[..]
Well, I've read the dsync documentation, but this warning has me a
little worried:
"Make sure destination is exactly as source, deleting/reverting any
changes in destination if necessary"
This is when you use the 'backup' option. Dsync then makes 1:1 copy of
the source. If you use 'sync
> On 13 Dec 2017, at 18.27, Davide Marchi wrote:
>
> Sami Ketola wrote:> We run all our migrations using Dovecot internal dsync.
> Usually using imapc connector to connect to legacy
>> platform.
>> Wqmi
>
> Many thanks Wqmi!
> Well, I've read the dsync documentation, but this warning has me a
Sami Ketola wrote:> We run all our migrations using Dovecot internal
dsync. Usually using imapc connector to connect to legacy
platform.
Wqmi
Many thanks Wqmi!
Well, I've read the dsync documentation, but this warning has me a
little worried:
"Make sure destination is exactly as source, del
On Mon, December 11, 2017 9:32 am, Davide Marchi wrote:
>
> However, it seems that Imapsync has license issues and in fact it's not
> included in the Debian repositories.
> Is it to be used anyway or should be avoid?
>
I do not believe imapsync has license issues. Its written in perl and its
hos
> On 11 Dec 2017, at 12.32, Davide Marchi wrote:
>
> Il 2017-12-05 07:16 Sami Ketola ha scritto:
> [..]
>> Trust us. We have run multiple migrations at scale of 10+ million users.
>> Sami
>
> However, it seems that Imapsync has license issues and in fact it's not
> included in the Debian repos
Il 2017-12-05 07:16 Sami Ketola ha scritto:
[..]
Trust us. We have run multiple migrations at scale of 10+ million
users.
Sami
However, it seems that Imapsync has license issues and in fact it's not
included in the Debian repositories.
Is it to be used anyway or should be avoid?
Many tha
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Sami Ketola wrote:
>
> Can't really do DNS change to test with one user as DNS change affects all
> users.
Yes, of course. For test purposes one could justchange the system's host
file and simulate a DNS change, after imapsync is complete
I meant a simple test ju
We migrated 36 TB of mail (65K users) from Sun Messaging to Dovecot
using Imapsync, worked like a charm.
Regards
María
On 04/12/17 23:15, Steve Litt wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Joseph Tam wrote:
"Davide Marchi" writes:
UW-IMAP's mailutil, imapsync, YippieMove and Larch.
Whatever you use, *don't* use UW-IMAP's mailutil unless you got lots
of time to kill. It is dreadfully slow -- I used
> On 5 Dec 2017, at 12.46, Webert de Souza Lima wrote:
>
> Sorry, I might be wrong about cache invalidation, indeed. What I'm sure is
> that users will hardly notice any server change.
> We've never had user complaints about mailboxes resyncing or anything like
> that after imapsync'ing to a new
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Sami Ketola wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sami Ketola
> wrote:
>
>>
>> With every other tool you will face end users needing to invalidate
>> their local caches and
>> redownloading all headers if not also all mail bodies.
>>
>> Sami
>>
>> > On 4 Dec
> On 5 Dec 2017, at 10.20, Paolo wrote:
>
> Il 04/12/2017 17:37, Michael Slusarz ha scritto:
>>> I think Davide was asking about dsync. If so, the answer is no: dsync
>>> works only when both servers are Dovecot and needs some additional
>>> configuration to work through the network (see
>>> htt
Il 04/12/2017 17:37, Michael Slusarz ha scritto:
I think Davide was asking about dsync. If so, the answer is no: dsync
works only when both servers are Dovecot and needs some additional
configuration to work through the network (see
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication).
This is entirely incorr
> On 4 Dec 2017, at 19.59, Webert de Souza Lima wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sami Ketola wrote:
>
>>
>> With every other tool you will face end users needing to invalidate their
>> local caches and
>> redownloading all headers if not also all mail bodies.
>>
>> Sami
>>
>>
>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Joseph Tam wrote:
> "Davide Marchi" writes:
>
> >> UW-IMAP's mailutil, imapsync, YippieMove and Larch.
>
> Whatever you use, *don't* use UW-IMAP's mailutil unless you got lots
> of time to kill. It is dreadfully slow -- I used it to export some of
> m
"Davide Marchi" writes:
UW-IMAP's mailutil, imapsync, YippieMove and Larch.
Whatever you use, *don't* use UW-IMAP's mailutil unless you got lots
of time to kill. It is dreadfully slow -- I used it to export some of
my users' mailboxes to Gmail or other remote mail servers, and I could
almost
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sami Ketola wrote:
>
> With every other tool you will face end users needing to invalidate their
> local caches and
> redownloading all headers if not also all mail bodies.
>
> Sami
>
>
I don't think so. Been using imapsync for large scale migrations from
external
> On December 4, 2017 at 8:46 AM Paolo wrote:
>
>
> Il 04/12/2017 14:33, x9p ha scritto:
> >
> >> Can I use this tool even if I do not know the other remote server
> >> typology?
> >>
> > sure. just need both IMAP ports reachable and valid user/pass for both
> > servers.
> I think Davide was ask
Il 04/12/2017 14:33, x9p ha scritto:
Can I use this tool even if I do not know the other remote server
typology?
sure. just need both IMAP ports reachable and valid user/pass for both
servers.
I think Davide was asking about dsync. If so, the answer is no: dsync
works only when both servers
>> Hi,
>>
>> I vouch for imapsync. Have used it in the past with quite a big amount
>> of
>> emails.
>>
>> cheers.
>>
>> x0p
>
> Ah, thanks x0!
>
welcome!
>
> Can I use this tool even if I do not know the other remote server
> typology?
>
sure. just need both IMAP ports reachable and valid user
[..]
Hi,
I vouch for imapsync. Have used it in the past with quite a big amount
of
emails.
cheers.
x0p
Ah, thanks x0!
Also if you have fs access on both servers, and you are using maildir,
plain rsync works just as well.
Aki
no, I've not fs access on both servers! :-/
If you want to
> On 3 Dec 2017, at 23.23, Davide Marchi wrote:
>
> Hi Friends,
> I would like to ask you a suggestion:
> I need to migrate a imap server to a new one and then dismiss the old one.
> Reading from relative Dovecot documentation page
> (https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration), more tools are shown:
>
Also if you have fs access on both servers, and you are using maildir,
plain rsync works just as well.
Aki
On 04.12.2017 00:17, Harondel J. Sibble wrote:
> Imapsync for sure. Have used it for both IMAP to IMAP and IMAP to Exchange
> migrations. Works great.
>
>
>> On Dec 3, 2017, at 2:08 PM, x9
Imapsync for sure. Have used it for both IMAP to IMAP and IMAP to Exchange
migrations. Works great.
> On Dec 3, 2017, at 2:08 PM, x9p wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I vouch for imapsync. Have used it in the past with quite a big amount of
> emails.
>
> cheers.
>
> x0p
>
>> Hi Friends,
>> I would like
Hi,
I vouch for imapsync. Have used it in the past with quite a big amount of
emails.
cheers.
x0p
> Hi Friends,
> I would like to ask you a suggestion:
> I need to migrate a imap server to a new one and then dismiss the old
> one.
> Reading from relative Dovecot documentation page
> (https://wi
Hi Friends,
I would like to ask you a suggestion:
I need to migrate a imap server to a new one and then dismiss the old
one.
Reading from relative Dovecot documentation page
(https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration), more tools are shown:
UW-IMAP's mailutil, imapsync, YippieMove and Larch.
The eac
26 matches
Mail list logo