On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 01:01 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Martin Sourada a écrit :
> >
> > > So +1 from me
> > >
> > > There is still a minor observation: in the 256x256 version it looks like
> > > the small gear is not on the same plane with the other, like it is a bit
> > > backward, so
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 12:52 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Having the second gear smaller is a suggestion I wanted to make but I
> was shy about it: it was late in the discuss and I may sound much like a
> whiner which contribute only with words and no actual work to the icon
> set...
>
Don't be
Martin Sourada wrote:
I wasn't still happy about it so I decided to redo it from scratch. The
sprockets are now distributed evenly and the top gear is smaller. It's
still not there yet I think, but I leave the rest of the tweaking for
you.
Having the second gear smaller is a suggestion I wanted
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 11:29 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Added a second gear.
That works better.
> I forgot to shrink outline to 2px which has been addressed.
> Done for 16x16. Need to see how it looks on other screen.
>
Might need some more touches, the other sizes are looking crisp, but th
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 03:04 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> system-run is an action icon hence the use of table perspective
> following the guideline.
> It is derived from emblem-system, one gear is used instead of three like
> some other icon theme.
> 16x16 and 22x22 should be crisp enough. Comm
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 03:04 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> system-run is an action icon hence the use of table perspective
> following the guideline.
> It is derived from emblem-system, one gear is used instead of three like
> some other icon theme.
> 16x16 and 22x22 should be crisp enough. Comm
