Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 2019-04-19 15:26, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: Unfortunately we have quite long list of things to do, so sometimes even trivial things can take a long time. Not to hijack the thread, but perhaps you could elaborate on what has changed within Dovecot? Timo seems to be put in the backgro

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

Unfortunately we have quite long list of things to do, so sometimes even trivial things can take a long time. Aki On 18 April 2019 16:53 Tanstaafl via dovecot < dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote: Sadly, I guess not...

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

Sadly, I guess not... I'm not sure what to make of this, seeing as both Wietse and Timo said it was almost a trivial thing to fix. On Fri Apr 12 2019 12:17:22 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl via dovecot wrote: > I'm resurrecting this again because I'm getting pretty close to possibly

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

I'm resurrecting this again because I'm getting pretty close to possibly being ready to install a brand new dovecot server (finally), but I still need for dovecots LMTP to add the x-original-to header. So... was this completed quietly, or is support for it still not there? Thanks, Charles On Tu

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 4/28/2015 1:40 PM, Tobias Franzén wrote: > On 2014-01-08 14:32, Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 2012-04-09 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 9.4.2012, at 15.50, Charles Marcus wrote: > LMTP adds a new Delivered-To: header when there is > a single RCPT TO. You can force a single RCPT TO

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 2014-01-08 14:32, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-04-09 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 9.4.2012, at 15.50, Charles Marcus wrote: LMTP adds a new Delivered-To: header when there is a single RCPT TO. You can force a single RCPT TO from Postfix side by setting lmtp_destination_recipient_limit

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(foo): Error: User foo doesn't have home dir set, disabling duplicate database

Hello, some config-trys later: I have to set allow_all_users=yes in the userdb with driver=static: |userdb { args = home=/var/mail/%u uid=Debian-exim gid=Debian-exim|||allow_all_users=yes| driver = static }| Have a good time Christian || Am 31.05.2014 17:04, schrieb Christian Hoffmann:

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(foo): Error: User foo doesn't have home dir set, disabling duplicate database

Am 31.05.2014 19:57, schrieb Christian Hoffmann: Am 31.05.2014 19:50, schrieb Pascal Volk: On 05/31/2014 05:35 PM Christian Hoffmann wrote: Hello Pascal, but I didn't configure a userdb with driver=ldap. There is only one userdb with driver=static and I assumed, that every user gets the same

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(foo): Error: User foo doesn't have home dir set, disabling duplicate database

Am 31.05.2014 19:50, schrieb Pascal Volk: On 05/31/2014 05:35 PM Christian Hoffmann wrote: Hello Pascal, but I didn't configure a userdb with driver=ldap. There is only one userdb with driver=static and I assumed, that every user gets the same uid, gid and a valid home directory. Are there som

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(foo): Error: User foo doesn't have home dir set, disabling duplicate database

On 05/31/2014 05:35 PM Christian Hoffmann wrote: > Hello Pascal, > > but I didn't configure a userdb with driver=ldap. There is only one > userdb with driver=static and I assumed, that every user gets the same > uid, gid and a valid home directory. > > Are there some circumstances, that differe

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(foo): Error: User foo doesn't have home dir set, disabling duplicate database

Hello Pascal, but I didn't configure a userdb with driver=ldap. There is only one userdb with driver=static and I assumed, that every user gets the same uid, gid and a valid home directory. Are there some circumstances, that different passdb-drivers treated in special relation to userdb-driv

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(foo): Error: User foo doesn't have home dir set, disabling duplicate database

On 05/31/2014 03:04 PM Christian Hoffmann wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have a small problem with dovecot installed on ubuntu-13.10. I use > dovcot as LDA with a LDAP-passdb and a pam-passdb. The userdb is static. > A mail to LDAP-user 'foo' is delivered with the error-message > > dovecot: lda

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 2012-04-09 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 9.4.2012, at 15.50, Charles Marcus wrote: LMTP adds a new Delivered-To: header when there is a single RCPT TO. You can force a single RCPT TO from Postfix side by setting lmtp_destination_recipient_limit=1. LMTP doesn't add/remove/change X-Origina

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA

On 23 Aug 2013, at 18:19 , Pascal Volk wrote: > On 08/24/2013 02:12 AM LuKreme wrote: >> OK, I did read but it doesn't answer the >> question I have since it doesn't tell me what I can do with -o, exactly. > > -o is used to override settings, as documented in >

