Not supported.
You choose a particular HA technology to use and stick with it.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 07 September 2010 18:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Not supported.
You choose a particular HA technology to use and stick with it.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Not supported.
You choose a particular HA technology to use and stick with it.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From
:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
You have to keep in mind that Fault Tolerance in VSphere is still
restricted to one processor and that's not going to change anytime real
soon. If you need high availability (which it sounds like) then that's
Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Not supported.
You choose a particular HA technology to use and stick with it.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday
: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: 07 September 2010 18:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
+1
Just went down this road with a large design I had to do with a
customer. What I did is have two MBX servers, that will be placed
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Hmm the devil really is in the detail isn't it. I've not yet dug into the
nitty gritty just the headlines/demos - so that's something else that's new.
OK let's start again :)
Assuming two separate location sites with good ethernet
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Are you talking about having a hot site in the second location for
failover? That's a job for Site Recovery Manager. Tuning Exchange
depends on number of mailboxes, Public folders, Full outlook (cached
mode) versus OWA
...@peak10.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
+1
Just went down this road with a large design I had to do with a customer. What
I did is have two MBX servers, that will be placed on separate vSphere4 servers
...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 07 September 2010 18:37
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Hmm the devil really is in the detail isn't it. I've not yet dug into the
nitty gritty just the headlines/demos - so that's something else that's new.
OK let's start again
Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
Not hot spare as in automatic failover or anything, that's overkill for us, but
the plan (not just Exchange but in general
...@peak10.com]
Sent: 07 September 2010 18:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
+1
Just went down this road with a large design I had to do with a
customer. What I did is have two MBX servers, that will be placed on
separate vSphere4 servers and all
[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on vSphere - Redundancy?
That's what I don't understand tbh - why the server/exchange should know or
care about any HA/vmotion stuff happening to the VM it's sitting
13 matches
Mail list logo
