Additional to the categories it would be great to (de)activate all modules
in a category with "one" click.
So the category should get the same checkboxes like the modules have right
now.
Maybe a advanced dialog could be useful to separate user-modules (tclock,
cpu, ...) from system-modules (borders
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 10:39:28 +0200 Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> I also suggest to have module categories, as we already use the
> module.desktop files for the icons, we should use it for the categories.
> This way we wouldn't have a long list, we instead have the modules
Ok. Feeling a bit stupid... But, I'm convinced. After all, i just wanted a
few arguments. :-)
2007/7/8, Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I also suggest to have module categories, as we already use the
> module.desktop files for the icons, we should use it for the categories.
> Th
I also suggest to have module categories, as we already use the
module.desktop files for the icons, we should use it for the categories.
This way we wouldn't have a long list, we instead have the modules more
organised in category lists.
It would be also cool to have the description directly in the
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 20:11:09 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not
> > only me, of course)... At least explain us :-)
>
> I still have to
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 19:57:51 -0500 Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 01:40:37AM +0300, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> > On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its
> > > not only m
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 01:40:37 +0300 "Hisham Mardam Bey"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not
> > only me, of course)... At least explain us :-)
> >
>
> This is actually no
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 20:04:43 +0300 "Luchezar Petkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
explain why you don't like it?
> Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not
> only me, of course)... At least explain us :-)
>
> --
> Luchezar P. Petkov
> http://luchko.wordpress.co
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 01:40:37AM +0300, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not
> > only me, of course)... At least explain us :-)
> >
>
> This is actually not a very bad idea
On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not
> only me, of course)... At least explain us :-)
I still have to talk to raster about this, but I think it's due we
pushing E for embedded devices. At least I want to
On 7/7/07, Luchezar Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not
> only me, of course)... At least explain us :-)
>
This is actually not a very bad idea, its actually a good move towards
refactoring a lot of E's code and making it
Raster, why the heck are you doing this? I don't like the idea (and its not
only me, of course)... At least explain us :-)
--
Luchezar P. Petkov
http://luchko.wordpress.com
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Down
12 matches
Mail list logo
