Hello,
Background: I'm trying to build a punch press with a "head clear"
sensor. Whenever the "tip" of the press passes a certain height, a
sensor is triggered and the metal sheet should be moved to the position
of the next punch (before the tip reaches the bottom of the movement -
the punchin
--- if ( ( tmp1 * pid->limit_state ) <= 0.0 ) {
+++ if ( ( tmp1 * pid->limit_state * pid->igain ) <= 0.0 ) {
Is a possible patch if negative PID values are to be allowed
Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics
--
The ultimate
Hello,
I guess I answered my own question with a little more digging:
> Internally, the task cycle is controlled by an RCS_TIMER. Waiting
> (AFAIK) is done by the followin line in libnml/os_intf/_timer.c
> (function esleep()):
>
> ...
> if (select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL,&tval)< 0) {
> ...
Indeed,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:36:49PM -0200, Matheus Degiovani wrote:
>
> So, the question is: can esleep() be modified to use a high resolution
> timer (nanosleep() or similar) or maybe the RCS_TIMER class use this
> other method of sleeping (since apparentely it's used only for timing
> the main
About a month ago, I made some substantial updates to the ppmc driver
section of the Integrator's Manual
(file: docs/src/drivers/pico_ppmc.lyx) but these changes have not showed
up yet in the main version of the manual
linked from the Wiki page. Is there something I need to do to push
these cha
