OK, when I got a usable 8.1 system with
kernel-2.4.8-26mdk running, I decided to try one more
time with kerne-2.4.17.8. This time, instead of doing
a source build I just installed the binary and
rebooted. It booted up and...jus as with my own build
attempts, pcmcia failed miserablely and sound w
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:17:12 -0800 (PST)
Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> OK, when I got a usable 8.1 system with
> kernel-2.4.8-26mdk running, I decided to try one more
> time with kerne-2.4.17.8. This time, instead of doing
> a source build I just i
I have wondered but then dismissed this. My new, fresh reinstall of 8.1 (6th
or 7th time in 3 days) properly recognizes and uses my 3c589 card...after I
dumped the default dhcpcd install and replaced it with
dhcp-common/dhcp-client rpms, that is. The big stopper now is STILL sound.
I had pe
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 09:25 PM, Praedor Tempus wrote:
> I have wondered but then dismissed this. My new, fresh reinstall of
> 8.1 (6th
> or 7th time in 3 days) properly recognizes and uses my 3c589
> card...after I
> dumped the default dhcpcd install and replaced it with
> dhcp-co
did you look here?
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/
it has kernel 2.4.13
Mike
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Again, did you ever build a 2.4.17 kernel from straight source (not from
SRPM)? And if you want 2.4.13 (or any other kernel for that matter),
it's available at ftp.kernel.org.
Cheers,
-Charlie
Praedor Tempus said:
> I have wondered but then dismissed this. My new, fresh reinstall of
> 8.1 (6
Praedor Tempus wrote:
> I have wondered but then dismissed this. My new, fresh reinstall of 8.1 (6th
> or 7th time in 3 days) properly recognizes and uses my 3c589 card...after I
> dumped the default dhcpcd install and replaced it with
> dhcp-common/dhcp-client rpms, that is. The big stopper
I have built 2.4.17 from source from kernel.org MOSTLY
with success...there are lots of errors on bootup, non
are fatal except for one that prevents me from getting
a network connection:
sit0: unknown hardware address 776
socket: protocol not available - make sure
CONFIG_PACKET and CONFIG_FILTER
The reason I have resisted straight kernel.org kernels
(up to now) is that the mandrake kernels integrate
more features than the simple kernels...like the grsec
settings in 2.4.17 that are not there in the
kernel.org kernel. There are other niceties too.
As for kernel-2.3.13, I had a working M
Praedor Tempus wrote:
> OK, when I got a usable 8.1 system with
> kernel-2.4.8-26mdk running, I decided to try one more
> time with kerne-2.4.17.8. This time, instead of doing
> a source build I just installed the binary and
> rebooted. It booted up and...jus as with my own build
> attempts, pc
Praedor Tempus wrote:
> The reason I have resisted straight kernel.org kernels
> (up to now) is that the mandrake kernels integrate
> more features than the simple kernels...like the grsec
> settings in 2.4.17 that are not there in the
> kernel.org kernel. There are other niceties too.
>
> As
nds said:
> Couldn't you save the configurationg of a happy Mandrake kernel that
> you customized and load that into the configuration of a source
> tarball kernel? Wouldn't that still provide a happy medium? You can
> also do a "diff" between the configuration file of a happy mandrake
> kerne
12 matches
Mail list logo