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA

On 08/24/2013 02:12 AM LuKreme wrote: > OK, I did read but it doesn't answer the > question I have since it doesn't tell me what I can do with -o, exactly. -o is used to override settings, as documented in dovecot-lda(1)/http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/DovecotLDA >

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda not logging if dovecot runs under daemontools

Thank you, Jost. The lda output is actually logged on qmail-send's log regards, Roberto Puzzanghera Il 30.07.2013 12:35 Jost Krieger ha scritto: On Fri Jul 26 14:51:30 2013, Roberto Puzzanghera wrote: Hi Jost, thanks for your reply. Il 26.07.2013 13:11 Jost Krieger ha scritto: >Dovecot-l

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda not logging if dovecot runs under daemontools

On Fri Jul 26 14:51:30 2013, Roberto Puzzanghera wrote: > > Hi Jost, thanks for your reply. > > Il 26.07.2013 13:11 Jost Krieger ha scritto: > >Dovecot-lda runs under qmail, so you'll find the output in qmail's > >logs. If you run, say, doveadm manually, the output will be on your > >terminal. >

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda not logging if dovecot runs under daemontools

On Fri Jul 26 12:49:08 2013, Roberto Puzzanghera wrote: > I have dovecot running under daemontools and I can't see dovecot-lda > in action when I read the logs. I've set the logs to /dev/stderr > because daemontools redirects /dev/stderr to > /var/log/dovecot/current. Dovecot-lda runs under qma

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda - dovecot: quota-warning: Error: lda: Fatal: Unknown argument

On 6/24/2013 11:59 AM, Ben Johnson wrote: > Hi, everyone, > > I'm attempting to configure automated quota warnings for users and have > hit a snag. > > The script I'm using is as follows: > > > - > #!/bin/sh > PERCENT=$1 > MA

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA LDAP lookups on samba4 server ends very often in timeouts (Christian Wiese)

Dear Christian thank you very much - you got it at the very first shot: modified /etc/ openldap/ldap.conf adding REFERRALS off en everything works without issues now many thanks Marco Carcano

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA LDAP lookups on samba4 server ends very often in timeouts

Hi Marco, try to check if LDAP REFERRALS are enabled. I had a similar issue some time ago when trying to authenticate against an AD, which didn't worked (long timeouts) as long as I switched off REFERRALS in the systems ldap.conf. (more info you might get by 'man ldap.conf') Cheers, Chris Am W

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA LDAP lookups on samba4 server ends very often in timeouts

just to complete the informations of this thread, here is the log of a mail delivered succesfully (trailing and leading spaces of AT charcater has been added by me) ## MAIL SUCCEFFULLY DELIVERED LOG # Feb 19 17:41:01 sng

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda (2.1.12) segfaults

Timo Sirainen writes: Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:59:54 +0200 Could you send me those files? Would be the easiest and quickest way to get it fixed :) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:02:25 +0200 Okay, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/32ce915e046a Yes it is does, and it stops crashing fo

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda (2.1.12) segfaults

On 19.12.2012, at 12.59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 19.12.2012, at 12.47, Joseph Tam wrote: > >>> Can you still reproduce this in any way? >> >> Yes, I have 6 sets of user INBOX index caches that will crash dovecot-lda. >> The actual content of the INBOX is irrelevant (crash probably happens >>

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda (2.1.12) segfaults

On 19.12.2012, at 12.47, Joseph Tam wrote: >> Can you still reproduce this in any way? > > Yes, I have 6 sets of user INBOX index caches that will crash dovecot-lda. > The actual content of the INBOX is irrelevant (crash probably happens > before INBOX is opened). Could you send me those files?

