on 8-12-2008 7:26 AM CJ Keist spake the following:
Josef,
This is exactly same situation in our environment as well. I had to
make the same change as you stated. Our central virus/spam email
gateway also cans any message with out a valid from address in the mail
headers. I would think most v
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:26:28AM -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
>I understand the concept of having the from empty, namely to keep
It's not just a concept but a rule set by some RFCs.
> another automated system from replying back to your vacation reply, but
> what do we do to keep our vacation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josef,
This is exactly same situation in our environment as well. I had to
make the same change as you stated. Our central virus/spam email
gateway also cans any message with out a valid from address in the mail
headers. I would think most virus/s
On 8/12/2008, Josef Liaka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in
my opinion undesirable,
It is not only desirable, as Stephan already pointed out to someone
else, it is per the spec:
"This behavior is implemented as such on purpose. F
Josef Liška schreef:
But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in
my opinion undesirable, because many vacation messages are caught in
spam filters.
I think there could be same sender on envelope.
In dovecot-sieve/src/sieve-cmu.c around line 380 is a call to
smtp_clie
Am 12.08.2008 13:32 schrieb Josef Liška:
>
> …
> But it sends vacation messages with null envelope sender, which is in my
> opinion undesirable, because many vacation messages are caught in spam
> filters.
>
> I think there could be same sender on envelope.
> In dovecot-sieve/src/sieve-cmu.c ar