Dennis Roberts wrote:
1. you could take several methods AT random (after you list out all 50) ...
This is the classical position, I think. However, in practice we
never require random sampling in order to treat people as random.
Clark argues ISTR that we should treat factors as random if
have a random
factor we can have interaction without main effects. is right that?
k) And generally i read everywhere random versus fixed factor issue
but nowhere refer what is that (disadv, adv.. implications...),
neither i found something understadable in internet or in our
bibliothic.
l) so i ask
gee just a short question to answer!
here is one part of it
say you were interested in whether different teaching methods impacted on
how well students learned intro statistics ...
now, if we put our minds to it, there probably are 50 or more different
ways we could teach a course like
Elias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i am a little confused about this topic
(i am a student in psychology), i can not understand the below
(please be patient i am new to this)
If you read Geoffrey Keppel _Design Analysis. A Researcher's
Handbook_, (the 2nd ed is ISBN 0-13-200048-2) this may