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda (2.1.12) segfaults

Timo Sirainen writes: Can you still reproduce this in any way? Yes, I have 6 sets of user INBOX index caches that will crash dovecot-lda. The actual content of the INBOX is irrelevant (crash probably happens before INBOX is opened). I found two bugs, would be nice to know if they solve it:

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda (2.1.12) segfaults

On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 03:56 -0800, Joseph Tam wrote: > We uograded our dovecot from version 2.1.10 -> 2.10.12, but within > the first hour of use, dovecot-lda would segfault during delivery. > This left a lock file lying around causing the user's mail readers to > hang; much hilarity ensues. All f

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(root): Fatal: Invalid user settings. Refer to

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:58:55 -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote: Judging from your previous post where deliver tried to write to /root/Maildir/, I suppose your mail will be found in ~thufir/Maildir/new/ . Now Postfix is fine, Dovecot seems to be fine also. Your remaining issue is with "mail". If it's old

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(root): Fatal: Invalid user settings. Refer to

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:32:16PM -0800, Thufir wrote: > On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:09:54 -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote: > >The fix to this is simply not to deliver mail to root. You > >should have aliased root to a mortal user. Postfix will not > >invoke a mailbox_command as root. > > Ah, thank you. Not d

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(root): Fatal: Invalid user settings. Refer to

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:09:54 -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote: The fix to this is simply not to deliver mail to root. You should have aliased root to a mortal user. Postfix will not invoke a mailbox_command as root. In broader terms, you should only use root for actual system administration, and not for

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(root): Fatal: Invalid user settings. Refer to server log for more information.

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:15:24PM +, Ben Morrow wrote: > postfix's local(8) will not allow you to deliver mail as root. Strictly speaking it will deliver to/as root, but not if invoking commands, which is what the OP was doing. -- http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consul

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(root): Fatal: Invalid user settings. Refer to server log for more information.

At 12PM -0800 on 16/11/12 you (Thufir) wrote: > I ran dovecot -a and the blizzard of data seemed ok to my limited > knowledge. Is there another log I should look into to trace this error > down? > > Nov 16 12:30:52 dur dovecot: lda(root): Error: chdir(/root/) failed: > Permission denied (euid

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: lda(root): Fatal: Invalid user settings. Refer to server log for more information.

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:47:52PM -0800, Thufir wrote: > I ran dovecot -a and the blizzard of data seemed ok to my limited > knowledge. Is there another log I should look into to trace this > error down? It's actually a Postfix problem. Postfix is invoking your Dovecot LDA with wrong permission

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda not correct folder

Am 07.11.2012 16:23, schrieb Timo Sirainen: On 30.10.2012, at 7.33, tony.blue.mailingl...@gmx.de wrote: -m optionalfolder, without the dot. Also you may need to set lda_mailbox_autocreate=yes if it doesn't already exist. Thanks Timo, that was the solution of my problem.

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda not correct folder

On 30.10.2012, at 7.33, tony.blue.mailingl...@gmx.de wrote: > ZUSATZORDNER="$DELIVERMAIL -e -d $LOGNAME -m .optionalfolder" > ... > > dovecot-lda puts the mails for the optionalfolder always in the .cur (INBOX). > > What´s the correct dovecot-lda parameter to put the mails in the > optionalfold

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot lda - Permission denied

On 26.10.2012, at 14.44, tony.blue.mailingl...@gmx.de wrote: > Oct 25 23:37:13 gustav dovecot: lda: Error: userdb lookup: > connect(/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb) failed: Permission denied > (euid=501(andy) egid=100(users) missing +w perm: > /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb, dir owned by 0:0 mode=07

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda delivery to Maildir/cur as 'seen'?

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 01:27:00PM +0200, Dale Gallagher wrote: > Hi [..] > The problem now, is that the Sent folder shows the mail as unread, > which MUAs flag (and notify, in the case of some). I've searched the Use Sieve [1] with Imap4flags (RFC 5232) to mark the email as read. Dennis [1]

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA message save logging

Il 22/10/2012 01:08, Dominic Malolepszy ha scritto: Hi, Is there any option in Dovecot that enables logging the full path of where a message is saved in the backend? Dominic With mail_debug=yes you can see it. -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS -> http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ on LinkedIn -> ht

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda setting quota rules

it works great. thank You again Regards, Michal Grzedzicki 2012/8/3, Timo Sirainen : > On 3.8.2012, at 2.13, Lazy wrote: > >>> dovecot-lda -o plugin/quota_rule=*:storage=1G >>> >> >> thank You ! >> >> This is simple and elegant. >> >> Sill I need this to be taken from environment, I produced a s

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda setting quota rules

On 3.8.2012, at 2.13, Lazy wrote: >> dovecot-lda -o plugin/quota_rule=*:storage=1G >> > > thank You ! > > This is simple and elegant. > > Sill I need this to be taken from environment, I produced a simple > patch adding one '-o' from an environment variable. You can also set environment: PLU

