On 2012-06-28 4:22 PM, Alex Crow wrote:
On 28/06/12 20:28, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-06-28 2:04 PM, Gary Mort wrote:
That's probably due to the different structures they use. sdbox
can safely use either because each email message has a unique
filename, and if it exists in both places it
On 28/06/12 20:28, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-06-28 2:04 PM, Gary Mort wrote:
That's probably due to the different structures they use. sdbox
can safely use either because each email message has a unique
filename, and if it exists in both places it doesn't matter.
Eh?? Sdbox is like mbox
On 2012-06-28 2:04 PM, Gary Mort wrote:
That's probably due to the different structures they use. sdbox
can safely use either because each email message has a unique
filename, and if it exists in both places it doesn't matter.
Eh?? Sdbox is like mbox - one file per mailbox/folder... it is NO
On 28.6.2012, at 21.04, Gary Mort wrote:
> mdbox though is different, multiple messages are stored in a single file.
> The index indicates in which file each message is located. When the data
> is moved to alt storage, the filename can change in which case the index is
> updated.
> IE:
> Primary/
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 28.6.2012, at 20.14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> >> "An upshot of the way alternate storage works is that any given storage
> >> file (mailboxes//dbox-Mails/u.* (sdbox) or storage/m.* (mdbox))
> can
> >> only appear *either* in the primary s
On 28.6.2012, at 20.55, Gary Mort wrote:
>> The indexes have to be in primary storage.
>>
> True, but the data they are based on I'm assuming does not include the full
> email message, just a few key pieces:
> uniqueid, subject, from, to, etc.
>
> For an always running server, the indexes are al
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 28.6.2012, at 17.43, Gary Mort wrote:
> > First I want to add AWS S3 as a storage option for alternate storage.
> >
> > Then instead of the above model, the new model would be that email is
> > always stored in alternate storage, and may
On 28.6.2012, at 20.21, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 28.6.2012, at 20.14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>>> "An upshot of the way alternate storage works is that any given storage
>>> file (mailboxes//dbox-Mails/u.* (sdbox) or storage/m.* (mdbox)) can
>>> only appear *either* in the primary storage area *o
On 28.6.2012, at 20.14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> "An upshot of the way alternate storage works is that any given storage
>> file (mailboxes//dbox-Mails/u.* (sdbox) or storage/m.* (mdbox)) can
>> only appear *either* in the primary storage area *or* the alternate storage
>> area but not both — if th
On 28.6.2012, at 17.43, Gary Mort wrote:
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
>
> To make life easy, I'll stick with just single-dbox as a start, however
> multi-dbox would be doable.
>
> With dbox, the only thing that I need to change is the alternate storage
> model:
> "An upshot of t
I did some searching in the mail archives and didn't see any discussion of
integration with AWS, so I wanted to through out my thoughts/plans and see
if it has been done before.
I am setting up my own personal website on EC2 along with an email server,
and I really don't like the idea of using the
11 matches
Mail list logo
