On 5/06/2017 12:19 pm, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 4/06/2017 10:05 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Jun 2017, at 03:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Your claim appears to be that Bell's theorem is not valid in MWI.
Bell's theorem is valid. His inequality does not even assume QM, but
just locality.
I ag
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 11:48:23AM -0400, John Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Russell Standish
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > That is not the same thing. The largest prime number doesn't exist, so
> >
> > there's no answer to find there, but the halting problem always has an
> >
On 4/06/2017 10:05 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Jun 2017, at 03:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
In QM, with or without collapse, decoherence and the transition from
the pure state to a mixture gives a definite measurement result.
In particular branches only. When looking at the whole wave includin
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> I was juste arguing against John Clarks idea that the Bell's inequality
> violation introduce physical action at a distance, even with the MWI.
That's not exactly correct, what I actually said was *at least* one of
the following 3 t
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> Anything that can be done a Turing Machine can do, if it can't be done
>> then a Turing Machine can't do it, and neither can anything else.
>
>
>
> If "can be done" means "can compute or emulate", I am OK. That is
> basically Chur
On 04 Jun 2017, at 08:52, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Sure, we can take the same drug and talk about our experiences, and
conclude that they were similar. And they probably were. But
ultimately, there is a language grounding problem. We have no way of
comparing qualia, private experience. I cannot ev
On 04 Jun 2017, at 03:20, John Clark wrote:
Anything that can be done a Turing Machine can do, if it can't be
done then a Turing Machine can't do it, and neither can anything
else.
If "can be done" means "can compute or emulate", I am OK. That is
basically Church's Thesis.
If by "can
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:05 AM, Telmo Menezes
wrote:
>
> There is nothing that a quantum
>
> computer can do that a classical computer cannot do,
There are problems a
classical computer
can't solve in polynomial time that a quantum computer can.
>
> given sufficient
>
> tim
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Russell Standish
wrote:
>
>
> That is not the same thing. The largest prime number doesn't exist, so
>
> there's no answer to find there, but the halting problem always has an
>
> answer - a program either halts, or it does not.
>
But that's not the H
On 4 Jun 2017 1:05 p.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 02 Jun 2017, at 03:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 10:19 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 01 Jun 2017, at 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>> On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 31 May 2017, at 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 02 Jun 2017, at 04:06, Bruce Kellett wrote:
(answered in my previous post).
In quantum mechanics, this change is brought about by the unitary
processes of decoherence,
As Everett explains well, and suggest already this makes any
influence at a distance only apparent, but never real.
On 02 Jun 2017, at 03:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 10:19 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 30/05/2017 9:35 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 May 2017, at
On 4 June 2017 at 11:47, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 02 Jun 2017, at 00:29, David Nyman wrote:
>
> On 1 June 2017 at 18:00, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>> On 01 Jun 2017, at 16:42, David Nyman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1 Jun 2017 15:20, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01 Jun 2017, at 15:59, David
On 4 Jun 2017 7:53 a.m., "Telmo Menezes" wrote:
> Sure, we can take the same drug and talk about our experiences, and
>
> conclude that they were similar. And they probably were. But
> ultimately, there is a language grounding problem. We have no way of
> comparing qualia, private experience. I c
On 02 Jun 2017, at 00:29, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 June 2017 at 18:00, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 16:42, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 15:20, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 15:59, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 14:01, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 01 Jun 20
On 01 Jun 2017, at 19:38, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 12:44, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Creating a new thread to avoid causing decoherence on the other
one :)
What if the substitution level turns out to be at a higher level
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 1:20 AM, John Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
>> >
>> Regarding the quantum computer, I understand that it is still a
>> classical computer
>
>
> If a Human being like you, or any computer in existence today,
> had a telephone number and tried to m
17 matches
Mail list logo
