
connection
is proxied. Is this expected behavior? Is proxy_maybe too simplified
for
this case?
Fails how?
We're using SQL so I could rewrite the query with IFs to fake
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Nov 19, 2008, at 8:14 PM, David Jonas wrote:
When using proxy_maybe CRAM-MD5 authentication fails when the connection
is proxied. Is this expected behavior? Is proxy_maybe too simplified for
this case?
Fails how?
We're using SQL so I could rewrite the query with
Hi Timo,
Thanks Timo. This is great. I followed your instructions, and sure enough,
everything is working as expected now. Thank you very very much. One
question I have, What's the advantage of using prefetch? Is this a
considerable performance benefit, or is it just more or less another
Well, most of my issues are gone with adding auth cache. However, I
am having an issue. Sometimes, even though cache incorrect passwords
is disabled, new passwords do not work. It would seem that once a
user logs in with one password successfully the cache does not
automatically retry
23 matches
Mail list logo
