> On 18 Nov 2021, at 16:53, Matt Corallo via Exim-users
> wrote:
>
> Same, I'd think, but according to the SpamAssassin folks its incorrect.
> According to them, a Received line like the following indicates that the host
> was *not* verified, but Exim seems to have fully verified the FcRDNS
On 19/11/2021 00:18, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> "Received: "
> "${if def:sender_rcvhost {from $sender_rcvhost\n\t}"
> "{${if def:sender_ident {from ${quote_local_part:$sender_ident} }}"
> "${if def:sender_helo_name {(helo=$sender_helo_name)\n\t"
One thing I
On 2021-11-18 at 17:16:14 UTC-0500 (Thu, 18 Nov 2021 22:16:14 +)
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On 18/11/2021 19:10, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
Also welcome, short of a patch, would be clues about how to detect in
an Exim-written Received header when a SMTP clie
On 18/11/2021 23:05, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
Checks of the peer IP against a hostlist item which is a name
will cause one, as will matching the host_lookup option or
an explicit verify=reverse_host_lookup ACL condition.
So, if none of that happens, what will the Received header look lik
On 18/11/2021 19:10, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
Also welcome, short of a patch, would be clues about how to detect in an
Exim-written Received header when a SMTP client IP has no rDNS or the rDNS name
doesn't resolve to the client IP.
It would be more reliable to interpret an Authenticat
On 2021-11-18 at 09:53:38 UTC-0500 (Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:53:38 -0500)
Matt Corallo via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
Same, I'd think, but according to the SpamAssassin folks its
incorrect.
I do not think that anyone involved with the SA project said anything
Exim did was "incorrect." If
On 11/17/21 11:56, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users (Mi 17 Nov 2021
13:17:33 CET):
Typo? What do you mean with "sender_rcvhost"?
Mea culpa. You're talking about the variable to be expanded inside the
Received header.
But given this, I still can'
On 18/11/2021 14:53, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
Received: from o13.mailer.shopify.com ([149.72.221.62])
by mail.as397444.net with esmtps TLS1.3 id 1mmjFb-0034Ki-02
(envelope-from
)
for vmstfp...@mattcorallo.com; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:10:54 +
Specifically, it seems Spam
Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users (Mi 17 Nov 2021
13:17:33 CET):
> Typo? What do you mean with "sender_rcvhost"?
Mea culpa. You're talking about the variable to be expanded inside the
Received header.
But given this, I still can't see any issue with the logs you provided.
--
Heiko
signature
Matt Corallo via Exim-users (Di 16 Nov 2021 17:47:22 CET):
> Like the title says, for some reason exim 4.94.2-7 (Debian stable) is
> refusing to ever expand sender_rcvhost to a verified hostname. The below
Typo? What do you mean with "sender_rcvhost"?
> shows a simple email inbound from github,
On 2021-11-16 at 17:03:14 UTC-0500 (Wed, 17 Nov 2021 01:03:14 +0300)
Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
is rumored to have said:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:11:50PM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users
wrote:
The way I was (apparently incorrectly?) interpreting a similar
expansion
here is that the
On 11/16/21 17:03, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:11:50PM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
The way I was (apparently incorrectly?) interpreting a similar expansion
here is that the host was not verified via FcRDNS due to the presence of the
square
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:11:50PM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
> The way I was (apparently incorrectly?) interpreting a similar expansion
> here is that the host was not verified via FcRDNS due to the presence of the
> square brackets in the parenthetical. Apparently that is the way S
On 11/16/21 13:47, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
Hello.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:47:22AM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
Like the title says, for some reason exim 4.94.2-7 (Debian stable) is
refusing to ever expand sender_rcvhost to a verified hostname.
Your mai
Hello.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:47:22AM -0500, Matt Corallo via Exim-users wrote:
> Like the title says, for some reason exim 4.94.2-7 (Debian stable) is
> refusing to ever expand sender_rcvhost to a verified hostname.
Your mail passed my relay with Exim 4.94.2-7 (frozen good old version)
a
Like the title says, for some reason exim 4.94.2-7 (Debian stable) is refusing to ever expand
sender_rcvhost to a verified hostname. The below shows a simple email inbound from github, as well
as the relevant DNS traffic from exim to the DNS server (with spamd stopped to ensure we're not
confusi
16 matches
Mail list logo