http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-26 01:17 ---
removing the lines mentioned in #16 works fine :)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-24 10:39 ---
Oops, might be one of the other tlb related changes as well. See the
changesets for via-agp.c at
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/src/drivers/char/agp?nav=index.html
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-24 10:36 ---
How about reverting this bit from via-agp.c? Dave said that some other via
users' problems were fixed that way.
--- a/drivers/char/agp/via-agp.c2005-03-24 10:33:
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-24 05:51 ---
"fix a bug in setversion ioctl with XFree86 4.3" does not fix the bug I have
(applied on 2.6.12-rc1)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assig
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-23 22:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=4792)
--> (http://bugme.osdl.org/attachment.cgi?id=4792&action=view)
fix a bug in setversion ioctl with XFree86 4.3
--- You are receiving thi
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-23 22:31 ---
could you try the patch I'm going to attach? I'm not sure it'll fix this issue
but I've just started running sarge myself on my radeon and it turned up...
--- You are re
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 05:57 ---
It does not work as well. The (error-)messages stay the same and the screen is
only black with the cursor...
_I_ dont know how I can help... but you can tell me what to do.
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 17:56 ---
I'm assuming that we still have a bug here, although it's not obvious what it
is.
Markus, it might be useful to test 2.6.12-rc1-mm1, which has an AGP/DRI fix.
Although we'
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Video(DRI) |Video(AGP)
Kernel Version|from at least 2
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-18 02:51 ---
disabling agp-support in the kernel works fine:
[drm] Initialized drm 1.0.0 20040925
[drm] Initialized r128 2.5.0 20030725 on minor 0: ATI Technologies Inc Rage
128RF/SG A
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-17 10:08 ---
Oh right, I think DRM requires AGP if you have it enabled when you build it.
You can try building your kernel w/o AGP support to see if that helps. If
disabling AGP doesn
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-17 09:25 ---
Unfortunately it doesnt help anything...
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-17 08:40 ---
It belongs in the Device section corresponding to your card driver. E.g.
Section "Device"
Identifier "Generic Video Card"
Driver "r128"
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-17 05:29 ---
.3-bk2 and your patch applied (btw the whole screen is now black):
Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones
agpgart: Detected VIA Apollo Pro 133 chipset
agpgart: M
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 12:14 ---
Nevermind, after looking at the log you already pasted, I don't think my patch
will give us any additional info. It looks like AGP at least thinks it
initialized properly,
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 11:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=4733)
--> (http://bugme.osdl.org/attachment.cgi?id=4733&action=view)
debug output for agp backend
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 11:55 ---
For some reason the informational printks were deleted. Can you try the
attached patch and see what it prints in your syslog?
Jesse
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 08:18 ---
-bk2 works fine, bk6 (and the current .3-bk1) have the same problem (or a
similar^^) the screen is black in the upper part (to be exact 1/4, not 1/3)
and the system is very
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-15 02:26 ---
Can you do some testing of -bk2, -bk6 as well?
-bk2 should be fine, if -bk6 is broken then it is the multi-bridge AGP stuff
that is broken, and if -bk6 works but -bk8 doesn'
20 matches
Mail list logo