Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Conformity and SI List I attended an electronic conference where a well-known EMI/EMC speaker/author stated that the 20 H rule is useless for suppression of radiated emissions. On the other hand, another well known EMI/EMC speaker/author states

Re: Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Isn't it fun, that's why I am not sure if being called an EMC expert is a good thing. Now to the point: 1) Pulling back the Vcc plane away from the edge of the "ground" plane changes the distribution of the EM field at the edge. While the strengt

Re: Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking

Cortland, The Ansoft URL's pdf comes up nil. Going to the \thewave\ index doesn't list that .pdf Would you send me a copy? - Robert - On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:47:48 -0500 Cortland Richmond <72146@compuserve.com> wrote: > Ken Javor wrote > > >> I didn't know what the 20 H rule

Re: Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking

Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:47:48 -0500 > To: ieee pstc list > Subject: Re: Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking > > Ken Javor wrote > >>> I didn't know what the 20 H rule was either, just assumed everyone else > did... << > > See &g

Re: Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking

Ken Javor wrote >> I didn't know what the 20 H rule was either, just assumed everyone else did... << See http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list4/0391.html page 9 of http://www.ansoft.com/thewave/Shielding_and_Decoupling.pdf http://factaee.elfak.ni.ac.yu/fu2k12/fu04.html and others (search on "20H rule

Re: Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking

I didn't know what the 20 H rule was either, just assumed everyone else did... > From: John Woodgate > Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:49:13 + > To: emc-p...@ieee.org > Subject: Re: Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking > > americo...@aol.com wrot

Re: Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking

americo...@aol.com wrote (in <26c.a77014.30bb4...@aol.com>) about 'Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking', on Sun, 27 Nov 2005: >Conformity and SI List >I attended an electronic conference where a well-known EMI/EMC >speaker/author stated that

Re: Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking

bject: Suppression of radiated emissions and spread spectrum clocking Conformity and SI List I attended an electronic conference where a well-known EMI/EMC speaker/author stated that the 20 H rule is useless for suppression of radiated emissions. On the other hand, another well known EM