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda setting quota rules

2012/7/31 Timo Sirainen : > On 18.7.2012, at 4.33, Lazy wrote: > >> I wan't it to stay that way. The problem is that it dosn't update the >> quota rules in Maildir when quota is changed in userdb. >> I have the rules avaiable in qmail-lda's environment, but I need an >> idea on how to feed the quot

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda setting quota rules

On 18.7.2012, at 4.33, Lazy wrote: > I wan't it to stay that way. The problem is that it dosn't update the > quota rules in Maildir when quota is changed in userdb. > I have the rules avaiable in qmail-lda's environment, but I need an > idea on how to feed the quota rule string to quota plugin wit

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA, Offlineimap and Sieve

Hi Stephan, Stephan Bosch writes: > On 6/22/2012 1:28 AM, Johnny wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to st up Offlineimap to use Dovecots LDA to be able to use >> Sieve for mail filtering, but am not sure how to get this working. I >> think the right way would be to use 'preauthtunnel' in .offlinei

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA, Offlineimap and Sieve

On 6/22/2012 1:28 AM, Johnny wrote: Hi, I am trying to st up Offlineimap to use Dovecots LDA to be able to use Sieve for mail filtering, but am not sure how to get this working. I think the right way would be to use 'preauthtunnel' in .offlineimaprc and try the setup below, which doesn't work.

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA error

to mail group instead of creating new group and adding mail to it???. Hadi- > From: t...@iki.fi > Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:29:51 +0300 > To: almarzuki2...@hotmail.com > CC: dovecot@dovecot.org > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA error > > On 24.4.2012, at 20

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA with sendmail

Timo, in response to Hadi, wrote: Apr 24 20:25:46 lda(ja...@example.com): Fatal: setgid(5000(vmail) from userdb lo okup) failed with euid=8(mail), gid=12(mail), egid=12(mail): Operation not permi tted (This binary should probably be called with process group set to 5000(vmail )

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda error

On 25.4.2012, at 17.52, Hadi Salem wrote: > i tried using multiple uids as mention in wiki2.dovecot.org/LDA bye setting > up setuid-root for dovecot-lda but im getting on-there error from sendmail :- > > Apr 25 17:30:41 host1 sendmail[31024]: q3PEUen2031022: > to=, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA error

On 24.4.2012, at 20.41, Hadi Salem wrote: > Apr 24 20:25:46 lda(ja...@example.com): Fatal: > setgid(5000(vmail) from userdb lo > > okup) failed with > euid=8(mail), gid=12(mail), egid=12(mail): Operation not per

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA with sendmail

i installed new version 2.0.20. but its the same problem args = username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/users ... Apr 21 17:47:16 host1 sendmail[32561]: q3LElF79032559: to=, ctladdr= (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=dovecot, pri=120292, relay=dovecot, dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: dovec

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA with sendmail

: dovecot@dovecot.org > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA with sendmail > > On 2012-04-19 9:45 PM, Joseph Tam wrote: > > Hadi Salem writes: > >> Im configuring sendmail with dovecot for virtual users using > >> password file and file for user name. on centos. > &

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA with sendmail

On 2012-04-19 9:45 PM, Joseph Tam wrote: Hadi Salem writes: Im configuring sendmail with dovecot for virtual users using password file and file for user name. on centos. dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 Maybe I can beat Charles Marcus to the punch and recommend you upgrade to the latest version, otherwi

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA with sendmail

Hadi Salem writes: Im configuring sendmail with dovecot for virtual users using password file and file for user name. on centos. dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 Maybe I can beat Charles Marcus to the punch and recommend you upgrade to the latest version, otherwise you'll run into bugs that have alrea

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 2012-04-09 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: I guess X-Original-To is the same address as what Postfix sees as the original RCPT TO address before alias expansion and such? In that case, see my today's mail in Postfix list. Yep... and hoping that you and Wietse can work out some way to support

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 9.4.2012, at 15.50, Charles Marcus wrote: >> LMTP adds a new Delivered-To: header when there is >> a single RCPT TO. You can force a single RCPT TO from Postfix side by >> setting lmtp_destination_recipient_limit=1. LMTP doesn't >> add/remove/change X-Original-To: header. > > Ok, thanks Timo.

