On 26 February 2010 16:41, Rex Allen wrote:
>> We could, for example, have the belief that we only survive for a day,
>> and the entity who wakes up in our bed tomorrow is a different person.
>> We would then use up our resources and plan for the future as if we
>> only had hours to live. But peo
Hi Marty,
On 25 Feb 2010, at 15:03, m.a. wrote:
Bruno:
Does the following relate at all to your theory of Comp?
I am not so sure, or I don't see how. I don't address the question of
individual life. What I show is true for all machines (enough rich
(Löbian) and ideally correct, a
On 23 Feb 2010, at 15:38, Diego Caleiro wrote:
I'm not reading the whole discussion here, but the reason I
recommended those readings is that I sensed a mix between accounting
for phenomenal consciousness and access conciousness in the
discussion.Both were used as 1p and 3p, depending
Bruno,
Thanks for this deeply profound reply.
marty a.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruno Marchal"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: On the computability of consciousn
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Charles wrote:
> On Feb 23, 9:02 am, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> > But recent analysis produced by neuroimaging technologies has revealed
> something quite remarkable: a great deal of meaningful activity is occurring
> in the brain when a person is sitting back and do
> From: stath...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:23:55 +1100
> Subject: Re: problem of size '10
> To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
>
> On 23 February 2010 04:45, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>
> >> It seems that these thought experiments inevitably lead to considering
a
> >> digital simulation of
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On 26 February 2010 16:41, Rex Allen wrote:
>> Could our universe *actually* produce such a being by applying our
>> presumably deterministic laws to any set of initial conditions over
>> any amount of time?
>
> Of course it could. Peo
7 matches
Mail list logo
