Experts,
I am considering industrial machinery that might include as components all
manner of devices (fluorescent lights, control computers, monitors, PWM motor
drives, various sensors) and what radiated emission limits might be in either
the CE or FCC realm.
In the case that ISM devices (suc
UL/CSA60950-1 has very specific material requirements for motors. And 508C
being deprecated, we now have UL61800-5-1, so that might be helpful if this is
a controlled-drive motor, but have not read so not certain. IEC60204 has broad
scope, so there an 'equivalent' ANSI or CSA standard not availa
I'm trying a preemptive attack on the design to make sure it complies before we
get questioned by any AHJ or NRTL. Perhaps I should clarify the my original
question is relevant to wiring internal to machinery hence the reference to
NFPA 79. I'll take a look at NFPA 70 in a bit. Next on my lis
Have an aphorism for this that was derived from another common one (Shaw), that
found its way into a product's installation instructions:
Do not argue with an AHJ, you will get dirty and the AHJ probably likes the
dirt.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.dem
In message
.com>, dated Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Brian Oconnell
writes:
Article 430 should be referenced for this stuff. In general, overload
protection required for each branch circuit at the distribution panel.
Less bother doing it that way, than arguing with the AHJ.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only.
If you are trying to do an A-B comparison between two filters or simply
characterize at different impedances, it is possible to use a 10:1 BALUN in
line with your spectrum analyzer and tracking generator setup to intentionally
introduce a mismatch in impedance. I recommend doing three measurem
Article 430 should be referenced for this stuff. In general, overload
protection required for each branch circuit at the distribution panel.
My experience with current interrupt stuff embedded within motor is typically
to meet the EIS ratings (limits of windings), and unless it is thermomagneti
In message
<64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB026D936A@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local>,
dated Wed, 15 Apr 2015, "Kunde, Brian" writes:
You may just want to characterize the line filter yourself. Then you
will know. You will need a receiver or spectrum analyzer with a
tracking generator, a network
You may just want to characterize the line filter yourself. Then you will know.
You will need a receiver or spectrum analyzer with a tracking generator, a
network analyzer, or a sig gen and power meter combination. Our lab uses a
simple labview program for characterizing amps, filters, cables, a
I was just curious because Schurter have diagrams up to 400MHz on their
filters, and since I have a RF field immunity issue at 100-150MHz (induced
noise on AC cable disturb PSU), I'm looking for some potential net filters.
#Amund
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa
In message <00c701d0774a$2d0b60b0$8710$@westin-emission.no>, dated
Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Amund Westin writes:
What kind of filter attenuation can be expected in the frequency region
100-150MHz?
You have to ask the manufacturers.
Can only find filter diagrams up to 30-40MHz.
That's partly
What kind of filter attenuation can be expected in the frequency region
100-150MHz?
Can only find filter diagrams up to 30-40MHz.
B.regards
Amund
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussio
12 matches
Mail list logo