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 2012-04-09 3:33 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 5.4.2012, at 15.59, Charles Marcus wrote: Does anyone know if the use of LMTP (or even the dovecot LDA) still loses the x-original-to header that the postfix vda adds and that I rely heavily on (since I use a lot of aliases), and if it does, is th

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 5.4.2012, at 15.59, Charles Marcus wrote: > Does anyone know if the use of LMTP (or even the dovecot LDA) still loses the > x-original-to header that the postfix vda adds and that I rely heavily on > (since I use a lot of aliases), and if it does, is there any solution to get > the original

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 14:30:38 -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:06:48 -0700 > Daniel L. Miller articulated: > >> Unfortunately, the docs for the ltmp agent http://www.postfix.org/lmtp.8.html [1] don't say anything about adding these headers. I tried asking on the Postfix list - didn

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:06:48 -0700 Daniel L. Miller articulated: > Unfortunately, the docs for the ltmp agent > http://www.postfix.org/lmtp.8.html don't say anything about adding > these headers. I tried asking on the Postfix list - didn't get much > of an answer. I may be wrong; however, from

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 4/6/2012 1:00 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-04-06 2:53 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I'm currently using Postfix 2.7, Dovecot 2.1, and the Dovecot LDA. I have a pure virtual user environment stored in LDAP. My messages include X-Original-To and Delivered-To headers. Well that is great ne

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 2012-04-06 2:53 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I'm currently using Postfix 2.7, Dovecot 2.1, and the Dovecot LDA. I have a pure virtual user environment stored in LDAP. My messages include X-Original-To and Delivered-To headers. Well that is great news... at least I'll be able to use the LDA,

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 4/5/2012 5:59 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-04-05 4:18 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > Also with 2.x you may want to use LMTP rather than the LDA Piping. > > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP I am preparing to convert my main client's postfix_courier-imap setup to dovecot 2.

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA and address extensions - folders flood

On 2012-01-11 2:05 PM, huret deffgok wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-01-11 1:00 PM, huret deffgok wrote: This post is slightly OT, I hope no one will take offense. I was following the wiki on using dovecot LDA with postfix and implemented, for our future ma

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA and address extensions - folders flood

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2012-01-11 1:00 PM, huret deffgok wrote: > >> Hi list, >> >> This post is slightly OT, I hope no one will take offense. >> I was following the wiki on using dovecot LDA with postfix and >> implemented, >> for our future mail server, the

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA and address extensions - folders flood

On 2012-01-11 1:00 PM, huret deffgok wrote: Hi list, This post is slightly OT, I hope no one will take offense. I was following the wiki on using dovecot LDA with postfix and implemented, for our future mail server, the address extensions mechanism: an email sent to "validuser+foldern...@mydoma

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda error

On 05.01.2012 08:45, wrote Wesley M.: Hi, Hi, I use Dovecot 2.0.13 on OpenBSD 5.0 When i try to send emails i have the following error in /var/log/maillog Jan 5 11:23:49 mail50 postfix/pipe[29423]: D951842244C: to=, relay=dovecot, delay=0.02, delays=0.01/0/0/0.01, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounce

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda quota rule

micah anderson writes: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:09:12 -0500, micah anderson wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:27:20 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 13:59 -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: >> > > I really like the feature where you can define quota rules with percents >> > > whi

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda quota rule

On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:09:12 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:27:20 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 13:59 -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > I really like the feature where you can define quota rules with percents > > > which trigger off of the default v

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda quota rule

On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:27:20 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 11:09 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > > > protocol lda { > > > plugin { > > > quota_rule2 = INBOX:storage=200% > > > } > > > } > > > > Aha! Just what I was looking for. I presume the number following > > 'quot

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda quota rule

On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 11:09 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > > protocol lda { > > plugin { > > quota_rule2 = INBOX:storage=200% > > } > > } > > Aha! Just what I was looking for. I presume the number following > 'quota_rule' must be an unique number across all quota_rules in my > config? No

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda quota rule

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:27:20 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 13:59 -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > I really like the feature where you can define quota rules with percents > > which trigger off of the default values[0] (so you can set the Trash to > > allow for 10% more of the

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda quota rule

On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 13:59 -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > I really like the feature where you can define quota rules with percents > which trigger off of the default values[0] (so you can set the Trash to > allow for 10% more of the user's quota for example). > > What I would really love in dove

