[Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-18 Thread Leo
2009/9/16 Mark A. Hershberger : > Leo writes: > >>> Hrm… That should actually be taken care of in the new xml-rpc.el (see >>> the end of the file, where timezone-parse-date is conditionally >>> defined. Or it should be. >> >> I see. I guess, for some reason, that didn't happen and the original >>

[Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-16 Thread Mark A. Hershberger
Leo writes: >> Hrm… That should actually be taken care of in the new xml-rpc.el (see >> the end of the file, where timezone-parse-date is conditionally >> defined. Or it should be. > > I see. I guess, for some reason, that didn't happen and the original > timezone-parse-date from timezone.el was

[Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-15 Thread Leo
On 2009-09-15 03:51 +0100, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > Leo writes: > >> Thank you for this info. I realised it could be the fault of other libs >> used by xml-rpc and indeed the latest timezone.el is required for >> lisppaste to work, i.e., must have the change on Fri Aug 14 18:18:41 2009 >> UTC:

[Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-15 Thread Leo
On 2009-09-13 07:57 +0100, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > Thank you all for your great bug reports. I installed a MT weblog as > If you were experiencing problems in the past, please get the following > versions and notify me of any new problems: > > xml-rpc.el - 1.6.6 - http://www.emacswiki.o

Re: [Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-14 Thread Mark A. Hershberger
Leo writes: > Thank you for this info. I realised it could be the fault of other libs > used by xml-rpc and indeed the latest timezone.el is required for > lisppaste to work, i.e., must have the change on Fri Aug 14 18:18:41 2009 > UTC: add ability to understand ISO8601 basic format as well as th

[Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-14 Thread Leo
On 2009-09-14 16:41 +0100, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > I can't reproduce this at all. I've tried “emacs -q -no-site-file” > with Emacs22 and Emacs23.1.50.1 (CVS). > > Here is a short test script that you can run from the command line to > verify the problem: [...] Thank you for this info. I real

Re: [Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-14 Thread Mark A. Hershberger
Leo writes: > I tried lisppaste.el from today emacswiki and the bug persists. This was > tested with Emacs -q. I can't reproduce this at all. I've tried “emacs -q -no-site-file” with Emacs22 and Emacs23.1.50.1 (CVS). Here is a short test script that you can run from the command line to verify

[Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-14 Thread Leo
On 2009-09-14 03:03 +0100, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > Leo, > > It looks like I've lost the admin password for mailman, so I couldn't > approve your email to the list. Once I have the password changed, I'll > authorize your email address to post to the list. Your original email > is below. Than

[Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-13 Thread Mark A. Hershberger
Leo, It looks like I've lost the admin password for mailman, so I couldn't approve your email to the list. Once I have the password changed, I'll authorize your email address to post to the list. Your original email is below. The following patch fixes lisppaste to work with the new xml-rpc.el.