IRV's got a first mover advantage over SODA and to catch up you need to
convince someone like Soros to help you market it. It wouldn't matter if
you got the whole EM list to agree with you that it was hunky-dory.
But in the context of a 2-party dominated system, there aren't as many
serious candi
If first-mover is all that counts, then I'm afraid we're stuck with
plurality. Obviously, I hope and believe that's not true.
Jameson
2012/2/17 David L Wetzell
> IRV's got a first mover advantage over SODA and to catch up you need to
> convince someone like Soros to help you market it. It woul
It is because first-mover counts a lot that we've been stuck with FPTP in
the US for such a long time in contrast with countries with younger
democracies...
I never said it was all that counts, but it counts a good deal, as I
metaphorically allude to by emphing the diffs in Ps over the diffs in Xs
Hi David,
De : David L Wetzell
>>À : election-methods@lists.electorama.com
>>Envoyé le : Vendredi 17 février 2012 13h37
>>Objet : Re: [EM] JQ wrt SODA
>>
>>
>IRV's got a first mover advantage over SODA and to catch up you need to
>convince some