Re: [Dovecot] DoveCot LDA prefetch fails with LDA, works with POP client

> -Original Message- > From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] > On Behalf Of Zhou, Yan > Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 4:24 PM > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Subject: [Dovecot] DoveCot LDA prefetch fails with LDA, works with POP > client > > Hi there, > > I a

Re: [Dovecot] DoveCot LDA/Postfix deliver by address

On 21/06/11 19:34, Zhou, Yan wrote: > Hi there, > > I am using DoveCot 1.0.7 and virtual users. We want to integrate with > Postfix 2.3.3 to use DoveCot LDA to deliver messages to user mailbox. > All users are stored in LDAP. DoveCot looks up user by LDAP access. > > Our user name is not necessa

Re: [Dovecot] DoveCot LDA/Postfix deliver by address

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:53:31 -0400 Charles Marcus articulated: > On 2011-06-21 1:34 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote: > > I am using DoveCot 1.0.7 > > > > > Any suggestions? > > Upgrade first... Both Dovecot and Postfix. Postfix <=2.4 are no longer supported. -- Jerry ✌ dovecot.u...@seibercom.net Discl

Re: [Dovecot] DoveCot LDA/Postfix deliver by address

On 2011-06-21 1:34 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote: > I am using DoveCot 1.0.7 > Any suggestions? Upgrade first... -- Best regards, Charles

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda 2.0.8 Panic: stream doesn't support seeking backwards

On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:45 +, Riadh Djebrouni wrote: > Hi, I'm facing the exact same problem. > Did you find a workaround? This was fixed in a newer Dovecot version.

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda 2.0.8 Panic: stream doesn't support seeking backwards

Le jeudi 5 mai 2011 20:45, Riadh Djebrouni a écrit : > Hi, I'm facing the exact same problem. > Did you find a workaround? è un ragazzino di breve -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 pgpxHBiEevhdt.pgp Description: P

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda 2.0.8 Panic: stream doesn't support seeking backwards

Hi, I'm facing the exact same problem. Did you find a workaround?

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot lda aliases doesn't work

Hi Selçuk, You need to set alias delivery at Qmail level, I did a similar setup with Dovecot & Postfix, and virtual domains and aliases, I found the easier solution was to define Virtual Alias Maps for Postfix so it would ask dovecot deliver to the correct mailbox user. YMMV... Kerem On Mon, Ap

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda can not find home dir

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 29.3.2011, at 19.32, Pete wrote: > >> Mar 29 11:26:15 new-eagle dovecot: lda(pete): Debug: userdb lookup >> skipped, username taken from passwd lookup for process euid > > Hmm. Although that should also set home directory even without -d

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda can not find home dir

On 29.3.2011, at 19.32, Pete wrote: > Mar 29 11:26:15 new-eagle dovecot: lda(pete): Debug: userdb lookup > skipped, username taken from passwd lookup for process euid Hmm. Although that should also set home directory even without -d parameter, since it looks it up from passwd.. Wonder why that's

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda can not find home dir

On 29.3.2011, at 19.32, Pete wrote: > Dovecot seems to be able to determine the user's home directory, but I > do not know how to tell dovecot-lda where it is. .. > In /home/pete, the .forward file is: > | "/usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda" You're not giving dovecot-lda the "-d user" parameter, s

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA: "temporary failure"

Forget it. I must have been crosseyed. Someone had put the log file in a non-standard place /home/vmail/dovecot-deliver.log. It told all. A plugin cmusieve was not found, possibly depreciated? I learned how to make the deliver command line work. ;) Sorry, David Koski dko...@sutinen.com > A

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA: "temporary failure"

Forget it. I must have been crosseyed. Someone had put the log file in a non-standard place /home/vmail/dovecot-deliver.log. It told all. A plugin cmusieve was not found, possibly depreciated? I learned how to make the deliver command line work. ;) Sorry, David Koski dko...@sutinen.com > A

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA: "temporary failure"

Additional information: I created a script to get the return code from deliver: 1 #!/bin/bash 2 3 cat "cur/1300037582.P7332Q0M221160.brusco-mail:2,S" | /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -f dko...@somedomain.com -d dko...@domainhidden.com 4 5 case $? in 6 0) echo "0" 7 ;; 8 64)

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA and Postfix/local for local users.

mailbox_command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver (path to deliver) After that should I commented postfix/local process from master cf ? no. How else is postfix going to deliver to _local_ users? When uncommented I can see in logs that although deliver is using - local is used somewhere.

