With this set up:
Server1Server2
Primary Shard 1 Primary Shard 2
Replica Shard 1 Replica Shard 2
1) If primary shard 1 failed, would replica shard 1 take over and become
primary shard 1?
2) Is reading
Which cluster would give better read performance on two separate servers?
ES cluster Foo
[] serverA - 1 primary shard
[] serverB - 2 replica Shards
ES cluster Bar
[] serverA - 1 primary shard and 1 replica shard
[] serverB - 1 primary shard and 1 replica shard
--
You received this message
Oh, I see what you mean...sorry about that. Thanks!
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 10:17:38 AM UTC-6, Darin Hensley wrote:
Which cluster would give better read performance on two separate servers?
ES cluster Foo
[] serverA - 1 primary shard
[] serverB - 2 replica Shards
ES cluster Bar
and no primaries is not
important.
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 10:17:38 AM UTC-6, Darin Hensley wrote:
Which cluster would give better read performance on two separate servers?
ES cluster Foo
[] serverA - 1 primary shard
[] serverB - 2 replica Shards
ES cluster Bar
[] serverA - 1 primary shard