I didn't name this proposal:
1. Determine defeats a la Symmetrical ICT
2. Discard defeats that are in cycles
3. If exactly one candidate is unbeaten, s/he wins
4. If all or no candidates are unbeaten, elect the most top-ranked
5. If some, but not all, candidates are unbeaten, elect the most
to
On 16 Nov 2012 07:29:52 -0800, Chris Benham wrote:
>
>
>It isn't a big deal if Ranked Pairs or River are used instead of
>Schulze. "Losing Votes" means that the pairwise results are weighed
>purely by the number of votes on the losing side. The "weakest
>defeats" are those with the most votes