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA and Postfix/local for local users.

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/09/2011 10:07 AM, i...@promax.media.pl wrote: >> Hello, >> I would like to configure dovecot lda for local users. My dovecot >> vesion >> is 1.2.15. Dovecot documentation for System users says that only thing >> I >> should add to main.c

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA and Postfix/local for local users.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/09/2011 10:07 AM, i...@promax.media.pl wrote: > Hello, > I would like to configure dovecot lda for local users. My dovecot vesion > is 1.2.15. Dovecot documentation for System users says that only thing I > should add to main.cf is: > > mailbo

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot lda and quota plugin with mysql

On 01/17/2011 11:53 AM, J4 wrote: > On 01/16/2011 08:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:22 +0100, J4 wrote: >> >>> I have postfix delivering to dovecot lda (via spamassinassin). I >>> have configured the quota plugin, but it does not seem to respect the >>> details in the

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot lda and quota plugin with mysql

On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:22 +0100, J4 wrote: > I have postfix delivering to dovecot lda (via spamassinassin). I > have configured the quota plugin, but it does not seem to respect the > details in the quota table in mysql. The query I have used looks > correct to me, and the user can connect

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda 2.0.8 Panic: stream doesn't support seeking backwards

On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 12:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 8.12.2010, at 3.43, Jacky Chan wrote: Everything work fine and mail can be saved to user's home directory without error when the user is not over quota. If over quota occur, the maillog log this error message: Panic: stream d

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda 2.0.8 Panic: stream doesn't support seeking backwards

On 8.12.2010, at 3.43, Jacky Chan wrote: > Everything work fine and mail can be saved to user's home directory without > error when the user is not over quota. > If over quota occur, the maillog log this error message: > > Panic: stream doesn't support seeking backwards lda(x...@xxx.com): Hmm.

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda segfault

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 12:36 +0100, Micha Krause wrote: > dovecot-lda crashes with a segfault, if I run it as a user who has no > mailbox, and no permission to create one. Could you get gdb backtrace? Something like: gdb --args dovecot-lda run bt full If that doesn't work, send your doveconf -

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda crash

check if that fix the issue http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/e2f9baa436f2 2010/10/18 Luca Palazzo : > Hi Timo and All, > we had to revert back to LDA delivery instead of lmtp proxy (too buggy). > We nare now experiencing process segfaults: > > [503564.305998] dovecot-lda[2415]: segfault at 4

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda segfaults (debug)

Yes, this patch fixed that problem. Thank you! >> # 1.2.14: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf > .. >> #0 0x00483340 in message_parser_parse_next_block () >> No symbol table info available. >> #1 0x00444fe4 in index_mail_cache_parse_continue () >> No symbol table info available. >> #2

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda segfaults (debug)

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:05 +0300, Michael M Galapchuk wrote: > # 1.2.14: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf .. > #0 0x00483340 in message_parser_parse_next_block () > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x00444fe4 in index_mail_cache_parse_continue () > No symbol table info available.

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda segfaults

Il giorno 07/ott/2010, alle ore 09.06, Andre ha scritto: > Hi to all. > Since version 2.0.3 (now I am running 2.0.5) I have experienced segfaults on > mail delivery, either with dovecot-lda and lmtp. > > At least I succeded in having a core dump, here is the backtrace: > > #0 0x7f1cca3501

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda segfaults

Andre schreef: Hi to all. Since version 2.0.3 (now I am running 2.0.5) I have experienced segfaults on mail delivery, either with dovecot-lda and lmtp. At least I succeded in having a core dump, here is the backtrace: #0 0x7f1cca350160 in maildir_sync_set_new_msgs_count () from /usr/lib

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda segfaults with some sieve scripts

Hello Stephan, This fix works. Thank you for that. Cheers, Olivier On 29/09/2010 18:11, Stephan Bosch wrote: > >> Hello again, >> >> I've added the -d and -f flags to the command line and this time I got a >> trace. >> >> (gdb) r >> Starting program: /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -p >> exa

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda segfaults with some sieve scripts

Hello again, I've added the -d and -f flags to the command line and this time I got a trace. (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -p example-message.eml -f u...@domain.com -d u...@domain.com (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbo

  1   2   >