On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
namespace shared {
separator = .
prefix = shared.
location = maildir:/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/shared
}
So I created a few subfolders.
# cd /home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/shared
# maildirmake .sub1
# maildirmake .sub2
# chow
On Sep 22, 2009, at 3:37 AM, Steven F Siirila wrote:
I realize these are older versions, but I'd like to know specifically
whether dovecot 1.1.6 and dovecot 1.1.8 are compatible index-wise.
In particular, if we downgraded from 1.1.8 to 1.1.6 would there be any
issues with doing so?
I never bre
Hi All,
I need the install doc for dovecot on RHEL5.2, thanks a lot!! J
Best Regards
Daniel
Eric Shubert wrote:
I have 3 servers running dovecot 1.0.10. 2 of them are configured with a
shared/public namespace, but I'm having trouble getting it to work on
the third, even with 2 working examples to go by. There's something I'm
missing, and I'm hoping that someone here can see/tell what it
I have 3 servers running dovecot 1.0.10. 2 of them are configured with a
shared/public namespace, but I'm having trouble getting it to work on
the third, even with 2 working examples to go by. There's something I'm
missing, and I'm hoping that someone here can see/tell what it is.
I've created th
I realize these are older versions, but I'd like to know specifically
whether dovecot 1.1.6 and dovecot 1.1.8 are compatible index-wise.
In particular, if we downgraded from 1.1.8 to 1.1.6 would there be any
issues with doing so?
I realize there are later versions, but we've tested both of the abo
On 9/21/2009, Charles Marcus (cmar...@media-brokers.com) wrote:
> I hate this (because I have a LOT of mail and do NOT want to have to
> wait for hours for it all to download the first time I set up my account
> on a new PC),
I should have also mentioned, Sync On Demand is already possible with
th
On 9/21/2009 11:33 AM, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
>> Of course, eventually I'm sure dovecot will hit a wall where performance
>> improvements will be negligible, but for now, the difference between the
>> 1.0.x version and 1.2.x is so great that anyone who refuses to upgrade
>> is simply missing out
Quoting Charles Marcus :
That said, the biggest reason I see for upgrading often, especially for
things like dovecot, is to take advantage of the performance
improvements and new capabilities/options.
I've not seen to many lately, but maybe that is due to differences in
say mbox versus maildir
On Sep 21, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Seba wrote:
plugin {
sieve=~/Maildir/.dovecot.sieve
sieve_dir=/home/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir
}
Don't put Sieve scripts under ~/Maildir and that'll solve your
problem. Use e.g.
sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve
sieve_dir = ~/sieve
On 9/21/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> I guess I should mention that I don't really mind people asking
> questions when they're using an old version, but if it's a bug report
> there's a good chance the answer is then "upgrade".
Yours is one of the most helpful and patient attitudes I'
Hi,
I'm using Dovecot 1.2.4 with ManageSieve 0.11.9 and Sieve. All works
fine but users can subscribe to the folder "dovecot/sieve" which is
also displayed in the folders list.
protocols = imap managesieve
protocol managesieve {
listen = ip_address:2000
managesieve_logout_format = bytes
On 9/21/2009, Nikolay Shopik (sho...@inblock.ru) wrote:
>> app and starting the whole process again. dovecot deals with this more
>> gracefully than the old server (Courier), but it's still an issue
>> -offline operation would be handy sometimes, but tbird has no "hybrid"
>> mode, and again, one mu
On 9/21/2009, Charles Sprickman (sp...@bway.net) wrote:
> They've been using Thunderbird for some time and I'm finding the following
> issues there:
I highly recommend you try the new Thunderbird 3 builds (current is b3 I
believe)...
It has mucho, much IMAP improvements, too many to go into...
I guess I should mention that I don't really mind people asking
questions when they're using an old version, but if it's a bug report
there's a good chance the answer is then "upgrade".
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:03:48PM +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> The problem however is many people very dangerously and wrongly consider
> that their beloved favourite distro package, is in fact the current
> stable and the only one that exists. I'm horrified by the number of
> people responsible fo
On 21.09.2009 8:07, Charles Sprickman wrote:
They've been using Thunderbird for some time and I'm finding the
following issues there:
-searches across 2GB+ of mail are painfully slow, since it's all
server-side
TB3 does solve this problem with gloda, which index everything locally.
-while the
On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:35 PM, David Kmoch wrote:
ubik IMAP(foo): : Quota rule: root=User quota mailbox=? bytes=0
messages=0
..
Is it OK, that "bytes=0" is reported?
Yes, because it hasn't yet read maildirsize at that point.
On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Chang Song wrote:
This is something completely new.
We are connecting to our pre-existing custom-made mail server.
IMAP needs to be plugged into the infrastructure.
OK, so you do have some existing mails that need to be accessed.
So basically we can simply use e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for a kick in the right direction ;)
command
echo "1 getquotaroot inbox" | USER=foo dovecot --exec-mail imap
doesn't work as expected
( HOME=/home/foo; USER=foo; echo "1 getquotaroot inbox" | dovecot
- --exec-mail imap )
works much better
On Sep 21, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
On 2009-09-21 14:21, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
-searches across 2GB+ of mail are painfully slow, since it's all
server-side
You could improve this with http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
.
Hello, Timo. Wow. directly from the creator ;-)
Thanks for the reply.
This is something completely new.
We are connecting to our pre-existing custom-made mail server.
IMAP needs to be plugged into the infrastructure.
So basically we can simply use existing index_* since we need to have
index fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Marty Anstey wrote:
Actually I just tried this and it doesn't appear to work:
Fatal: Error in config file /etc/dovecot-noquota.conf: deliver doesn't
support !include directive
I manage multiple copies of conf's using make and
Hello Ammad,
Ammad Shah, 20.09.2009 (d.m.y):
> i have configured Dovecot to save all emails (Sent/recieve) in
> multiple files (MailDir) but still emails are stored in single file
> (POP3 account) also a single file in /var/spool/mail.
What abut your MTA? Is it configured to use Maildir?
Grus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So it's automatically and silently increasing fd limit for some
processes, but not for others. Should it just automatically increase the
limits to all processes when necessary, or never increase and just warn
I was never meant to start a flame, so forgive me if I didn't observe
the list guidelines.
The issue is solved now, it was a simple firewall (anti-malware setting)
issue…
This runs against distro vs distro arguments, version vs version, etc.
Before writing to this list I already Googled, con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009-09-21 14:21, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
>> -searches across 2GB+ of mail are painfully slow, since it's all
>> server-side
>
> You could improve this with http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
27 matches
Mail list logo
